206
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ClockNimble@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago

The "Brain damage made me conservative" guy weighing in again.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

That's not Fetterman, Fetterman died.

[-] teamevil@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago

What a piece of shit, pardoning Trump would do nothing to slow him down from destroying every social advancement made since 1920.

[-] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 130 points 3 days ago

Fucking Class traitor. Coyote in sheep's clothing.

[-] Montagge@lemmy.zip 60 points 3 days ago

https://www.inquirer.com/politics/election/john-fetterman-black-jogger-2013-shotgun-20220425.html

In 2013, Fetterman pursued a man and pulled a shotgun on him because he wrongly believed the man, who turned out to be a Black jogger, had been involved in a shooting.

[-] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 35 points 3 days ago

This is who he's always been, but liberals were blinded by the D in front of his name and chose to ignore the shit he did before getting elected.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yes he sucks now, but your lazy take is revisionist history.

[-] caveman8000@lemmy.world 62 points 2 days ago
[-] Karjalan@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

See the "some more news" video on this guy. He was probably conservative all along but hid it well till recently

[-] buttfarts@lemy.lol 1 points 1 day ago

Not bad enough apparently. It would have been better for us if he wasn't active politically anymore.

[-] Old_Yharnam@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

This dude needs to be ‘primaried’ back to the stone age.

[-] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 57 points 2 days ago

He was never a democrat, people just love a scammer. He his that, passed a lot of money through his organization.

[-] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 38 points 2 days ago

At the height of the presidential election campaign, I got down voted for pointing out at Fetterman and Tulsi Gabbard as examples that there are Democrats who flip, because they rail on "vote blue no matter who". After Trump won his second term, I don't see those die-hard types anymore. They finally admit that the Democratic party is compromised through and through, and that only a progressive takeover of the party will solve the problems that arose.

[-] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 8 points 2 days ago

the Democratic party is compromised through and through

Always has been.

[-] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 2 days ago

The problem is people are trying to beat republicans by being just like them. Republicans stand or kill their own. That created Trump, dems want to do the samething. Normal people need to start running again and need support.

[-] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

The days of trying to court both sides and moderates have long gone past. It now requires more radical changes. If Democrats indeed want to win again, they have to go further left. The Republicans have rightly deduced that people want drastic change so they are unafraid to go further right (probably also because of influence from the Tea Party movement). Democrats need to go more populist like the Republicans have.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 days ago

If Democrats indeed want to win again, they have to go further left.

The basic problem is that the Democratic Party isn't at all inclined to go left. The people who run it and fund it want a centre-right party to be the only alternative to the far-right party. Left-wing politics doesn't funnel the money to where they want it to be. So the best they can do is tease people with a vague promise of progressivism, in order to win votes, but with no real intention or commitnent to deliver on it.

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Problem is, the nightmare scenario of a second Trump term has already arrived. I don't know if there will be further elections, I assume there will be and act as such. If there are then guess what? The nightmare is already here, and the disaster is already actively destroying the country, so tax credits for starting a small business or whatever the fuck aren't cutting it anymore. I want actual governmental reform.

They can either go left or they can fuck right off. Absolutely nobody will buy the "most important election of our lifetimes" bullshit again after whatever happens next year.

[-] samus12345@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago

There will continue to be elections. They just won't be free and fair, particularly in states with Republican control.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago

Well let's hope it wakes them up. I'm sure there are senior Democrats thinking, "Trump will make a mess and anger people, so we'll just ride this out until we can get reelected then back to business as usual." And "He won't abolish/undermine elections -that's just talk." Some of them will never learn, because they deeply don't want to.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

He was though, in his presentation at least. I still remember him giving this interview in front of a Wawa off the freeway when he was first gaining national prominence - message that felt so strongly progressive yet could be so really absorbed by the broader population.

Fetterman died from that stroke, this is John NOTOURman

[-] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

He seemed more like a maga person when he chased a black for going on a run.

[-] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 80 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

His noggin seems to be fully healed after his stroke: he's now a fully-functional politician once again, with perfectly working lying, backstabbing, flip-flopping and sycophantic brain functions.

Wish we all had access to this level of healthcare so we could all go back to performing our job to the fullest of our abilities like he does.

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 79 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

He just can't stop being fuckwit. He's just another Manchin and just needs to become a Republican and GTFO.

[-] kurwa@lemmy.world 47 points 3 days ago

I wouldn't be upset if he had another stroke at this point.

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 52 points 3 days ago

Its funny how brain injury tends to turn people right.

[-] inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago

No it doesn’t. I had a TBI and went further left.

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 4 points 2 days ago

maybe it has to be combined with excess money.

[-] inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago

Well I definitely don’t have that lol

[-] DrFistington@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago

Maybe it will fix whatever got broke the first time

[-] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

This, ladies and gentlemen, is what grievance politics leads to. Cenk*, Anna, Fetterman, Dore, etc, when you think of criticism as competition to get to the top, or you think of one person's success as a lack of your own, the only path is towards right wing grift.

[-] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Jenk, as in Cenk Uygur from The Young Turks turned to the right?

[-] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Sorry, Cenk, not Jenk. The point isn't that all of these people have become right wingers only that once grievance politics begins, that's where it ends if there is no reconciliation. Anna and Cenk both double down and treat other members of the left as competition rather than allies. This will drive them from the movement sooner or later.

When your calculus about why people are critiquing something you say is that they want to lower your status so that they can replace you, you've got a very different reaction, and one that will not involve actual engagement with the criticism. If you look at it from that point of view, their takes start to make more sense.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Fish@midwest.social 4 points 2 days ago
[-] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago
[-] YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH@infosec.pub 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

He named his media organization after a bunch of genocidaires for one.

[-] Fish@midwest.social 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I don't watch TYT, so I can't go into too many specifics. But from what I do know, Cenk and Ana have both been buying into the crime scare bullshit, and agree with Republicans on immigration. Ana has also been saying stuff that is anti-trans. Cenk and Ana are no longer at all leftists. Maybe funding dried up and they are trying to pander to a different audience?

[-] Sabre363@sh.itjust.works 25 points 3 days ago

At least now he seems to be being honest and telling us the kind of shitty person he really is

[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 23 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Still better than Oz would have been.

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago

Sure but that's like saying "at least it's not pancreatic cancer" when you have a brain tumor.

[-] bamboo 19 points 3 days ago

at least it’s not pancreatic cancer

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago

I almost wonder if things would have been better if Oz did get elected. Like when Massachusetts elected Scott Brown but then replaced him with Elizabeth Warren.

[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 days ago

That's a fair point!

[-] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

This matches up with him saying "good night" as his very first line in that debate.

That was an oopsie, but now he seems to have taken the conservative route of, identify with saying the opposite of reality instead of getting better at stating reality.

[-] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

I think this is a lesson for those of us who support economic populism: even though many, if not most Americans agree on many economic issues, we don't agree on everything. I don't know that we can say we have a majority consensus movement. I think there is a movement that has a plurality, and that's the Trump movement. As much as many of us might find that pretty disheartening, I think it is nonetheless true. Of the two main populist movements in the US, the progressive populist movement is simply not as large as the right-wing, Trump populist movement. I don't know if people like Fetterman are just more aligned with the Trump movement ideologically, or if they're moving to the larger populist movement for strategic reasons.

[-] Kitathalla@lemy.lol 6 points 3 days ago

Does anybody know the political leanings of his healthcare team after that stroke? Did they influence his fractured mind as it was healing? I wonder if 'stroke' is the new doublespeak word for reconditioning at a CIA black site.

spoiler/jokes for the too-serious minded.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2024
206 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19222 readers
2399 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS