[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 9 points 9 hours ago

You're in c/fuckcars buddy. Read the room.

[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 9 points 11 hours ago

She doesn't need to support an embargo. All she has to do is to say that the US is going to follow its own laws. As a former prosecutor, all she has to do is be the law and order candidate.

[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 10 points 13 hours ago

Are you actually claiming there was no media coverage of the murdered hostages?

There is a very good argument that the role of non mainstream news sources, like the Intercept, it to shed light on the news that mainstream media doesn't raise.

If the CNN was blasting 24 hours the news about this American being shot, I'm pretty sure the Intercept would not bother either.

120
submitted 14 hours ago by theacharnian@lemmy.ca to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/28449417

Canadian mega landlord using AI ‘pricing scheme’ as it massively hikes rents

[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago

Oppose war crimes, ethnic cleansing and potentially genocide = "satisfy the peanut gallery" and "optics".

There's something wrong with your moral compass, buddy.

[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 day ago

Hey that's exactly the thing they've been doing with the settlements and the two state solution. Who would have thought they would use that strategy AGAIN?!

[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 37 points 2 days ago

Border guards successfully repel incursion with minimal casualties.

FTFY

[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 days ago

I honestly have no idea how any Lemmy comment might be helpful at reducing the murders of women.

[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 days ago

Wtf are you talking about. What a weird thing to write. I'm very much not OK with being murdered thank you very much.

[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 days ago

The person going to the window on second 3 approaches the car after the car has charged the cyclist and screeching breaked during seconds 1-2 of the video.

And even then the most likely explanation is that the person approaching is trying to tell him "hey man you can't go that way.

Finally, you talk about "approaching the window " as some kind of threat. Only a perpetually terrified Karen would freak out for that.

[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago

The start of the interaction, where the idiot driver starts the fight is at second 3 of the posted video. The guy charges a cyclist on an empty road and hits the breaks. He could just have U turned and gone on with his day. But he chose to start a fight. What happened afterwards I'm sure is a series of unfortunate choices by everyone involved. But the whole thing would not have started if on the second 2 the idiot had made a different, non-belligerent choice.

[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 days ago

The protestors were protesting. This idiot could have turned around but he chose to start a fight. Once a fight starts, well, it's a fight. The video is damning for him even more.

[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 112 points 2 days ago

End femicide!

42
submitted 5 days ago by theacharnian@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
205
submitted 1 week ago by theacharnian@lemmy.ca to c/world@lemmy.world
27
submitted 2 weeks ago by theacharnian@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
20
submitted 3 weeks ago by theacharnian@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
15
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by theacharnian@lemmy.ca to c/anarchism@slrpnk.net

Discussions about scarcity and anarchism that I've seen online seem to always talk about "scarcity in the large", i.e. how does an anarchist society allocate production, food, labour, materials etc.

I've a question about anarchism and scarcity in the small. Say, a really nice location, eg. a breezy location in a very hot climate, or the room with the nice windows in the community centre, or Bag End at the top of the hill. Say, an anarchist community has decided to use the location for purpose X, but a minority wants to use it for purpose Y. Maybe an even smaller minority wants to do Z, and a bunch of other people have their own little ideas about how to use it. Some are transient and could be accommodated (you get it on Tuesdays 5-7) but others might not be ("our sculpture project needs to dry out in that specific spot for the next 4 months, we know it blocks the view but it's the only place the breeze hits just right!") or could be contradictory (the siesta people vs the loud backgammon players can't both use the spot at high noon) or antagonistic (the teenagers who want to party late vs the new parents who need quiet for the babies). And dis-association doesn't really help here because that's the nice spot for many kilometers around or there is literally no way to create another beach for our small island community because that's literally the only place on the island where sand exists, so we can't just off and leave. (* Many of these examples are imagining a hot summer in an anarchist Greece, sorry it's almost August.)

It looks to me like a simple non-life-and-death scenario like this could potentially completely poison and destroy a community and in the face of that it would be the little death of anti-authoritarian organizing. Like yea, when life and death matters are at hand, anarchists will band together and conquer the bread. But petty small-scale little shit where it's managing annoyances and small grievances, I don't think non-authoritarian decision making can solve. And I suspect it's crap like this that has killed off many intentional communities and experiments or made them veer away from non-hierarchical, anti-authoritarian organizing.

Have anarchist thinkers seriously thought of this?

37
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by theacharnian@lemmy.ca to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
69
submitted 2 months ago by theacharnian@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca

Submitting for this truly astonishing quote:

" Landlords in Quebec, however, feel they need to catch up to other provinces as Quebec is still one of the most affordable places to live in the country, said Jean-Olivier Reed, a spokesperson for the Quebec Landlord Association (APQ)."

7
submitted 2 months ago by theacharnian@lemmy.ca to c/quebec@lemmy.ca

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/23000968

Incapables de trouver du travail en français au Nouveau-Brunswick, ils pensent partir au Québec

3
submitted 2 months ago by theacharnian@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
127
submitted 3 months ago by theacharnian@lemmy.ca to c/world@lemmy.world
129
submitted 4 months ago by theacharnian@lemmy.ca to c/world@lemmy.world
view more: next ›

theacharnian

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF