674
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Tugboater203@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

It's nice to think about taking your ball and going home. However, if we denigrate Texas everytime they threaten to secede we really shouldn't be giving California a pass.

Edit- fix fat finger spelling

[-] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 4 days ago

I don't denigrate Texas every time they say they're gonna secede. In fact, I want them to. If they don't want to be a part of America, then let them go do their own thing. If that turns out to be a bad move for them, then that's on them.

[-] Winterfrost@lemm.ee 32 points 4 days ago

🐻New California Republic🐻

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 143 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Can we coordinate with Oregon and Washington to join Canada?

That aside, California leads the US in many ways, but we have a tendency to go too far and do really dumb things. We're pretty good at self congratulations even when other states stare, slack-jawed at our blunders. It's nice to have perspective.

[-] blakenong@lemmings.world 86 points 6 days ago
[-] Draegur@lemm.ee 38 points 6 days ago

i freaking love the idea of Cascadia becoming autonomous and independent. I'd love it if New England did that too.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] FundMECFSResearch 87 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Honestly at this point I feel the US would do great by splitting and becoming a confederation (think EU styles autonomy).

I think the differences are just too big to have a functioning state.

I also understand that the push towards these movements is often done by Russian propaganda, who want to do anything to split up the US and NATO.

[-] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 21 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I live in the EU, there are some good things but also ineffeciencies living in a confederation style government. To be fair, while consumer and labour protection in the EU has been amazing, we have to admit that there is almost no innovation in R&D going on in Europe as a whole compared to the US. Aside from strict regulations, this is because there is no single rule on how to promote R&D. Each countries have their own rules and promotions. Some states are innovators like Germany, or has no R&D at all like Ireland.

Another weakness that the EU has is on production and defense. As you rightly pointed out, Russia wants the West to fragment, and Russia wants the EU to remain chaotic when it comes to military production and have a disunited, if not an incoherent, European army. But external influence is not even the main issue, the main issue is that many EU countries are neutral like Ireland and Austria, who are not part of NATO. I don't know about Austria but it's very unpopular here in Ireland to join any military alliance and there is a negative image of NATO after the Iraq War. Finland and Sweden used to be anti-NATO until the Russian invasion of Ukraine. And with the legacy of the horrors of the Second World War, military production in Europe has been weak. Even though the EU has outstripped the US in terms of giving aid to Ukraine, much of these are non-military because European arms industries are struggling to produce. The US is still the primary military donor of Ukraine.

With different competing values and priorities, it's challenging for the EU to remain confederate. A lot of people advocate for the EU to federalise for this reason.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago

I know Cali won't HAVE to, but can they join Canada?

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 16 points 4 days ago

I know that a Canadian lawmaker offered to take Washington, Oregon and California as new provinces in response to Trump: https://www.kiro7.com/news/local/canadian-lawmaker-offers-take-washington-oregon-california-new-provinces/LPFT7I4AYBGCLHBKVOB2TIFQOQ/

[-] WhatSay@slrpnk.net 4 points 4 days ago

Other than the "state of Jefferson" I think all three states would be interested

[-] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 4 days ago

If California could actually pull it off, sure. They're the largest economy in the United States, and a larger economy than many whole nations. Would any sane country turn that down?

[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 55 points 5 days ago

Lots of peoole didn't read the article

According to the text of the measure, the state would be required to create a 20-member state commission to study California's viability as an independent country in 2027 and to publish a report the following year.
...
If the ballot question is approved, the proposal would declare a "vote of no confidence in the United States of America", but would not change the state's government or its relationship with the U.S. The measure would also call for the removal of the U.S. flag from all state buildings.

[-] KinglyWeevil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 5 days ago

Balkanization is beginning

[-] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 8 points 4 days ago

Well it's a start I guess.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works 117 points 6 days ago

please call it the "New California Republic"

[-] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 28 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

As long as it doesn't end up like Shady Sands.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Godric@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago
  1. Brexit was clever wordplay, every proposal since hasn't been. Fuckin "Calexit", do better.

  2. Yeah, you don't get to just leave a country. Believe it or not, there was actually at least one war about that!

  3. Fuck CBS for their cancer ass website.

[-] SpatchyIsOnline@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

Exit = vacate... Vacation...

Californication?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Spezi@feddit.org 14 points 4 days ago

Caleaveornia

[-] OlPatchy2Eyes@slrpnk.net 7 points 4 days ago

Californiout

[-] whyalone@lemm.ee 6 points 4 days ago

Californexit

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] meyotch@slrpnk.net 37 points 5 days ago

Sorry California, you will have to negotiate with Colorado and Arizona for your water. So basically you have to take us with you.

[-] Loss@sh.itjust.works 30 points 5 days ago

If they just kick out the alfalfa farmers and the almond farms, they don't need water imports.

[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago

They got desalination plants.

load more comments (20 replies)
[-] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 58 points 5 days ago

For all of the reasons given, secession from the United States is a bad idea. But I'm going to keep banging this drum: The metropolises need to secede from their states, while staying part of the United States. Heck, Los Angeles County alone has more people than 40 of the states. It's about time that they got fair representation.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

It's a moot point anyway, though, because the ruling post-Civil war (Texas v. White, specifically) determined that unilateral secession was not allowed. In order for California to leave they would either have to come to an agreement with the Federal government to do so (or a majority of all other state legislatures, or something... there's no precedent) or fight a war against the rest of the union and win, forcing capitulation and a concession.

Both possibilities seem extremely remote.

This is only posturing, and even if it passes it is not designed to result in California actually leaving the union.

[-] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 46 points 5 days ago

It would be cool if they actually called themselves the NCR

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

CA better get their hands on some ICBMs. Keep one pointed at DC, and another pointed at Mar-a-Lago. It's pretty much the only way a state can keep its sovereignty.

[-] alquicksilver@lemmy.world 48 points 5 days ago

Y'know, as unrealistic as this (probably? I'm not really sure of anything, anymore) is, seeing this pop up in my scrolling gave me a bit of relief. I've been so terrified and angry and anxious and unsure of the (immediate) future that it's practically paralyzed me. Knowing that this pipedream is there helped me breathe for a moment. I'll take what relief I can get right now.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 42 points 5 days ago

Okay, but then California becomes a smaller country bordering a much larger fascist neighbor with the largest military in the world.

In what world is that a good outcome?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] mrslt@lemmy.world 24 points 5 days ago

Yes, please. As a Californian who is already looking to move abroad, it would be a dream come true for my state to do it for me.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] leadore@lemmy.world 20 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Something that might work out better and would be a lot easier to do (thought still not very easy), would be to split into 3 (or 4?) states.

California has almost 12% of the US population concentrated in that one state! By far most of the states contain about 2% or less of the US population each.

By splitting, the population would be better represented in the Senate with 6 senators between them instead of only 2, and there might be a net gain in some other benefits that are given on the state level.

edit: I see that someone had already brought this idea up, but IMO it's a good idea that they should seriously consider!

[-] ModestMeme@lemm.ee 25 points 5 days ago

The right wing has wanted this for years because California is very conservative outside of its cities. Splitting the state up would guarantee a Republican Senate.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DesertHermit@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

The State of Jefferson would have started this process, but WWII got in the way. Except that was all predicated on being super racist.

I think if you get a legit Cal3 proposal, you might end up with a Cal4 where they pull from the six-state version where "Silicon Valley" is its own state shows up so that there can be some technopolis with custom laws and insane cost of living. Essentially, turning SFO into another Manhattan.

I would never move back to CA as it is, but if there was a breakup, I might actually go for it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz 10 points 5 days ago

Careful. Texas has some long forgotten provision where they could easily do the same thing, into 5 states. and they'd all be red.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Odd_so_Star_so_Odd@lemmy.world 20 points 5 days ago

Fight for better more fair representation, secession solves nothing.

[-] Cryan24@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago

It will take a massive chunk out of federal funding to reduce states most of whom don't pull equal weight

[-] Freefall@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

This is stupid and a pointless gesture. Do something more productive with your time.

[-] Majorllama@lemmy.world 23 points 5 days ago

God dammit I find this so fucking hilarious. Every time a Republican wins you'll inevitably see an article talking about California is to leave. And on the flip side every time we get a Democrat in office fuckin Texas starts bitching and tryna leave.

I'm not going to say it'll never happen, but I would be willing to bet all the 7 dollars I have to my name that it's not gonna happen.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2025
674 points (100.0% liked)

News

24232 readers
3523 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS