426
submitted 19 hours ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Summary

Progressives criticized House Democrats for choosing Rep. Gerry Connolly over Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for the top Democratic seat on the House Oversight Committee.

The 131-84 vote, reportedly influenced by former Speaker Nancy Pelosi, sparked backlash against the party’s “gerontocracy,” with critics like MSNBC’s Joy Reid and others arguing it prioritizes seniority over fresh ideas.

Connolly defended the decision, citing his experience, but progressives argued it reflects the Democratic Party’s resistance to change, hindering its ability to address future challenges and energize younger voters.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] demizerone@lemmy.world 15 points 4 hours ago

The ol battle axe was in hospital recovering from hip replacement surgery, but Pelosi still has the heart of a true leader, and managed to get a "young 74 year old" the seat. Way to go Democrats! You fucking idiots are why we have trump part deux.

[-] nandeEbisu@lemmy.world 12 points 6 hours ago

I'm not actually that surprised a vote by a bunch of politicians was decided based on politics and not which candidate was a better fit.

[-] Marleyinoc@lemmy.world 25 points 9 hours ago

Democrats don't deserve anymore support. We've got to get a party for the working class. It's just corporate whores in the GOP and DNC.

[-] WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

If you're interested in that you can always check out the DSA and see if they have a local chapter in your area. They're not a political party right now but imo if anything is gonna form a true labor third party in the US it will most likely come from there.

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 6 points 6 hours ago

The problem with a winner-take-all system like the Electoral College is that if you do not vote for the Democratic Party, you're just underpinning the Republican Party. The unfortunate truth is that every progressive who sat out the November election for various reasons helped put Trump back in the WH. The Electoral College has to go for a third party to be viable.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

That's true right up until it isn't. Just ask the Whigs.

[-] WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Sure on the national level that's true, but on the local level third parties can definitely make big gains in areas that are safe democrat seats traditionally. Then from there you fight to implement those kinds of systems at the local level and work up from there.

[-] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 8 points 9 hours ago

Maybe use those arms for more than just finger-wagging.

[-] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

slapping? maybe shooting?

[-] Marleyinoc@lemmy.world 19 points 11 hours ago

Yeah fuck the Democrats. I'm not giving the DNC or any mainstream PACs any more money. It'll all go through AOC and Bernie from here on out. (Not that my meager contributions mean much to the DNC Corporate whores.)

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 40 points 14 hours ago

The progress wing should leave the party. Force the dems to come crawling or show their hands as sleeper Republicans

[-] alloloto@lemmy.world 24 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

The frustration is real. There's a movement to create an American Labor Party. I think if it gets enough steam we might see some real change.

[-] reddit_sux@lemmy.world 1 points 48 minutes ago

I wish it would succeed but am afraid that this would lead to a bipartisan return to McCarthyism and Red Scare at the time when Russia is acting up again. America is allergic to the medicine known as Socialism for all of its illnesses.

[-] OminousOrange@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 hours ago

I hope it comes to fruition, but the duopoly is quite established.

[-] alloloto@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

Seriously. I think frustration with the Democratic party is at an all-time high though, and that might be an important catalyst.

Not holding my breath but I'll do that I can to help the cause.

[-] AlijahTheMediocre@lemmy.world 11 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

I'd be hopeful if it wasn't mathematically almost impossible for a third party. But as soon as it happens sign me up regardless.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

That's just for the president. There's no reason we can't have a third party in the House or Senate.

[-] CubbyTustard@reddthat.com 2 points 8 hours ago
[-] alloloto@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

Fixed, thanks! Forgot to add the https://

[-] CubbyTustard@reddthat.com 2 points 8 hours ago

thanks i'm checking them out

[-] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 25 points 13 hours ago

I'll believe they are "up in arms" as soon as they actually do anything.

[-] Allonzee@lemmy.world 93 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

The DNC is a right wing corpo puppet masquerading as opposition.

They're far more comfortable with a fascist as President than they would a leftist like AOC.

Stare at what their priorities are a month before Trump takes office, sabotaging their most leftwing members. Commuting the sentences of profiteer judges. Herp derp gotta keep moving right after all! (just an aside, I love the neoliberals defending Biden's corrupt pardons as "just senile/incompetent")

Reminder: the only leftist congresspeople are spoiler candidates. The DNC promotes solely on the basis of how well you prove you can be bought by large money donors, which tells you all you need to know about who's side they're on. The same side as the Fascists on economic policy, as they get the same checks from the same oligarchs.

I've voted blue for 20 years, with my nose held hoping for harm reduction. I phonebanked for Sanders in 2 campaigns. I already know it's all a sham. You can vote whoever you want as long as they're pro corpo capitalism. But in the 2028 primary, when I see the DNC yet again doing everything they can to kneecap a progressive to install a neoliberal, I'm walking away, as it's just another system of control. The illusion of choice.

If the people won't overcome their "free market" propaganda and vote against the shape and priorities of this sociopath owned economy literally legally conning and murdering us for tidy profits, we can't be saved, and there's nothing worth saving left.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 22 points 16 hours ago

The DNC is a right wing corpo puppet masquerading as opposition.

This kind of bullshit is so easy to believe, especially with stories like these.

For any of you under-30s just tuning in to the exciting world of corporate politics and wanting to just go along with that idea for funsies I encourage you to actually look at the jobs to be done. Democrats in office in DC are in the bare hundreds while nationally there are many thousands of actual good people doing the best they can to make this entirely fucked up clusterturd run for just one more goddamn day. Because traffic lights have to work. People have to clean the crap out of the sewers. Trees have to be planted by the city and maintained. Boring, entirely decent work being done by Democrats who have no interest in bombing Palestine and say so every chance they get.

Pitching edgy insults at them helps no one including yourself because the alternative to a national party that isn't owned by trump is absolute worthless chaos. Unless there's a secret unnamed party that we're not hearing about. Ten educated punks in a dispensary does not a political party make. It turns out to be much, much harder than that to do.

If you want to burn it down and don't have any idea what the fuck it does or is, you're doing trumps work for him. If you have a better idea why are you the only one with it?

Hey, if AOC and Bernie say - everybody go that way, then maybe we'll have a new party. Works for me. But until something happens at a national scale like that we've got one already that's open for change. It does involve speaking to others without a keyboard though, so that is a downside, but since it's always been that way I'm not sure we can blame it on corporations, capitalism, (((cabals))) or whatever.

[-] emeralddawn45@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 hours ago

What point are you trying to make here? You're basically saying "not all Democrats" while admitting that the party leadership is rotten to the core, and no amount of head down, hard working, stay in line, lower level Dems is going to change that. Like obviously nobody thinks every Democrat is a terrible person. But the ones in charge, who make the decisions and influence the party priorities and values, are entirely bought and sold.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 13 points 13 hours ago

This attitude right here, which is pervasive among the professional managerial class, is precisely WHY progressives failed to capture the Democratic party post 2016, where-as MAGA was able to successfully take over their corporate party, and bend it to their will.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 11 points 13 hours ago

Progressives fixing the traffic lights and sewers are exactly where Pelosi wants progressives, and no higher.

[-] Allonzee@lemmy.world 29 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

https://apnews.com/article/business-nancy-pelosi-congress-8685e82eb6d6e5b42413417f3d5d6775

I love how neoliberals are always more concerned with street lamps and trees for the dwindling middle class areas while never bringing up our greatest sin you have no interest in addressing, housing all homeless without condition. That should come before all else, from the worst off citizens upward. They're dying right now, needlessly. While others live in their compact cars and try to reframe it as a lifestyle because a studio is out of reach.

But they have no bribe checks, and serve capitalism as scarecrows. Dying of exposure, being legislated as not being allowed to exist at all even in supposed leftwing states.

Fuck the pretty commons, the less poors are rooting for the deaths of more poors for the crime of lowering property values while being killed themselves by the rich they trusted, and some still sadly do, to do the right thing by them. But that's your priority.

Honestly beautifying the commons in the areas protected from our most struggling, while our tent cities burst at the seams is beyond perverse.

[-] Drusas@fedia.io 1 points 2 hours ago

People where I live, Seattle, regularly vote to tax ourselves more to try to help the homeless. Somehow nothing seems to ever help very much. We vote for all sorts of different programs. Maybe it just hasn't been long enough to see which might be working.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago

You didn't mention the traffic lights or the sewers. I got the zeal for single-minded politics but in reality that doesn't work because, well, there are many many other things that have to be done. And not just traffic lights and sewers! Other things too. Uh, schools, hospitals, and . . probably industrial waste or disaster recovery. Good on you for the single thing tho - are you running for something?

[-] Allonzee@lemmy.world 8 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

I don't bullshit with a big fake smile, and that's all Americans are willing to buy, so no, I don't have what they want to buy to sell.

You're the one that started with trees and traffic lamps as paramount issues. I started with the capitalist rot, the blight that creates or informs all others. Clearly traffic lights and trees are your top ticket items. Good for you I guess. And we can barely do anything, so I always find it hilarious when you guys talk about us doing many things at once. We can't. We've proven we can't. The signature legislative achievement in most of our lifetimes was a healthcare bandaid that further enshrined the profit for murder capitalists into the system we begged them to remove and end as an industry. We the people aren't permitted to effect anything that would diminish private profits for the sake of the public, let alone several at once. Way, way, way too much credit being given.

If we can't reshape our economy to start rewarding prosocial vocations like teachers and nurses and start actively punishing runaway avarice, very little, and none of the most destructive issues, can begin to be addressed. There is profit to me made in human cruelty and murder, so long as it rolls downhill exclusively.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

I always find it hilarious when you guys talk about us doing many things at once. We can't. We've proven we can't.

I don't know how you mean - we got here somehow. By doing many things at once, was my take on it.

I don't bullshit with a big fake smile, and that's all Americans are willing to buy, so no, I don't have what they want to buy to sell.

Yeah me either, so I hear you on that one. Still - with all this old "new media" maybe someone will figure out how to run for office with it and we'll see some fast change for the better.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 40 points 17 hours ago
[-] kinsnik@lemmy.world 36 points 17 hours ago

why are the fucking boomers so resistant of letting go of power? pelosi is 84 years old, she belongs in a nursing house, not politics

[-] half_fiction@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 hours ago

A lot of these people are so old they aren't even boomers... Lol. The oldest boomers are still in their late 70s.

[-] sensiblepuffin@lemmy.world 16 points 16 hours ago

As with most people in that position, they've been fucking over people for so long that they're terrified of someone turning the tables on them. Hence gathering ungodly amounts of wealth and insulating themselves from the world.

[-] HuntressHimbo@lemm.ee 4 points 13 hours ago

They're like cats with claws stuck in something. They don't even understand that letting go is a thing they could do

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago

It's sad but true - and a very old story.

Just like, hey here's 100,000 no strings attached oh can you be at our vote on Thursday? - is a very old story.

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 44 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

it’s fine I’ve got experience

A fat lot of good your fucking “experience” has done us lately, wouldn’t you say, Connolly, you ossified, cancer-ridden, insider-trading, neoliberal establishment fuck.

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago

I take issue with using cancer-ridden as a derogatory term, but yeah, experience doesn't mean anything if you're working towards the wrong goals

[-] flicker@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 13 hours ago

Think if it as a moral cancer.

[-] AmazingAwesomator@lemmy.world 38 points 18 hours ago

rich old white guy: i have an idea - lets have a rich old white guy do it instead

[all vote yea]

:/

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 16 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)
[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 7 points 13 hours ago

DNC: "Look what you made me do"

[-] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 16 hours ago

There is NO TIME to do something about the Democratic party better than NOW.

Nothing much going on, no major elections, let's just get ourselves in shape for 2028. Or 2032 of it takes that long, but DAMNIT, let's get started!

They want a leadership power struggle? They want to play games, like everything's ok, "This is fine?" Let's not. Instead of expressing disgust, wringing our hands, shaking our heads, let's start something new. RIGHT NOW.

Because even a year from now would be too late.

[-] VintageTech@sh.itjust.works 8 points 14 hours ago

And they wonder why people start hitting people over the head with hammers.

[-] Zementid@feddit.nl 7 points 17 hours ago

Well... how about a third Party of Sanity?

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago

Sorry. No. I did the math on this and I've determined that a vote for Sanity is just a vote for Trump.

You need to end FPTP voting first. So please call the republican congressperson in your gerrymandered district currently authoring the "Ban Liberals From Voting Act of 2025" and let them know you'd like to make it easier for him to lose. If we all work together, we can make it possible for a Libertarian to win a House Seat in 2036.

[-] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 3 points 13 hours ago

American Libertarianism is an anti-establishment ideology that's been captured and twisted to support the core principle of the establishment, private property rights. At this point it's nothing more than a sick joke.

[-] gift_of_gab@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

we can make it possible for a Libertarian to win a House Seat in 2036.

They'd have to stop switching to Republicans first.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago

Sounds good. . . who's running it?

this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2024
426 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19223 readers
2420 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS