[-] oftheair 4 points 1 hour ago

Where are the safety shears?

[-] oftheair 3 points 11 hours ago

It is okay. We don't want to delete it, we'll reply instead with details once we have given it a listen, if possible. Thanks for sharing.

[-] oftheair 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

I don't think you're being very fair here.

Yeah, that's uh, fair. We guess a better way to put it is more than any other way of relating it is supposed to be that way, other relationship types are not inherently set up that way nor have that as an inherent guideline, is that okay?

[-] oftheair 3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Hi there, thanks for sharing. Did you see the community description? Is this song/collection sexual or non sexual? Can you describe the song or collection as well?

[-] oftheair 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

@dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone

We don't agree with that definition of Relationship Anarchy completely.

Hi, we're relationship anarchists and instead for us it's more about not basing our relationships on what society thinks they should be. We can have labels but they're not automatic and don't necessarily mean much, what matters more is what we agree upon those labels mean, ignoring what society etc defines them as.

We also don't agree with hierarchy at all in relationships, this means that friends are not less or more important than partners and vice versa, and one partner is not more important than another. Instead we tend to go for temporary priorities but nobody is overall more important than anybody else.

It can work for either those who are polyamorous or monogamous as well as long as the comitment of no hierarchy and not basing your relationships on predefined ideas of what they should be or look like.

On the polyamory side it tends not to fit with hierarchical polyamory (hopefully obviously), so it's more towards the solo polyamory or non hierarchical polyamory end.

We tend not to go for the relationship escalator, nor pushing each other into things etc, instead it is very consensual, unlike other relationship types, everything is discussed and consented to, and if it isn't it doesn't happen.

There's a manifesto written by Andie Nordgren who popularised it: https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/andie-nordgren-the-short-instructional-manifesto-for-relationship-anarchy

There's also this site: https://relationship-anarchy.com/ and the youtube channel AnRel (Anarcho Relating) that explains all this more in depth.

But yes, the labels thing isn't really much to do with it. Instead it's more about defining our own relationships as we want to, not how others want us to.

[-] oftheair 5 points 12 hours ago

We imagined Spy from TF2 saying this, good times.

[-] oftheair 2 points 13 hours ago

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Apollo_15_feather_and_hammer_drop.ogv

Without the m as the browser will decide for itself if it needs the mobile version.

[-] oftheair 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect

Without the m as the browser will decide for itself if it needs the mobile version.

[-] oftheair 4 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equivalence_principle

Without the m as the browser will decide for itself if it needs the mobile version.

[-] oftheair 2 points 23 hours ago
[-] oftheair 2 points 1 day ago
[-] oftheair 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

A meme template featuring Marie Kondo. In the top left Marie Kondo is saying "This one sparks joy" with a blank black square to the right of that for something to be input. On the bottom she is saying "This does not spark joy" with another blank black square for something to be input.

Image description: A meme template featuring Marie Kondo. In the top left Marie Kondo is saying "This one sparks joy" with a blank black square to the right of that for something to be input. On the bottom she is saying "This does not spark joy" with another blank black square for something to be input.

Edit: Here, we got you a higher quality version 🙂

164
Whoops! (featherlewd) (cdn.imgchest.com)
submitted 2 weeks ago by oftheair to c/femcelmemes

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.eco.br/post/16254910

artist's bluesky source

Image description: A queer comic like image. Two femme people are kissing in the first frame, one with purple and red hair, the other with blonde hair, the background is yellow. Then in the next panel the blonde haired person is kissing the red and purple haired person on the neck gently, the red and purple haired person reacts by saying "Mommy" in a moment of ecstasy. The last panel cuts to the red and purple haired person laying back on the bed, looking wide eyed and a bit confused or embarrassed at the blonde person and the blonde person looking at the red and purple haired person with a huge blush on her face, also looking embarrassed.

39
submitted 1 month ago by oftheair to c/womensstuff@piefed.blahaj.zone

In which Khadija Mbowe (they/them) goes into the anti-aging propaganda that's so prevalent in patriarchy, capitalism, and other such systems of control where it benefits those in power to create disharmony not only between each other, but also in ourselves.

A worthwhile and powerful watch.

Warning: talks about death, aging, capitalism etc.

16
submitted 1 month ago by oftheair to c/main

We keep trying, filling in the form and using the code from the link place and it just keeps telling us that there's an error no matter what we do. Could someone or somemany please look into it? Thanks!

5
Species euphoria stories (self.transspecies)
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by oftheair to c/transspecies

We were wondering, what gives you species euphoria? It can be either something that happened one time or it can be something that gives you euphoria time and time again.

We'll start: One time we did something nice for someone else and they gave one of us a shiny rock and their deadname.

It gave us so much species euphoria.

What about y'all?

13
submitted 2 months ago by oftheair to c/main

So using lemmy via the main web ui is very slow to load, and then sometimes only loads a few elements recently.

Can this be fixed?

12
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by oftheair to c/Plural

So a while ago we attempted to edit a fandom page but another editor kept reverting the change because some scientific magazine or something had claimed we don't exist.

Would any of y'all like to help us finding or by providing irrefutable (or at least scientific) evidence that we do exist so we can edit the page safely and if they complain provide links, books etc?

No worries if not, just we hate plural erasure and science that tries to 'prove' we don't exist when we clearly do.

7
submitted 2 months ago by oftheair to c/translater

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/28783084

How trying to define ourselves or others define us by assigned sex at birth doesn't serve us and is generally oppressive and incorrect, both scientifically and socially.

12
submitted 2 months ago by oftheair to c/ftm

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/28783084

How trying to define ourselves or others define us by assigned sex at birth doesn't serve us and is generally oppressive and incorrect, both scientifically and socially.

44
submitted 2 months ago by oftheair to c/mtf

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/28783084

How trying to define ourselves or others define us by assigned sex at birth doesn't serve us and is generally oppressive and incorrect, both scientifically and socially.

28
submitted 2 months ago by oftheair to c/trans

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/28783084

How trying to define ourselves or others define us by assigned sex at birth doesn't serve us and is generally oppressive and incorrect, both scientifically and socially.

19
submitted 2 months ago by oftheair to c/transgender

How trying to define ourselves or others define us by assigned sex at birth doesn't serve us and is generally oppressive and incorrect, both scientifically and socially.

120
Lynch Your Leaders (bobvylan.bandcamp.com)
submitted 2 months ago by oftheair to c/flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Great songs!

view more: next ›

oftheair

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF