718
submitted 1 day ago by Five@slrpnk.net to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

Attacking a civilian population of a country you're not at war with is a violation of international law.

And Isreal has done it at least nine times in the last year.

[-] LordWiggle@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago

As if Israel suddenly is going to care about international law. They have been committing war crimes and crimes against humanity for a long time now. This is telling nazis "hey, what you are doing is bad mkay?" like they would give a fuck.

[-] yournamehere@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago

absolutely. i mean it is not as shitty as cutting of the breasts of women who attended that festival back then. but I do not understand how pagers are "ordinary devices". what a joke. and why does iranian ambassador have one?

[-] LordWiggle@lemmy.world 2 points 10 minutes ago

Just because terrorists are doing horrible acts, doesn't mean you are free to do whatever you want. Crimes against humanity and war crimes do not have an asterisk saying "except when the enemy commits crimes too".

About the pagers, are they specifically made for the military? Or are they commercially available? Just because terrorists use them doesn't mean no one else does. There are still many hospitals for example using pagers. Does that make doctors terrorists or military?

[-] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 hour ago

Well yeah just add another war crime to the list.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

I find this a far more compelling view. Trapping the equipment of enemy paramilitaries seems a very strange hill to die on to paint as a war crime. On the other hand, the haphazard distribution of the pagers and the lack of care taken to minimize civilian casualties absolutely suggests this was a war crime - just not for the reason of trapping communications devices.

[-] Asidonhopo@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago

Feels like increasingly that is the new reality for all of us, everything is a potential attack vector, even if it's much less lethal attacks. Data grabs, money grabs, attention grabs. Show me something weaponizable that isn't being exploited as one in one way or another.

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 25 points 6 hours ago

All you have to do to realize that this is a terrorist attack is to close your eyes and imagine the media response if Hezbolah did this to the IDF.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 4 points 3 hours ago

If they did it to the IDF, I doubt many would have an issue with it. Military is always a valid target in war.

If it was done to random civilians, then most would.

It all hinges on just how targeted the attack is, and how much you believe Mossad's claims that it was all Hezbollah. We've seen their claims on bombing Hamas militants, and I doubt everyone in those 8 floor residential buildings were all Hamas members.

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Doubt.

If they had snuck explosives into cell phones of IDF soldiers and then detonated them in mass while the soldiers were at home with their families it would not be acceptable.

I totally agree that this attack was indiscriminate. I think part of the point was the psychological impact of being attacked that way. How could you ever feel safe again after knowing anything around you could be a small explosive device.

It is a huge escalation that will undoubtedly created another huge wave of terrorism. Israel has always been its own worst enemy.

[-] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 9 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Fucking this is not hard.

Either that is illegal, or the Unibomber was just.

[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago

Yes. But do pants! That would be fun....

ok sir your shoes go in this bin. We want your pants, underwear and belt in that other one. Those will be returned to you after the flight reaches Michigan.....

Oh. We're sorry sir, your luggage is here, but your pants, belt and underwear were flown to Michoacan. Very common occurrence. You may take this pair of paper pants with our Logo while we wait for several connection flights for your belongings...

[-] ehxor@lemmy.ca 6 points 5 hours ago

Thanks for sharing this. My gut reaction is that that these attacks were unreasonable and careless in who they impacted and should be criminal. But it’s very interesting to read an analysis of the actual law - even if I don’t agree with it

[-] gedhrel@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

It comes to the same conclusion regarding the illegality of the weapons, even if it's pretty lenient in its interpretation of how thousands of devices can be "reasonably expected" to all end up in the hands of combatants.

[-] xhrit@lemmy.world 14 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Encrypted communications equipment purchased for military use are not ordinary devices, and under international law if a device is used for military transmissions it is a valid target and can be attacked.

[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 19 points 8 hours ago

Many were not used by the military and the explosions happened during the day in uncontrolled circumstances. Many civilians got hurt.

[-] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago

under international law if a device is used for military transmissions it is a valid target and can be attacked.

I think this means that if an Israeli sells you a phone, they become a valid target for military strikes.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2024
718 points (100.0% liked)

News

22903 readers
3079 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS