They at least ostensibly opposed private ownership, whereas for liberals it is a fundamental value and viewed as something desirable. I think it's very dangerous to mix up these terms like this because it might prevent us from seeing the very real threats liberalism presents -- such as its role in enabling fascism.
I'm not defending either group, but liberalism necessitates the belief in tenets such as prioritizing the right of the individual above the needs of the community, private ownership, and the free market. Liberalism would tend to view a minimum wage increase as an adequate way to address inequity, whereas a communist would view the whole system as fundamentally inequitable. (I'm simplifying here, but you get the picture.)
She found him abandoned at an age when he probably should have still been attached to his mother. He is the sweetest thing and wants to do everything my mom does.
My mom's kitty eats popcorn
You're winner !
Haidy ho there neighbor!
Or were they just playing off it ๐ค
We'll never know
So police don't hear the distress calls of their people
Someone should've told the church about using Firefox + uBO + Sponsorblock
How often does one need to transport a sofa, table, or desk? That's what delivery trucks are for, which is a legitimate use of that type of transportation.
The drugstore cowboys driving Dodge Rams clogging up the streets aren't transporting anything more robust than a 12-pack of Mtn Dew and complaining about the price of gas
I've noticed this
Similar with the people who don't give a fuck about women's sports except for an excuse to marginalize trans people
This is still quite distinct from liberalism