256
TIL it has its own wiki page.
This depressing page also exists exists: List of mass shootings in the United States in 2024
As of August 31, a total of 527 people have been killed and 1,755 people have been wounded in 432 shootings.
For 2024 (only) ugh...
If you plot it over the last 20 years it looks a lot like a Verizon coverage map. Coincidence?
Real talk, nationwide maps like that are useless. They're just the the population map.
Sadly, yes. CNN has actually made some good graphs
Optimistically this year may end up not quite as deadly as the past couple.
Edit: looks like they're counting differently however.
Edit2: they're using the Gun Violence Archive number "a nonprofit research group that tracks shootings and their characteristics in the United States, defines a mass shooting as an incident in which four or more people, excluding the perpetrator(s), are shot in one location at roughly the same time"
While Wikipedia sources from multiple lists (including VGA's) and a shooting needs to be listed in at least two for inclusion.
Well that's progress, at least?
I haven't looked into this at all. Why did it jump during COVID years? People cooped up too much?
That was likely a factor. Canada had its deadliest shooting rampage in history during that time.
Interestingly the stripe along the east coast follows the I-95 corridor.
Because I-95 follows the cities where people live. This is basically a population heatmap.
Guns are just a plague in this country.
Dumb and propagandized people are the plague, guns violence is the symptom. But yeah, it is easier to get rid of the guns, because it is hard as fuck to educate those people because they don't listen.
It seems obvious that there is no cure for idiots. The rest of the world has shown by example that less guns is the solution to endless gun violence.
Or good gun laws, like here in Czechia. We have kind of strict tests to obtain a license and lots of ways to weed out weirdos. It is also a long process so nobody can just come and buy a gun whenever they please.
Everybody is better off when a person having a bad day doesn't have a catastrophe button.
It's a moronic hobby.
Not really. It's just that not everyone should have a gun.
Guns are just ONE plague in this country...
You're the plague.
Yeah my lack of support for people having easy access to guns is the problem. Such a weird comment by you.
Not your typical mass shooting:
"Police believe multiple suspects arrived at the location in a vehicle. The suspects exited the vehicle and fired multiple shots at a group of people who were on the sidewalk of Magnolia Avenue before getting back in their vehicle and fleeing the scene.
Detectives believe the shooting was not random and stemmed from an isolated incident where multiple victims were caught in the crossfire.
In a new conference Sunday morning, Birmingham Police Chief Scott Thurmond says he believes someone was paid to kill the targeted victim, and they believe that victim is among those who died.
Police confirmed the weapons used were fully automatic. More than 100 shell casings were found at the scene, according to Chief Thurmond."
It sounds like a gang thing to me.
Totally a gang shooting.
And yet, the top comments are already reposting the same garbage.
I love how people always make it sound like we're one law away from solving all gun violence. We have 393 million guns in the hands of civilians in the US. That's more guns than people.
Guns make much of our violence worse here, sure, but pandora's box can't be closed. New laws limiting guns are often a very good idea, but distilling our problems with violence down to "guns bad, Americans so stupid" is asinine and endlessly tiresome.
Can't be solved, says only country in the world where it happens regularly.
I read Birmingham and for a second thought this might not be in the US, oh how foolish I am.
I used to think that gun laws/ownership in the US was workable, I know lots of responsible gun owners, and have shot a couple guns myself. But I'm just tired of all these mass shootings, at this point maybe we should just get rid of them.
Ya I was mass shootings in England wtf.
Letting people carry around guns all day have always seemed so stupid for me, but I'm european so different culture and all that.
A culture that recognizes common sense.
I'm all but certain these guns were already owned illegally. I'm not really sure how we can get rid of them by making them even more illegal.
The science is pretty clear; gun control works. Every time you repeal gun control laws, loosen restrictions, open gun stores, gun-related deaths escalate, often dramatically. States with higher gun ownership rates have higher rates of homicides caused by guns. Even a 1% reduction in gun related deaths would be the equivalent of 2,500 people per year. Kids die more often from gun-related deaths than car-related deaths.
Mass shootings also barely make up 1% of gun-related deaths, so the science behind them isn’t as well studied, but things like reducing magazine sizes shows a correlated relation in reduction of mass shootings.
(Some of the sauce)
Ignoring the baseless speculation on whether these are legal guns or illegal guns, since there is a pretty good spread on that spectrum:
The importance is having fewer guns overall. If the availability of legal guns is drastically reduced then it will be a lot harder for an ar-15 to fall off the back of a truck or go missing in someone's home. It won't happen overnight but it will happen pretty quickly. We have seen this happen in other "Western" nations.
Personally? I don't want to infringe on the rights of responsible gun owners. If anything, I want to make them even more responsible. What that means is that I want:
- Much stricter background checks on buying firearms. By all means, factor therapy and rehabilitation into that (just because someone had a nervous breakdown in high school shouldn't impact their ability to own a people killer so long as an accredited mental health professional signed off on it. But no "gun show loopholes" and more "cooling off periods" to ensure that NOBODY can buy a gun same day.
- Ammunition is a controlled substance. You want to buy a box of 9mm rounds? Cool, you are going to fill out a form to make sure that is tracked and you are going to be limited to a certain number of rounds per year unless you fill out the proper forms to get more (comparable to how suppressors and SBRs are handled). And, again, cooling off period. You fill out the form and a week later you can buy your bullets.
- Liability on firearms. If your gun is used in a crime then you are charged for it, regardless of whether you pulled the trigger or not. You can bet that people will be disposing of their twenty kitchen cabinet guns almost immediately once they realize they are liable for Little Timmy shooting up his school. And if a gun goes missing? You can bet they will report that within minutes of finding out (and will be checking those gun safes semi-regularly as a result).
- Liability on sellers. If a gun is used in a crime then ALL the above paperwork will be triple checked and any improper procedures will result in the seller losing their license or even being charged with negligence.
All these giant piles of "illegal guns" will dry up pretty quick (comparable to a civilized nation where they are fairly rare for criminals to use) and all the guns that kids take to school will similarly actually be locked up in a way that Little Timmy doesn't have unsupervised access to.
But all those Responsible Gun Owners(TM)? They won't be affected because clearly they are already securing their firearms when not actively in use and always know where their collection is and are making sure that only people who are also Responsible Gun Owners(TM) have access to it.
Hell, as a treat, let's let people who own public shooting ranges jump through some more hoops to relax some of that. You need 500 rounds of .223 a day to practice shooting? Buy it by the mag at Herman's Military Antiques and use it at his range. You can't take it home with you but you never needed to take it home to practice shooting, right?
But also? Public shooting ranges. no private ranges or members only rangers that let rich youtubers build up an armory. If you want the exception then you have to admit anyone who can pass a safety check (with strict penalties for those who inevitably lie to keep The Pink Haired People out) and have documentation that they are using a legally owned firearm.
Your ammunition logic sounds like the pills that actually work for colds behind pharmacies with sudafed in them and it is hilarious to think that in the land of the free we may not be able to get enough pills for our sick larger sized families but we could buy thousands of bullets with no restrixtion to shoot at everything with the fam.
You're probably right, but guns like the ones they used can be obtained legally making them much easier to be obtained illegally. I'm not an expert on gun policy, so I can't tell you how we should restrict access to guns.
Yeah no one on the planet has figured out that pickle
Pew pew Murica Pew Pew.
This is who we are, and the world should judge us accordingly for our unrepentant murderous barbarism thinly masked as "freedumb."
Don't worry my fellow Americans, our only practiced cultural value, greed, won't be injured by the latest mass shooting, it makes private gun manufacturer stocks go up, which is of course the meaning of existence.
🇺🇸💹
No good guys in Alabama either.
The news is sad, but the phrase “nightlife district in Birmingham, Alabama” is confusing and nauseating.
this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2024
256 points (100.0% liked)
News
31294 readers
2558 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS