[-] underisk@lemmy.ml 132 points 11 months ago

"()()" is an ambigram, which wikipedia describes as "visual palindromes", for whatever that's worth.

[-] underisk@lemmy.ml 79 points 1 year ago

please only make your voices 'heard' in the designated free speech zones.

[-] underisk@lemmy.ml 84 points 1 year ago

nah, they're gonna make fun of Trump for being broke with childish nicknames instead. sink down to his level while making him sound more relatable to all the broke people they want to vote for them. sometimes i think they're trying to lose.

[-] underisk@lemmy.ml 92 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Targeting the hospitals was a deliberate tactic to make this kind of information harder to reliably gather and disseminate.

[-] underisk@lemmy.ml 138 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Previous record holder. source

[-] underisk@lemmy.ml 89 points 1 year ago

the comic is about using a machine learning algorithm instead of a hand-coded algorithm. not about using chatGPT to write a trivial program that no doubt exists a thousand times in the data it was trained on.

[-] underisk@lemmy.ml 117 points 2 years ago

Not just space, bandwidth.

[-] underisk@lemmy.ml 79 points 2 years ago

There’s a default invisible prompt that precedes every conversation that sets parameters like tone, style, and taboos. The AI was instructed to behave like this, at least somewhat.

[-] underisk@lemmy.ml 94 points 2 years ago

It’s just a robots.txt flag that explicitly mentions a google user agent string. This is about as effective at stopping AI from training on your data as a “no trespassing” sign hidden behind the hedges of your unfenced lawn is at stopping trespassers.

[-] underisk@lemmy.ml 141 points 2 years ago

I’d like to see more substantial consequences for consciously and deliberately sabotaging a war operation using a service the pentagon paid him to provide.

[-] underisk@lemmy.ml 101 points 2 years ago

We already had a nationalized SpaceX. We defunded it and gave grants to private companies like uh… SpaceX.

[-] underisk@lemmy.ml 81 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

This argument that open source somehow needs to exploit users and blatantly skirt the intent of the GPL because profit must be taken from it is absurd.

Why is it assumed that they weren’t perfectly sustainable before and why is it the end users responsibility to bear the burden of making their business model viable if they weren’t? Being unprofitable doesn’t excuse you from following the terms of your software license.

view more: next ›

underisk

joined 2 years ago