70

Who the hell finds it fun to either waste time trying to lure them into a trap or chase them down? And it's so much worse against ai because they don't need to micro manage the way humans have to so it seems whenever I use them they get wrecked under the first half assed volly from any unit. This applies to literally any game. Who has fun with this shit?

top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 111 points 9 months ago

Repost. Stolen from an Asian news site in the 13th century.

[-] UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev 14 points 9 months ago

Which in turn reposted it from a Roman source

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 7 points 9 months ago

Fucking Parthian tryhards

[-] Varyag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 9 months ago

The age old conundrum of the unit that may or may not be strong in real combat situations, but becomes absolutely gamebreakingly busted when added to videogames, because it's strenghts translate into overwhelming advantages with none of the real life drawbacks it had to endure, usually via game design, bad balancing or games putting said units in unrealistic situations.

Take for example anti-aircraft guns since WW2. Other than the obvious real example of the FlaK88 being turned into an AT gun by the Germans, several others of these become anti-infantry or even anti-armor rapid firing nightmares in war games, because they're put well inside their optimal range and within threatening range of infantry and tanks. Which would usually destroy them from afar. The OTO Melara gun is a good modern example. Italian radar guided 110mm naval gun, was never mounted onto a proper line vehicle that was adopted by any country. But the prototypes, like the OTOMatic, absolutely terrorize every game where they appear, as a hyper accurate, rapid firing, high damage anti-everything gun.

Horse archers are just the ancient ages example of that.

[-] Artyom@lemm.ee 11 points 9 months ago

Um...archers on chariots were almost certainly extremely effective in any era they appeared. The main reason they stopped being popular in combat was because horses became big enough to ride after thousands of years of breeding.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 5 points 9 months ago

Also because they were absurdly expensive for the civilizations that were using them. The loss of their chariots to Sea People invasions and the cost of replacing them is sometimes listed among the reasons for the Bronze Age collapse of the Hittites and the decline of Egypt despite their battlefield victories.

[-] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

So you're saying we just have to add a "horse farm" minigame that has to be played every time the units are used?

[-] lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 9 months ago

Announcing the new "Royal Stables" DLC: "Marauders & Massacres" is sure to spice up your medieval farm simulation!

[-] robolemmy@lemmy.world 22 points 9 months ago

The horse archers in civ 6 are so pathetically lame that the only reason to build even one is to get 3 points toward a golden age. The computer builds swarms of them, of course, but anything can kill them, even a recon unit.

[-] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 12 points 9 months ago

I guess they wanted a change after Keshiks and Camel Archers being completely busted in Civ V.

[-] Walk_blesseD 1 points 3 months ago

And in Civ VII Keshigs are once again completely cracked.

[-] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

I am mostly talking about bannerlord and total war.

[-] Knuschberkeks@leminal.space 5 points 9 months ago

In Rome Total War they are really nicely balanced imho.

[-] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Less about balance and more about them being fun to play against

[-] Zahille7@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Would balancing not make them fun to play against?

[-] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Not really. They still take a lot of time to deal with.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 points 9 months ago

They're pretty easy to counter in Rome 2, you just need to remember it's necessary and not all-in on heavy infantry. Infantry skirmishers clap them right back to the steppes and there are good auxiliary cavalry options from the start available in Italy.

I definitely remember being frustrated when I first played it trying to chase them around with legionaries but the correct answer is don't do that then.

[-] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago

You can have a giant swarm of them though, it's fun

[-] Tagger@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

It's chess where I find they're super op - I mean seriously, the ability to no scope bishops from across the map while moving like a knight is totally unbalanced and the Devs need to too back the update.

[-] Landsharkgun@midwest.social 12 points 9 months ago

Horse archers are amazing lmao. If you're throwing them directly into the front lines they will be fucked several times over. Understand: they are merely archers that can quickly reposition. This makes them one of the best units in the game.

Deploy them to the far flank and reposition them frequently. They are excellent at drawing out the enemy cavalry so you can harass them, hit them with your own cav, etc. Big block of infanty? Harassing fire. Other horse archers? Wait for them to engage your footed archers and then deploy your horse archers to double up on them.

Their weakness, as you've noticed, is large blocks of powerful foot archers. That is what your cavalry or heavy infantry is for. Once your other forces engage, then deploy your horse archers. They're a reserve force and a force multiplier.

[-] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

That's fine. But it takes so long to deal with them that it kills my patience

[-] bouh@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Horse archers, or skirmishing units in general, are countered by archers or siege units. Unless the game is wildly unbalanced it always works.

[-] minimalfootprint@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 9 months ago

Thank you. You just gave me a flashback to Total War: Rome campaign I played as a kid. I didn't play long, because it got boring fast. I had exclusive horse archer armies that wiped out whole armies without losses.

[-] undergroundoverground@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Much like in real life, see them off with large groups of light cavalry. Meet them on their own terms with something that can chase them down and mob them.

Edit: but yeah, I find them to be largely ineffective or game breaking and nothing in-between.

[-] Randomguy@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I like them in fire emblem, I suppose they have too much range in three houses but in most games (in the franchise) they're actually pretty bad.

[-] TwoBeeSan@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Counter with archers behind anti large units. Or other cav. Get something to bog em down in range of your ranged units

My favorite anti large unit in warhammer : https://totalwarwarhammer.fandom.com/wiki/Bolt_Throwers

[-] xhrit@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

IDK. I skipped horse archers in my latest dark elves playthrough of total war warhammer 3, because they are so trash. No shields + large targets means they die really easy to missile fire, And since you can't use a longbow on horseback they lack the range to engage other archer units without taking a few volleys first.

Basically they are only good for fighting factions like undead that that have no ranged units.

[-] Carighan@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Chariot archers > horse archers

[-] Caligvla@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 9 months ago

The Huns would like a word with you.

[-] thesporkeffect@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Depends on the terrain

this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2024
70 points (100.0% liked)

Games

40590 readers
1026 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS