351
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by ptz@dubvee.org to c/politics@lemmy.world

Cross-posted from "Too Bad, So Sad, Too Late - McDonald’s tells U.S. restaurants it’s not a ‘political brand’ after Trump visit" by @JimmyBigSausage@lemm.ee in !news@beehaw.org


Excerpt:

Though President Donald Trump visited a Pennsylvania McDonald’s location on Sunday, the fast-food giant is trying to stay neutral in the presidential race.

“As we’ve seen, our brand has been a fixture of conversation in this election cycle. While we’ve not sought this, it’s a testament to how much McDonald’s resonates with so many Americans. McDonald’s does not endorse candidates for elected office and that remains true in this race for the next President,” the company said in an internal message viewed by CNBC and confirmed by a source familiar with the matter.


I haven't eaten at a McDonalds since before covid, and I don't really miss it.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 134 points 1 month ago

If McDonald's isn't political, they should have that as part of the brand standards to which franchisees must adhere.

McDonalds' opposition to unions is political.

[-] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 81 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

“Upon learning of the former president’s request, we approached it through the lens of one of our core values: we open our doors to everyone,” the company said.

When you're door is open to fascist demagogues, it's not open to everyone.

[-] chetradley@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

If your company platforms racists, it's a racist company.

[-] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

If a Nazi sits at a table with 9 others and no one objects, there are 10 Nazis sitting at that table.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 month ago

we open our doors to everyone

So I can have my local McDonald's close for several hours while I get some vanity pictures of me standing in front of a fryer?

[-] Deello@lemm.ee 12 points 1 month ago

“... we open our doors to everyone,” the company said.

But also you must leave within 30 mins or it's loitering and you will be trespassed.

[-] Saleh@feddit.org 10 points 1 month ago

Allowing everyone behind the counter serving food to unknowing customers sounds like a massive health code violation.

[-] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Without a hair net or hand washing in Trumps case. Photo op is gonna get y'all sick and you'll deserve.

[-] djsoren19@yiffit.net 7 points 1 month ago

They don't care. Nazis have money too, and McDonalds doesn't discriminate.

[-] ianhclark510 69 points 1 month ago

You claim to not be a political company, but you gave a platform to a facist rapist ~3 weeks before his election

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 10 points 1 month ago

It was a franchise that did it, and a shitty one at that.

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 month ago

They haven’t revoked the franchise license which means they support the action.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] dhork@lemmy.world 52 points 1 month ago

Too late! MAGADonalds is now as toxic as Chik-Fil-A (both politically and to your colon)

[-] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 month ago

I still hate the chicken place more. On top of the other overtly political shit, I really dislike how they get their shitty restaurants into airports and thruways and other places with captive audiences and then still close on Sunday just for their virtue signalling bullshit. If they were actual Christians they would pay their employees more and open on Sundays to give food to the hungry. Hell even Ronald gives some money to orphans.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

thruways

Exactly what they did in New York State. What use is a highway rest stop where the main food store is closed on Sunday?

But the company that New York gave the contract to is the problem. They made those rest stops too small. All it takes is one bus stopping and the line for the tiny restrooms will take a half an hour. I hope the company goes bankrupt and they tear them all down again and rebuild them to be the proper size.

[-] elliot_crane@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

You know I’ve been thinking about this since the memes are really driving home this association between the Hamberdler and McD’s. I wonder if this will push people away from buying their food on the long term and inadvertently lead to some subset of the population eating healthier than they otherwise would have. Probably just wishful thinking on my part though.

[-] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago

Yeah although probably bk will just double down on the impossible menu, igniting the first of the burger wars.

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 50 points 1 month ago

They can distance themselves all they want. The damage is done.

[-] auzy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

They're all franchises

I can't imagine there is anything in the contract they violated either.

But, that being said, I would certainly avoid that Macca's and the franchise owners ones

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I can't imagine there is anything in the contract they violated either.

That's part of the damage done. They can claim they're non-political, but they allow their franchisees to make corporate appear political, because they're basically the same thing to the average person because they don't know the difference.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TehWorld@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago

It seems that most McDonald’s are removing EVERYTHING from their lobbies. No more free refills on drinks, no ketchup or salt, even napkins are behind the counter now. Makes for a considerably more annoying visit, especially as they’re woefully understaffed, so you have to wait for someone to be bothered to get a couple napkins and ketchup while your kid screams at you.

[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 30 points 1 month ago

The point is to not have a lobby anymore.

The US has always been obsessed with the drive-thru (nothing says good eats quite like huffing car fumes) and covid pushed a shift toward people just buying fast food to take home and eat.

So discourage people from dining in until "The demand is low so we are being more green or some shit by getting rid of it".

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 3 points 1 month ago

The original McDonald's didn't have a lobby. You were supposed to eat the food in your car.

It looks like McDonald's is trying to get back to its roots.

[-] TehWorld@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Makes sense, except that they won’t get any of this business if they take away the play-place. I’m already leaning away from McDonald’s due to this.

[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I mean this in the most polite way imaginable but: You don't matter. You are an individual whose stated stance is far from the majority of their consumer base.

Also: I very much won't go to a place that I know is drive-thru only. But the number of times where I needed a quick bite to eat after a flight and the lobby of the taco bell or whatever was locked and I just went through the drive thru instead? People will adapt pretty quick.

Which... is the entire point. If people know that getting a napkin or a ketchup packet involves talking to the one person at the counter then they will stop dining in at all. Which will make removing the dine-in even less disruptive.

[-] tiefling 16 points 1 month ago

They've also been supporting the IDF for a while now. Fuck McDonalds.

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 6 points 1 month ago

i believe this is simplification for automation. dont need humans if you dont need resources in the lobby.

[-] stoned_ape@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Some fast food places near me have started using automated ordering at the window ie a chatbot

Also order-yourself screens in the inside ordering zones

Which I guess is cool or whatever but some of us don't mind human interaction and are fine paying .50 extra for a taco if that keeps someone employed until we can figure out how to move to a more automated world without fucking over those at the bottom

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 3 points 1 month ago

It is more that the cost of operating a dining area isn't worth it for a lot of fast food restaurants.

You have to dedicate staff time to maintaining the dining area. You also have have to maintain a public restroom, even if it is only for customers. At best, you only get the random biohazard of someone shitting themselves. It then slides to being the bathroom and living room to an unhoused population or a place where junkies go to do heroin.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 37 points 1 month ago

You can't just say it. Where's the action?

Revoke that fucker's franchisee licenses to start. He'll paint the building red white and blue, rename it Magadonalds, and they'll all flock to it and get dysentery from the freedom meals until it closes down when it's revealed that he's been molesting kids at the Sunday school he "volunteered" at

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com 35 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Oh look, a sack of shit serving shit food.

Fuck McDonald's.

[-] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 month ago

A sack of shit serving sacks of shit

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago

McDonald's trials a second clown in bizarre PR stunt, attempts to distance themselves immediately after.

McDonald's today attempts to disavow a PR stunt after backlash regarding a second clown character being added to the fandom. Reviewers described the addition as "depressingly old," "demented," and "a massive health code violation."

Other reviewers were appalled at the character's backstory. "This is supposed to be a family restaurant," said one online complaint, "they're adding a character who is rapist wearing orange clown makeup? I know we're close to Halloween but that is just completely unacceptable. I cannot bring my children here."

[-] Fluffy_Ruffs@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago

I haven't eaten at McDogball's in years. Their food has always been trash and now it's overpriced trash. If this steers more people away from eating there for political reasons then all the better.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] 2piradians@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

Ah yes, damage control. You chose this, Mickey D's, now would a sales slump 'resonate' with your shareholder clowns?

[-] JWBananas@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

That's not how franchising works

[-] 2piradians@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Does corporate not make money from franchises? Honest question because I thought it worked that way.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 month ago

They should try telling their franchisees that...

[-] MooseTheDog@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Finally a clown with more makeup than Ronald McDonald.

[-] BigPotato@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Pretty much the same, can't really boycott something I've already been not consuming!

[-] StrongHorseWeakNeigh@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Their sausage mcgriddles are a guilty pleasure of mine from time to time.

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 5 points 1 month ago

They're as delicious as they are bad for you lol, but yeah, I get that.

I can make a passable facsimile of them at home as an occasional treat.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago

First they came for the Trans People. Then they came for the immigrants. Then they came for McDonald's. We warned you.

[-] aquinteros@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

yeah I'm going to start non politically going to Carl's jr from now on

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Looks like ya just got blockaded, MickeyD's

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

CNBC - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for CNBC:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.cnbc.com/2024/10/21/mcdonalds-says-its-not-political-after-trump-visit.html
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

[-] rauls4@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

They made their choice.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
351 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19118 readers
2456 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS