It probably is. Hamas wanted hostages, not bodies. I think most unarmed Israelis were killed by the Hannibal Directive.
If it's true, lol
Awww, is the wittle US nawt getting the wraw inputs it needs to sustain its industwy? š¶
Do you think the War on Terror is the first time that the US spawned countless atrocities against civilians?
Israel can't allow this, it would reveal how many of their own people they killed.
Good point. That said, she should have beaten him up. š¤·āāļø
Probably wouldn't stand up as well legally, though. Proportionality is also important when examining self-defense cases, she smacked him around just enough to get the police involved and get him arrested. That's a win.
I'm not going to leave it. You're wrong and you need to know it.
-
It wasn't just one instance on the bus. These AI nudes were being traded around for a while and it wasn't just happening to this one girl either. There were multiple victims that already been going to the school and the police for help. This was, essentially, a child pornography ring.
-
In the aftermath we see that the police also interpret the situation the way I do, which is why they arrested the boy while the girl who beat him up was not arrested. Not to say that the police should be totally trusted in legal matters, obviously, it's up to the court to determine the facts from here. I don't think the court is going to be sympathetic to this little creep.
-
In light of the fact that she and the other girls went to the authorities, what the fuck else were they supposed to do? Because it looks like beating this little creep up was actually the correct decision, because it got the legal ball rolling.
What is required is that there is a reasonable belief that they are in imminent physical danger. There are other factors, like attempting to deescalate and such, but she actually did that when she begged her school for help.
And being sexually harassed is reasonable reason to believe that they are in danger of sexual assault, or worse.
That's why, when the police got involved, the boy was arrested and now faces 10 charges. She has not been arrested and is not facing charges. Legally, she seems to be in the clear.
Yeah, and those extra steps require more land and more water and more transportation and more harvesting and more processing etc etc. Every extra step makes the whole system less efficient. We're essentially sacrificing farmland.
Near slaughter when they get fattened up on feed lots (called finishing) it's mostly cracked corn grain, it's more towards the beggining of life that they're fed roughage with only a small amount of supporting grain.
Okay, but can we stop using suitable farmland to grow corn cattle feed?
Was this self defense? She was just defending her digital privacy? Iām not a lawyer. As a layman, Iām going to say this does not meet the legal criteria. Morally? Absolutely.
Why do you say that?
She was being harmed and so she defended herself, and the harm stopped. Looks like self-defense to me.




The Bolsheviks are a good example. They started the revolution with the workers and peasants, because that's the only way to start a revolution, but when the government turns the military on its own people they could then recruit them to the revolution.