374
submitted 2 weeks ago by TheOne to c/world@lemmy.world
all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 66 points 2 weeks ago

I'm guessing Musk could easily have Starlink cut them off if he wanted to. It's not exactly hard for them to geographically locate one of their base stations.

[-] oce@jlai.lu 31 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

See the explanation in the source article https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2024/10/12/starlink-russia-ukraine-elon-musk/

It is pretty much what was answered to you, when it's on the frontline it is very hard to know if it's Ukrainian or Russian usage, even in Russia now that the Ukrainians did an incursion. Ukrainian themselves are worried to be cutoff by geo fencing.
About the billing account, there is a well organized black market that will use European identities and bank accounts before selling the service to Russians.

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 14 points 2 weeks ago

there is a well organized black market that will use European identities and bank accounts before selling the service to Russians.

I don't think people would particularly mind if their Portuguese account didn't work, specifically, on the Ukrainian front line. Unless they're Russian soldiers in which case boo-hoo. The only accounts who should work anywhere close to the Ukrainian-Russian border should be Ukrainian army ones.

[-] prole 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Also, like... who fucking cares? Take them down anyway. Let them lose their internet, and then find out exactly why. They should be informed about the services they're paying for.

I feel like they’ve got to have something like MAC address filtering that they could easily employ in combination with geofencing. Specifically, have the Ukrainians give the MACs of transceivers they’re using in/near contested areas, and only let those have connectivity. To not have that would be kinda insane.

Also, Musk just doesn’t want to, because he thinks it’s better if the Russians win.

Really a bit shocked the DoD isn’t stepping in over this matter and how he’s handling it.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

It's paywalled. And I'm pretty sure they could work with the Ukrainian military so they can say "turn it off over in this place."

[-] oce@jlai.lu 5 points 2 weeks ago

While Russian companies and individuals are not authorized to sell Starlink, a gray market has emerged, fueled by the high demand from military forces and private buyers.

The Post reviewed four of the many Russian sites offering direct sales for the “special military operation,” the Kremlin’s euphemism for the war. Most terminals are sold through Telegram and start their journey in the Moscow area, before being funneled to the front.

One site offers a terminal and connection fees starting at just above $1,000. Customer service is free, and each client receives recommendations “to minimize risks of blocking,” the page notes, with glowing video testimonials from soldiers.

“We have been using Starlink for about a month. No complaints, the speed is good,” one review said, showing a terminal covered in camouflage. “Technical support works great.”

“The internet is flying, the men are happy,” another said. “Gentlemen, I recommend!”

To activate a device, users need a foreign phone number, email address and bank account to pay the monthly subscription fee, prompting suppliers to seek out people willing to lend their identities. Users in “client support” Telegram chats say it is easy to buy and register Starlink kits abroad. Most are obtained in Europe and transported through the United Arab Emirates. One page warns not to activate the terminal in Russia.

One supplier advised that connections for devices bought in the European Union could be blocked after 90 days of usage, suggesting one solution is to register using Ukrainian details.

Hard to shut down

Starlink can both disable individual terminals based on their ID numbers and block areas from receiving a signal, a practice called “geofencing,” the Federal Communications Commission told a U.N. regulator this year.

One person familiar with Starlink said that the company is technically capable of identifying the location of active terminals based on their pings up to satellites, but that it can be challenging to discern the user in the “forward edge of the battle area,” where Ukrainian and Russian troops are operating.

Stacie Pettyjohn, defense program director for the Center for a New American Security, said the U.S. effort to curb Russia’s use “doesn’t seem like it’s been hugely effective,” partly because of the shifting front lines.

“Ukrainian forces are in Russia now. Where exactly are the front lines?” she said. “If there’s a line drawn as to where it works and where it doesn’t, you’re basically fixing the front lines where they are and preventing the Ukrainians from going on the offensive.”

Ukrainian troops, for their part, said they also had concerns over denying access in geographic regions because it may shut their own terminals down. As it is, the troops entering Russia as part of August’s incursion suddenly found their terminals not working because of the geographic restrictions.

Significantly, they soon found workarounds to get the Starlinks online again — probably the same methods Russians have deployed. Interrupting the software update process and tweaking GPS settings can get it working in Russia, said a Ukrainian drone pilot operating there.

There are other viable methods to control illegal terminals, said Todd Harrison, a senior fellow and space security expert at the American Enterprise Institute. One possibility, he said, is for Kyiv and Washington to collect terminal IDs and provide them to SpaceX, with direction to deny access to anything else.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

There are other viable methods to control illegal terminals, said Todd Harrison, a senior fellow and space security expert at the American Enterprise Institute. One possibility, he said, is for Kyiv and Washington to collect terminal IDs and provide them to SpaceX, with direction to deny access to anything else.

Cool, how about that happens?

Elon says no? Oh well.

[-] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

How is it hard to send an RSA key to the Ukrainians and geofence every starlink in the region that doesn't provide it.

[-] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago

It is pretty much what was answered to you, when it’s on the frontline it is very hard to know if it’s Ukrainian or Russian usage

You could collect Serial Numbers from any node that moves from inside of russian space to outside of russian space and hard block them.

This would even keep units that move from Ukraine to Russia working in the case of Ukrainian military using it.

[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 weeks ago

The problem is that both sides are using it and both sides are in the same general area. So cutting off a device on Russian soil could very well be a special forces group planning sabotage.

There are definitely solutions but they all involve giving a Russian agent direct knowledge of troop movements.

[-] commandar@lemmy.world 39 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

There are definitely solutions but they all involve giving a Russian agent direct knowledge of troop movements.

Starlink terminals are activated using a unique identifier. It's how billing works.

SpaceX knows which terminals have been provided to Ukraine. We know they can geofence service. Geofencing the Ukrainian theater to terminals that were provided to Ukraine shouldn't be a massive technical leap and doesn't provide any information they don't already have.

[-] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago

SpaceX knows which terminals have been provided to Ukraine.

They know which ones they've provided to Ukraine. Hardware like that has been and is still being donated through third parties daily.

Now, they could have Ukraine tell them which terminals are in use, including anything they've gotten from elsewhere, including stolen back from Russia, and use that to manage, but that would require the CEO of the company to actually want to help honestly.

[-] commandar@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Hardware like that has been and is still being donated through third parties daily.

It's more in Ukraine's interest to limit the use of Starlink to only those terminals that have been vetted through official channels than to allow blanket use and try to filter out things through other means due to... the exact kinds of situations this article is talking about.

but that would require the CEO of the company to actually want to help honestly.

Sure. And part of the reason we know Starlink is entirely capable of geofencing is because Elon's done it explicitly to stop Ukraine from being able to operate near Crimea. That whole kerfuffle lead to military usage being pushed over to Starshield and a contract with the US government that gives them explicit say on when and where Starlink works in Ukraine.

Elon is dumber than a bag of hammers but it'd be next level stupid even for him to willingly break a DOD contract, especially when people were already floating the idea of invoking the Defense Production Act last time around.

Precisely. It’s not rocket science. And SpaceX is literally doing rocket science. This is a fully solvable problem. Eel on musk just doesn’t want to solve it.

[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 weeks ago

For very obvious reasons, Ukraine may not want musk to have every single units position. Let alone groups that supplemented their own resources with Amazon.

Could starlink figure this out? Yes. But it would make everyone involved uncomfortable to know the theoretical has become documented and easily searchable.

[-] piecat@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

I bet money Russia starts getting absurdly good. And they'll have really good info. And it will be because of starlink.

[-] tophneal@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Location info shouldn't be needed, though. (Even though they should technically be able retrieve location data from any terminal on their own already. It's all their hardware and network.) They should be able to geoblock traffic from Ukraine/Russia while having a kind of Allow filter for the terminals they know they provided for use by Ukraine.

It's the same concept as blocking a country's domains but allowing certain domains of that country through for emails. They just need to setup a "spam" filter.

[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago

Again, that assumes that Ukraine want a company run by a Russian asset to know every single device.

But also? There is a lot of value in civilians being able to reach the outside world as well. Especially under an occupation.

[-] prole 3 points 2 weeks ago

You know what's weird? There's an Xfinity wi-fi access point near me, but unless I have the right credentials, I can't log in.

Yet I'm in the same area as others who can log in. What gives????

Almost like, I dunno, there are other ways to block people besides being completely location-based. Especially when we are talking about military-use.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

I would think you could wait until Russia took over a town and then cut off Starlink to that town until Ukraine makes advances.

[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 weeks ago

Same problem

"Hey musk? Could you restore service to this town at 2 am on Wednesday? No reason but also please don't tell putin or trump."

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Cool, except that's what I'm saying. I'm saying the Ukraine military tells Starlink where the Russians are and they block them. Then if they move, the Ukraine military tells them that. I'm guessing Putin already knows where his own troops are and I'm guessing Starlink has a phone number, as does the Ukrainian military.

[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago

Why would Russia move? I'll give you a hint: it involves shooting at them.

So unless Ukraine wants to not be able to communicate with recon units before every attack...

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

So unless Ukraine wants to not be able to communicate with recon units before every attack…

You mean like with a phone? You're right, not possible.

[-] nifty@lemmy.world 40 points 2 weeks ago

Explains why Musk is supporting Trump so hard, a Harris admin will ask hard questions about stuff like lol

[-] prole 22 points 2 weeks ago

I 1000% believe that Musk sees Trump as his only way out of all of this... Especially with Twitter losing so much money.

If you look at Nazi history, fascism and big business have a very close relationship. He wants to be the Henry Ford of the New American Nazi Party (AKA the GOP).

He wishes he was Henry Ford. But also... fuck Henry Ford.

[-] skyspydude1@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

When you look at the regulatory environment and enforcement under the Trump admin, even before they were best buds, it's very clear that Elon is absolutely terrified of a Harris administration. The moment Biden took office, he was almost instantly under investigation from basically every letter agency in the USA, and they've been slowly chipping away at his Jenga tower of fraud. He sees Trump as the only way to hold on to his ill-gotten gains and avoid a prison cell.

[-] fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee 3 points 2 weeks ago

Not shocking a sociopath would choose a sociopath as a role model.

[-] this_1_is_mine@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

You forgot the Catholic church. But that was for different reasons...

[-] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

a Harris admin will ask hard questions about stuff like lol

Harris is in power right now... Literally as we speak and has several more months. This has been going on for months already. What makes you think she's going to do anything when she hasn't thus-far? I've seen at least a half-dozen articles on similar outcomes of "Elon's technology is aiding Russia". For well over a year now. If she hasn't done jack shit about it for the past 12 fucking months... and will not for the next 3 she's still in power... What in the ever living fuck makes you think she's going to do anything about it at all?

Edit: I recognize that Trump won't do shit about it either. I'm not backing Trump here. Just finding it laughable that people think Kamala will either when she's done nothing against it before.

[-] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Either you have no idea how the government works or you're lying.

Vice presidents have absolutely no power to affect anything at all in the US government. The only power they do have is to break a tie in the Senate which never happens.

[-] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

You are wholly wrong.

https://www.usconstitution.net/vice-presidents-constitutional-powers/

For one, constitutionally they have several additional powers that you neglected to outline, not just the one you provided. This also assumes that we're talking about a president and vice-president who are hostile to each other and not actively working together, you know... how it originally was when #1 vote became president and #2 became vice-president, which hasn't been a thing in over 200 years now.

For two... https://youtube.com/watch?v=81gnQ4Xo9Wc&t=12m50s

Biden says: "She helped passed all the laws being employed now. She's a major player in everything we've done. Including passes of legislation which we were told we could never pass"

If she's so "powerless" then why is the President stating that she's been instrumental to passing all that legislation? You act like Biden wouldn't/doesn't listen to her. And if that is indeed what you're asserting, then there's no point in discussing anything further with you since the man himself said otherwise. Which does indeed include everything that he's assigned to the vice-president over the years. I'm a bit too lazy to pull up all the cases where he's said that himself... I'm sure we can agree that it's happened a few times though.

The fact that you want to make some assumption that she has no power simply because the constitution doesn't directly give her all that much in the form of power ignores the fact that Biden clearly relies on her quite heavily by his own admission. She has power. You're bullshitting me and everyone who reads your post.

Edit: Oh! and also... you stated that tie breaks never happen. That's funny because Kamala even exercised that power 33 times.

https://ballotpedia.org/Tie-breaking_votes_cast_by_Kamala_Harris_in_the_U.S._Senate

for something that "never happens" seems to have happened a lot. Nearly once a month for her whole term. So yes, you are wholly wrong on everything you stated outside of the tie break being one of her current powers.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 36 points 2 weeks ago

Nothing to see here, just Musk enabling fascism and genocide, as per usual

[-] Siegfried@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago
[-] LANIK2000@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Jesus christ, it's a second time in the past 5 minutes that I see another post about some "news" that's just "remember the bad guy? Yea, he's still at it, just did the same thing as last time again, mmhm, it's the news where new things happen.". Not saying it's bad to reported this, but I'm getting really fucking sick of shit not changing. We knew that Elon loved playing war games basically since the beginning, doing shit like disabling starlink in the middle of missions. There's no rule of law in the US, MAGA is proof of that.

[-] prole 5 points 2 weeks ago

You seriously don't think this is newsworthy? What a strange reaction.

[-] ChronosTriggerWarning@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Not saying it’s bad to reported [sic] this, but I’m getting really fucking sick of shit not changing.

No, they're saying they're sick of all the obvious corruption and obvious bullshit going unpunished.

Kyiv and Washington face difficulties solving the problem of Russian use of Starlink, analysts have said, especially ... the technical challenge of denying access to the Starlink network without affecting Ukrainian troops.
SpaceX ... said it deactivates terminals if used “by a sanctioned or unauthorized party.”

Not that I like Musk, but, this really seems like a tough case of whack-a-mole rather than Starlink deliberately helping Russia or looking the other way. Also,

Interrupting the software update process and tweaking GPS settings can get it working in Russia, said a Ukrainian drone pilot operating there.

So even using a whitelist of IDs may not be enough if the Russians are good enough to register a terminal in the EU and then forge the GPS to make it look like the terminal is still somewhere in the EU.

Basically it seems like Starlink is trying to cooperate but it's just not a simple fix.

To activate a device, users need a foreign phone number, email and bank account to pay the monthly subscription fee, prompting suppliers to seek out people willing to lend their identities. Users in “client support” Telegram chats say it is easy to buy and register Starlink kits abroad. Most are obtained in Europe and transported through the United Arab Emirates. One page warns not to activate the terminal in Russia.

Wow, they are really going quite a long way to avoid detection!

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Ukrayinska Pravda (The Ukrainian Truth) - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Ukrayinska Pravda (The Ukrainian Truth):

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - Ukraine
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2024/10/13/7479504/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2024
374 points (100.0% liked)

World News

38936 readers
1696 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS