[-] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

That’s a very interesting poll because in the end HRC got 48 percent of the vote, or 2 percentage points more than in this poll, while DT got 46 percent, 11 percent more than in the poll. One explanation could be that undecided, Johnson and Stein voters changed their minds and (mostly) voted for Trump.

[-] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I don’t believe that, even in the face of a full coup, (gun) violence will solve any issues. There’s just no way that a majority of people support a violent militia taking over power of the government, no matter how illegitimate some think that government is.

As examples, look at the recent coup attempt in Turkey, or the Wagner uprising in Russia. In both cases the violent uprisings were used by the dictator to cement his power. Guns will not help you.

[-] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Why?? Every time someone uses political violence the would be dictator becomes more popular and he can make the state more repressive. Even right now, there will be idiot undecided voters that will change their vote to him because some idiot tried to kill him. There are really no upsides to attempting to remove tyrants with guns.

[-] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

But then with how partisan judges are now, you would get completely random rulings. Better than what we have now I guess, but in theory you could have two landmark cases against, for example, Roe v Wade, and the SC might handle these challenges completely differently depending on composition.

[-] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

The issue with (the most important parts of the) voting rights act was that it only applied to states with a history of racism. Expand it to cover all states and in theory the argument of the SC breaks down. Of course, they may well come up with a different line of reasoning, but a Democratic congress should at least try.

[-] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

People don’t realize just how close presidential elections are. In CA during the last election 35 percent voted Trump. Clearly that’s a landslide win for Biden, but it still implies that even in the most liberal state in the US 6 million people voted for a facist.

[-] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago

He is also making such a bs argument. Does anybody believe that Maduro lets out criminals in the hope that they will cross the Dorian gap to go to the US? That makes no sense. It’s much more likely that those criminals, once let out of prisons, remain in Venezuela.

[-] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 26 points 5 days ago

Insane double standards. When was the last time Trump did an interview outside of Fox and Friends?

[-] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 17 points 6 days ago

Also, especially since your body remains on earth. Does your soul have genitalia?

[-] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 72 points 1 month ago

Why does matter? She’s not transgender in any way, making Boeberts claims false.

[-] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 59 points 3 months ago

What I get from this is that the most populous country in the world has essentially unliveable temperatures. And this is only the early parts of global warming. Scary times ahead.

[-] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 124 points 7 months ago

Many issues with this headline, but one of them is the word journalist, which implies some form of neutrality. The headline should either be a L out a journalist that writes about antifa, or a pro-facism activist. I suspect from the context (Fox) that it’s the latter.

view more: next ›

Eatspancakes84

joined 1 year ago