526
Landlords (i.ibb.co)
submitted 4 days ago by LinkOpensChest_wav to c/libertyhub
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Ummdustry@sh.itjust.works 22 points 3 days ago
[-] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

This would be a quality post on r/ancap101 if I was not banned.

[-] Snowclone@lemmy.world 71 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

If no one is allowed to own a domicile in a residential zone intended for one or more people unless they personally reside there at some given point in a year, the prices of houses would be pretty agreeable, and then yes, people would be paying mortgages, which also means they'd own all the equity they are buying into while they live there. Landlords provide nothing but more exploitation of people already exploited to death.

[-] anothercatgirl 3 points 3 days ago

I'm a renter because i need short term housing less than a year and large apartment complexes seem to satisfy my needs alright ish. Would it be better if it was owned by investments from the people who live there long term? Dunno, sounds like a way to gatekeep poor people out who can't buy a share.

[-] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

There is a space in-between landlord-owned-apartment and individual-owned-condo called a co-op where the residents own the apartment building and pay a share of the operating costs and get a say in how the building is run.

There’s a variety of ways they can be run, but they are typically cheaper than normal renting in the long term, and can be competitive with renting in terms of the up-front cost.

[-] anothercatgirl 2 points 2 days ago

I do not believe co-op housing bylaws/elected leaders generally are supportive of rentals shorter than 13 months. They generally value long-term stability so they have policies that require longer leases. Of course there may be housing co-ops run by students or seasonal workers so they support short term leases, but that's a minority of housing co-ops. (This argument is very poorly researched).

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

This is a Lemmy comment section. Actual legislation could surely provide a good middle ground. Rental units offer valuable resource to a very specific minority of people, so they shouldn't necessarily disappear. But in my region, 42% of people rent a home. There is no reason for nearly half of the population to be living in a temporary residence. Everyone I know who rents has lived within the same 10 mile radius their entire adult lives.

[-] kittenzrulz123 61 points 4 days ago

Imagine a world where you didnt have to be a slave to capital for the right to live, truly horrifying (for capitalists)

[-] RedStrider@lemmy.world 29 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)
[-] jve@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago
[-] zea_64 32 points 4 days ago

You want to change the system? I don't get it, within the current system that wouldn't work. /s

[-] Shortstack@reddthat.com 28 points 4 days ago

Crabs in a bucket.

Nobody can have it better than they had it because it’s unfair that they didn’t

[-] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago

I get the joke, but I still feel compelled to point out that the alternative is affordable housing (both with rentals and ownership). If congress has the power to cap Baseball salaries, certainly they have the power to cap housing costs. Now we just need to figure out how to get them to do it.

[-] Walk_blesseD 26 points 4 days ago

Affordable? It's an improvement over the status quo, sure, but what'd be even better is decommodified housing.

[-] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

First step would be to get Wallstreet out of the landlord business.

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago

Make it illegal for anyone other than an individual human to own a house. Make it illegal to own more than three houses. Make it illegal to own houses in more than two states

Alternatively, We The People could start burning down real estate investment companies like our forefathers would have

[-] Dadifer@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

Social housing

[-] Trebuchet@lemm.ee 11 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

If idiots were a commodity, this would be our gold rush

[-] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 6 points 4 days ago

I feel like someone didn’t get the sarcasm.

[-] LinkOpensChest_wav 14 points 4 days ago

Or were they just playing off it 🤔

We'll never know

[-] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

What's with the whole anti-sarcasm thing? What's the alternative? People are just supposed to go around expressing sincere opinions like rubes??

[-] oftheair 7 points 4 days ago
this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2025
526 points (100.0% liked)

Liberty Hub

368 readers
10 users here now

  1. No Discrimination, this includes usage of slurs or other language intended to promote bigotry
  2. No defending oppressive systems or organizations
  3. No uncivil or rude comments to other users
  4. Discussion, not debate. This community is exclusively for genuine logical debate, any comments using whataboutism or similar will be removed.
  5. No genocide denial or support for genocidal entities. Anyone that supports the mass murder of civilians will be banned.

These guidelines are meant to allow open discussion and ensure leftists and post-leftists can have a voice. If you are here to learn, then welcome! Just remember that if you're not a part of the left (Liberals don't count) then you are a visitor, please do not speak over our members.

Matrix server: https://matrix.to/#/#libertyhub:matrix.org

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS