774
submitted 4 months ago by Five@slrpnk.net to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 46 points 4 months ago

Several of the victims were children. They went off in crowds. There was no way they could control that many devices with precision when they set them off all at once like that.

[-] crashfrog@sopuli.xyz 17 points 4 months ago

https://x.com/osint613/status/1837614316335648888?s=46

Here’s an example of how targeted the strike was, despite literally going off in a crowd - nobody hurt but the intended target, no harm whatsoever beyond two feet. Doesn’t even bruise an apple

[-] archomrade@midwest.social 32 points 4 months ago

That particular pager was in a bag, against a person, pointed away from anyone or anything else. Not to mention anything of the second attack, which used much larger charges and started fires and blew out windows across Lebanon.

And anyway, a single example isn't going to assuage anyone who has been reading reports of women and children dying from the attack.

[-] prole 13 points 4 months ago

They're also ignoring the literal terror being experienced by civilians who witnessed people's legs and faces being blown off in public.

That's terrorism.

[-] crashfrog@sopuli.xyz 10 points 4 months ago

That particular pager was in a bag, against a person, pointed away from anyone or anything else.

Where else would you carry a pager? You have to feel it when it vibrates.

Not to mention anything of the second attack, which used much larger charges and started fires and blew out windows across Lebanon.

Well, I’m sorry to hear that Lebanon’s glazers just got several months of guaranteed work, I guess, but I’m otherwise not sure why this is relevant.

And anyway, a single example isn't going to assuage anyone who has been reading reports of women and children dying from the attack.

What reports?

[-] archomrade@midwest.social 18 points 4 months ago

I’m otherwise not sure why this is relevant.

Because you were claiming the explosions were too small to "bruise and apple"

What reports?

Literally any reports on the subject

[-] crashfrog@sopuli.xyz 6 points 4 months ago

Because you were claiming the explosions were too small to "bruise and apple"

ok, and how is that refuted by the physical description of an ambulance?

[-] archomrade@midwest.social 12 points 4 months ago

What the fuck are you smoking

[-] crashfrog@sopuli.xyz 6 points 4 months ago

You posted a description of an ambulance, down to the color of its lights and the presence of people standing nearby looking on.

What was the relevance of that?

[-] prole 13 points 4 months ago

The mental gymnastics people will do to defend literal state sponsored terrorism.

And don't waste your time, I actually know what those words mean.

[-] crashfrog@sopuli.xyz 8 points 4 months ago

Yes, it’s pretty shocking how people have come out in support of an Iranian-funded terrorist group that has killed women, children, and a hundred Americans

[-] prole 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Try harder.

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Oh look, it is time for round two: Strawman Boogaloo.

[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

As opposed to the American-funded terrorist state that has killed women, children and a couple thousands of Palestinian civilians?

[-] crashfrog@sopuli.xyz 13 points 4 months ago

Several of the victims were children.

The fathers of these dead children will simply have to live with the terrible consequences of their involvement with antisemitic terror (who are we kidding, they don’t care.)

They went off in crowds.

In every such case only the agent was harmed. You’re proving how targeted the attack was.

[-] Stubb@lemmy.sdf.org 37 points 4 months ago

The fathers of these dead children will simply have to live with the terrible consequences of their involvement with antisemitic terror

So the children have to pay for their father's crimes? This isn't really a justification, and they don't not care, now they have a real reason for retaliation—starting the cycle of hate all over again.

[-] crashfrog@sopuli.xyz 9 points 4 months ago

So the children have to pay for their father's crimes?

No, they don’t have to. But they will when their fathers deliberately put them in danger.

Again, he’ll just have to live with the tragic consequences (just kidding, we know he doesn’t care.)

[-] AreaSIX@lemm.ee 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

And you complain about pro Israel accounts getting banned. Literally justifying the murder of children should be banable no matter what county you're supporting. Despicable behavior that everyone now sadly expects from rabid genocide supporters.

[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 28 points 4 months ago

The kid's blood is still on whoever triggered the devices hands. The child didn't do anything.

Do you have a source stating that no bystanders were harmed? I can't find anything making that claim.

[-] irreticent@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Do you have a source stating that no bystanders were harmed?

They keep citing a tweet while others keep refuting what they're saying with articles from BBC, NPR, and other news outlets. There's no point in arguing with someone that can't provide reputable sources for their claims.

*Edit: typo

[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 5 points 4 months ago

But they have a video of a single incident!

[-] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

At least it was somewhat targeted, unlike Gaza.

this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2024
774 points (100.0% liked)

News

24317 readers
3523 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS