210

Russian President Vladimir Putin on Tuesday signed a revised nuclear doctrine declaring that a conventional attack on Russia by any nation that is supported by a nuclear power will be considered a joint attack on his country.

Putin’s endorsement of the new nuclear deterrent policy comes on the 1,000th day after he sent troops into Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022.

It follows U.S. President Joe Biden’s decision to let Ukraine strike targets inside Russia with U.S.-supplied longer-range missiles.

The signing of the doctrine, which says that any massive aerial attack on Russia could trigger a nuclear response, reflects Putin’s readiness to threaten use of the country’s nuclear arsenal to force the West to back down as Moscow presses a slow-moving offensive in Ukraine.

all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Hubi@feddit.org 86 points 2 days ago

More empty threats.

declaring that a conventional attack on Russia by any nation that is supported by a nuclear power will be considered a joint attack on his country

Isn't that exactly what has been happening in Kursk? Kinda late to do anything about it.

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 46 points 2 days ago

Paper tiger has become a wet paper tiger...dude is just trying to hold on as long as possible. When he dies the power vacuum is going to be insane, unlike NK who has basically a king... I don't think anyone is in line for when putin bites it.

[-] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 day ago

i think this part already looked like this

[-] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 57 points 2 days ago

I wish the worst for this man

[-] hitwright@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

OOK OOK NOOK OOK!

[-] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 45 points 2 days ago

Couldn't he have just used them whenever he wanted anyway? Who in his country would stop him? I could see his generals advising against it but at the same time, they know they could be killed for the wrong opinions.

[-] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

in his country? no one. in general? that one nuclear bunker buster in Wyoming with his name written on it

[-] YarHarSuperstar@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Link? That sounds interesting.

[-] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 day ago
[-] prole 1 points 18 hours ago

But sir, he'll see the Big Board!

[-] Balex@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

There's no mention of bunker buster or Wisconsin on that page.

[-] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Sorry, i meant Wyoming. That's where american ICBMs are. Bunker is where Putin is likely to be in such scenario, and all probable locations are known to american strategic targeting

[-] Sabata11792@ani.social 7 points 1 day ago

Posturing. Nothing more. He's trowing the weekly Trumpian hissy fit.

[-] P1nkman@lemmy.world 46 points 2 days ago

Putin is just swinging his dick around, as he's always doing when showing "power". Fuck off, little man.

[-] BlitzoTheOisSilent@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

Oh shit or get off the pot, ffs.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago

I'm still not worried for the same reason I haven't been worried this whole time about it.

Putin has children and grandchildren. It's rare that a dictator does not want a legacy and I'm guessing he doesn't want his descendants ruling over Vault 13.

[-] r00ty@kbin.life 17 points 2 days ago

I don't read it that way. I think the previous "doctrine" stated that all nuclear weapons (including tactical) would only be used defensively against a nuclear attack, or if the country were in an imminent threat to existence.

This change means that if and when Ukraine step up their attacks inside Russian territory with conventional weapons made by western nuclear able nations, they are going to consider that attack to be made by a nuclear able nation.

I don't think that means they plan to start firing off strategic nukes against the west triggering a MAD scenario. That's not how I read it at all.

What he wants us to believe is that he's dusting off the tactical nuclear stockpile he has at his disposal, to be used against Ukraine with the justification that the attack counts as a strike from a nuclear able nation and as such their existence is threatened.

Now, here's the problem with this gambit. If Ukraine do step up their attacks and he doesn't do anything or worse they don't actually work, it's actually worse for him that he rattled this sabre and then didn't follow-up on the promise.

Anyway, that's how I'm reading it at any rate.

[-] Zorsith 12 points 1 day ago

In my eye, a lot of the value of Ukraine is the land itself for farming and (for russia) shipping capability; MAD is the only situation i would expect nukes to hit the ground, and I imagine another oligarch would knife Putin in the back before it gets to that. Then again, the US just elected trump, so oligarchs seem to be fairly spineless.

fuck it, kill us all with nuclear fire, at least it's faster than slowly boiling to death from climate change.

[-] CommissarVulpin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Stop worrying and learn to love the bomb.

[-] stringere@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago


Duck and cover!

[-] r00ty@kbin.life 4 points 1 day ago

While I agree on the whole, tactical nuclear weapons are usually in the 300t equivalent range. This is going to go scorched earth to a distance of around 250m, with the worst of the radiation damage limited to around 1 mile. Not underplaying it, but in terms of an entire country it's not that much. I tried on my relatively small town/large village. Not even half in the radiation zone (Nukemap).

That's likely going to be able to entirely take out an enemy position with a single strike, or a medium village/very small town while really not overall damaging the country as a whole.

But, I don't think he'll do it. It is I think the move he is trying to telegraph to the world, but it carries far too much risk to actually do it.

If he does, he's assured of action by western nations. Honestly, I'm not even sure Trump (well I at least hope not) would try to downplay it. It would be a huge escalation and everyone, especially Russia knows it.

[-] Zorsith 2 points 1 day ago

I'm less concerned about irradiation as I am about usable soil being evaporated, blown away, filled with debris, etc

I definitely agree. I don't think it'll happen, but I have very little faith in guardrails

[-] Know_not_Scotty_does@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago

Nah, this is Russia, they don't have vaults. They have metro stations and lines. It's different.

[-] tired_n_bored@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago

Eat my balls putin

[-] wildcardology@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago

If Putin does use a nuke on Ukraine, what's the appropriate response from Ukraine's allies? A full scale invasion to remove Putin from power? I mean if Putin used a nuke once then he can do it again right?

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago

It's hard to say what's appropriate. A lot of people feel like that's already the appropriate move, given their hugely successful election interference, assassinations abroad, continual war crimes, nuclear sabre rattling, allying with rogue nations, and the resulting destabilization of the global power dynamic. How do you deal with that if not regime change? Putin was so sure that regime change was an American aim that he made it a necessity. Paranoid Russian dictators and self-fulfilling prophecies, name a more iconic duo.

[-] bigschnitz@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

In that scenario I'm not sure if Ukraine allies are as significant as Russians allies. I very much doubt China has any tolerance for nuclear eacalation, that sets a precedent that will change how the West behaves in Taiwan. I imagine Xi's fury at being undermined this way would manifest in ways that meaningfully hurt Russia without any actual violence.

[-] Akagigahara@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

That is and was the entire point of the nuclear armsrace back then, sometimes called the MAD (mutually assured destruction) doctrine.

Basically, you stock up enough to guarantee you can destroy the world and now no one can use it, without being, well, MAD.

But Putin might be mad enough to ignore that

The Russians always had plans drawn up to conduct a limited, theater-wide strike or a tactical strike with nukes. MAD was based on the idea no one would do that and that strategic weapons were the only realistic way to use nukes which is scary as hell.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago

I think the world will still hold back from full war. I expect a significant increase in weapons support for Ukraine, but nobody wants to get their country nuked so they won't put boots on the ground, or attack Russia directly.

[-] Free_Opinions@feddit.uk 3 points 2 days ago

Probably a large scale conventional missile strike on Russian military targets Putin himself being the number one priority. He knows that the western intelligence agencies know his whereabouts at all times so unless he's going to live in a bunker for the rest of his life he knows that nuclear strike will literally be a suicide.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

You'll only make that mistake one time, big boy.

this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
210 points (100.0% liked)

News

23353 readers
2846 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS