265
submitted 3 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] orclev@lemmy.world 115 points 3 months ago

What are the odds of Khelif winning a defamation lawsuit against Boebert? She's falsely accusing her of being trans and therefore being ineligible to participate in women's boxing.

[-] nickhammes@lemmy.world 62 points 3 months ago

Well an Olympic athlete is probably a public figure in this context, so she'd need to show that Boebert defamed her "with knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not."

Pretty good, I'd wager.

[-] Mirshe@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Remember there's a harm component as well - Khelif is Algerian, where being outed as LGBTQIA of any stripe can get you killed by the state.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

It's a little more complicated than that:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imane_Khelif

"In March 2023, Khelif competed for the gold medal in the finals at the IBA Women's World Boxing Championships; however, she was disqualified shortly before her gold medal bout against Chinese boxer Yang Liu for failing to meet the International Boxing Association's (IBA) eligibility criteria. According to the Algerian Olympic Committee, Khelif was disqualified due to medical reasons; later reports indicated her testosterone levels were too high to compete.[21][22] Uzbekistani boxer Navbakhor Khamidova was awarded the bronze medal instead of Imane Khelif.[23]

In 2023, IBA president Umar Kremlev said that the disqualifications were because DNA tests "proved they had XY chromosomes".[24][25] The Washington Post stated, "It remains unclear what standards Khelif and Lin Yu Ting failed [in 2023] to lead to the disqualifications",[25][26] further writing, "There never has been evidence that [...] Khelif [...] had XY chromosomes or elevated levels of testosterone."[25] The IBA did not reveal the testing methodology, stating the "specifics remain confidential".[27]"

[-] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 72 points 3 months ago

Why does matter? She’s not transgender in any way, making Boeberts claims false.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Boebert isn't the first person to make the claim and they have been sanctioned previously. Like I say, it's a complex matter.

[-] KLISHDFSDF@lemmy.ml 51 points 3 months ago

I would disagree. When the right (known liars like Boebert, Trump, Logan Paul, etc) continuously lie about anything to try to rile up their base, I say it's imperative to completely disregard their opinions unless someone trusted is making the accusations. This is what they expect, this is exactly what they want. We need to ignore them. Not even bring it up. Keep them fringe and outcast them as weirdos. They bring nothing good to the table but lies, hatred, and divisiveness.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

I would say the head of her boxing federation is a trusted source. That's what makes this complicated.

"In 2023, IBA president Umar Kremlev said that the disqualifications were because DNA tests "proved they had XY chromosomes".[24][25]"

Reportedly the XY test was false, but at the same time, they aren't releasing the methodology that allowed them to say she has XY chromosomes.

[-] SuperIce@lemmy.world 32 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

You mean the boxing federation filled corruption and that was disqualified by the Olympics?

[-] ajoebyanyothername@lemmy.world 32 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I would disagree. As another poster pointed out, there are serious questions about the integrity of the IBA, not least the fact that they aren't recognised by the IOC. To suggest that the IOC wouldn't have clear eligibility criteria feels at best misguided.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] KLISHDFSDF@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago

The president of the IBA (Umar Kremlev) is a Russian in a position of privilege, a position that is easily influence by Putin's agenda (who hate anything pro LGBTQ+). I would argue, with plenty of facts to back it up, that the IBA is compromised and is unable to have a neutral stance on this matter.

Under Kremlev's tenure as IBA head, he has heavily marketed himself, moved the IBA's operations to Russia, suspended Ukraine from the IBA, and made the Russian state-owned energy giant Gazprom the sole sponsor of the IBA... The IOC stated that the IBA had failed to address governance, finance and corruption concerns.

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umar_Kremlev

[-] rainynight65@feddit.org 44 points 3 months ago

There is absolutely nothing complex about this matter. A woman had a physical advantage over another woman, and is immediately suspected of not being a 'real woman'. This shit is as old as time itself, and it would never happen to a man.

[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago

It's a little complicated. The Italian boxer who faced Imane in the last match said she "had never been punched that hard before" and had to resign in the first minute.

There's no proof of an Y chromosome, the test Imane failed was just for testosterone (which might be natural). I'm not a doctor, but couldn't that just be from doping or something? She's from Algeria, which has only won like 17 Olympic medals total, which could encourage cheating. It would explain her punches being stronger.

[-] rainynight65@feddit.org 25 points 3 months ago

Oh fuck off. For one, it's not even clear whether higher testosterone levels really give an athlete that much of an edge - many high level male athletes have comparatively low testosterone levels. Secondly, the forms of doping that involve testosterone are not manifesting themselves purely in higher testosterone levels - there are other tests for that. If there was any suspicion that this athlete was doping, they'd run the gamut on her - note how many athletes were already suspended this year, and they're not from comparatively poor countries like Algeria.

If a male boxer beats an opponent to a pulp, then we collectively shrug and move on. Oh well, he was just better. Poor matchmaking. But when it involves women, suddenly there must be something wrong with the athlete who, applying Occam's Razor, simply was stronger.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 15 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

she "had never been punched that hard before"

Didn't at least one person say the same thing about Mike Tyson?

Being better than everyone else might mean cheating, but it also might mean they are just better. No way for us plebs on the ground to know. It sounds like the IBC has not fostered enough trust to be taken at their word.

That being the case, it seems reasonable to take Imane's word for it until the matter can be settled by a trustworthy body.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] tortina_original@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

There is nothing complex about it.

[-] takeda@lemmy.world 54 points 3 months ago

IBA was itself disqualified for corruption and being slanted pro Russia.

They never provided evidence to their claims, and can you imagine that this disqualification was involved right after she won against a Russian boxer?

Why didn't they do it after she won against Nigerian (IIRC) boxer? Or what about her losing 9 times to other women?

[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

Yup. This is the important context.

[-] Sidyctism2@discuss.tchncs.de 30 points 3 months ago

from this article:

She had previously competed without issues and was disqualified by the sport’s governing body only after she defeated Russian boxer Azalia Amineva in the 2023 tournament. The IBA is controlled by Umar Kremlev, who is Russian and brought in the state-owned energy supplier Gazprom as its primary sponsor and moved much of the governing body’s operations to Russia.

This week, the IOC described it as “a sudden and arbitrary decision by the IBA” in which Khelif and Lin Yu-ting of Taiwan “were suddenly disqualified without any due process.” Lin was suspended for failing to meet unspecified eligibility requirements in a biochemical test.

The reasons for the two disqualifications are extremely murky, as is almost always the case with the IBA. The governing body has revealed little about the nature of the tests, including what was tested and who tested it. This lack of transparency would be unacceptable in major Olympic sports, and the IBA has been banned from the Olympics since 2019.

[-] Dantpool@kbin.melroy.org 6 points 3 months ago

It's not more complicated. Following emphasis mine.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Boxing_Association

AIBA TO IBA: "In December 2021, the abbreviated name was changed to IBA in an attempt to rebrand the organisation and distance itself from the former administration."

"...The organization has been involved in multiple corruption scandals including on several editions of the Summer Olympic Games. In December 2017, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) expressed concerns about the governance of AIBA..."

"...In September 2021, an independent report found that bouts leading up to and during the 2016 Rio Olympics had been manipulated. To investigate boxing at the 2016 Summer Olympics and potential corruption of the AIBA, Canadian lawyer Professor Richard McLaren was appointed by AIBA to conduct a three-stage investigation. The report found bouts had been manipulated for money (up to $250,000), the perceived benefit of AIBA..."

"The IOC had been alarmed by the fact that the IBA's only sponsor is a Russian state-run energy giant Gazprom that supports the Russian invasion of Ukraine"

"In February 2023, USA Boxing announced its decision to boycott the 2023 World Championships (organized by the International Boxing Association)..., also accusing the IBA of attempting to sabotage IOC-approved qualification pathway for the 2024 Summer Olympics."

The IBA is a corrupt organization, funded by a Russian, state-run, company. Them disqualifying someone carries no weight.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

I'd argue that allegations of corruption in the league, in fact, makes the whole issue MORE complicated, not less complicated. ;)

[-] x4740N@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

IBA has Russian ties and has not provided evidence for that claim that wikipedia sources

The fact that you are a mod of this sub too but you spread misinformation on it is disgusting

Stop spreading transphobic and sexist misinformation

[-] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 42 points 3 months ago

Maybe she should move to Italy with the rest of the fascist weirdos that are upset about sex, gender, and ????.

[-] pedz@lemmy.ca 35 points 3 months ago

Wasn't MTG doing crossfit? Maybe they should look into it. She could be not feminine enough for conservatives if she has been doing 'men activities' involving strength and muscles. Maybe MTG is secretly a men! Just sayin.

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

I'd say A men to that!

[-] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago

Same woman who was accused of spending 60k of campaign funds for personal expenses. She's incapable of spending her own money for causes. It's almost like she doesn't actually believe in anything.

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago

That’s a LOT of handies.

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago
[-] Leviathan@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

They're implying she's raising money by performing hand jobs.

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I was half-awake and read "handles". I even read it a couple times and searched the article trying to understand.

Thanks.

[-] Leviathan@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Haha that's cool, the tired is real. Glad I could help.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 3 months ago

Further context is that she was recorded fondling a guy while vaping at a musical and got ejected. He was also groping her.

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

Carpet bagger performing handjobs in a public theater.

[-] SuperSaiyanSwag@lemmy.zip 15 points 3 months ago

Bigots are bigots for a reason, but what irks me more about this issue is that once they are proven wrong they just double down instead of admitting that they were mistaken. Not trying to excuse their transphobia, but after the initial dumb outrage they could’ve just moved on quietly after learning that she was born a female and I would’ve just thought of them as usual dumb-asshole-bigots, but noooooo, they just have to lower the bar even more.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

LGBTQ Nation Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [Medium] (Click to view Full Report)

Name: LGBTQ Nation Bias: Left
Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual
Country: United States of America
Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/lgbtq-nation/

Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News


Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
Please consider supporting them by donating.

Footer

Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago
[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 3 months ago

Sad, potato-brained idiot.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2024
265 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19097 readers
2775 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS