307
submitted 3 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Trump says ‘you’re voting for the president … you’re voting for me’ when asked about vice-presidential pick

Donald Trump has said that vice presidential picks have “virtually no impact” on elections when asked about JD Vance’s fitness for office, in an apparent attempt to downplay his running mate’s role on the Republican ticket.

Trump made the comments during a combative interview at the annual convention of the National Association of Black Journalists (NABJ) in Chicago. Asked by the Fox News journalist Harris Faulkner whether Vance would be ready to take over “on day one, if he has to be”, Trump avoided answering directly and instead downplayed the significance of the Vance’s role.

all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 80 points 3 months ago

i love how vance went from never-trumper to fellating trump with the insatiable appetite of a pitbull in a NICU, even knowing full well trump would throw him out the window like a big mac wrapper without a second thought

[-] Assman@sh.itjust.works 24 points 3 months ago

with the insatiable appetite of a pitbull in a NICU

I'm dying 💀

[-] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 18 points 3 months ago

Big Mac wrapper really got me, beautiful imagery.

Really great writing OP

[-] OminousOrange@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 months ago

Don't big macs come in boxes?

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

Isn't a box just a cardboard wrapper?

[-] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago

I'm happy to say I have no clue, never had a big mac

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 22 points 3 months ago

There's an axiom in the workplace. "A's" hire other A's, and B's hire C's. Kennedy picked LBJ, one of the savviest wheeler dealers in the Senate for his Veep; Nixon got Spiro Agnew, whose main qualification was that he was a pit bull.

Trump chose Vance and Pence for the same reason; neither could be a threat. Both took the job because they knew they'd never rise higher on their own.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

LBJ was in on the hit.

What, he was.

[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 18 points 3 months ago

There’s a non-zero chance that old, fat, hateful, felonious rapist dies in the next four years. There’s no way he could become president any other way. It's not like the weird couch fucker had dignity before this.

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 15 points 3 months ago

they're going to need to hire 24/7 security for his grave to keep people from shitting on it

[-] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Don't tell them that, you'll ruin the party I'm planning.

[-] xantoxis@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

He already has the world's best 24/7 security and people are still getting shots off at him. That grave is toast.

[-] anonymouse2@sh.itjust.works 78 points 3 months ago
[-] dhork@lemmy.world 28 points 3 months ago

Hmm. Sarah Palin is only 60. Dan Quayle is older, at 77.

But it is possible that JD, at 39, might be their illegitimate love child.

[-] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 3 months ago

Pretty sure Vance is the fly from the last VP debate.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Don’t underestimate Vance’s maniacal potential. He’s definitely more of a Cheney than a Quayle.

[-] ccunning@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

“You say tomatoe, I say tomatoe”

EDIT: Damnit. I got the 32yo joke wrong. It was Potatoe… 🫠

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

I have a hard time believing Trump would be the pushover Bush was. Though he is easily manipulated, so maybe.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

He’ll support any policies that will yield him money or fame. The entirety of his person is for sale.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

But he would also lose his mind if everyone was saying that JD Vance and Stephen Miller were really running the show like everyone did with Cheney and Rove.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

JD is doing his best to upstage that act.

Really too bad the theater went to the dreamloungers. He’s too distracted to remember his lines.

[-] Sumocat@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

Ugh. Up until he chose Palin, I would’ve been fine with McCain winning. I was for Obama, not against McCain, and then he went and f***ed it all up.

[-] ccunning@lemmy.world 38 points 3 months ago

I mean they have at least enough impact for your followers to try and murder your last one…

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 38 points 3 months ago

Well, regardless of who Kamala taps as VP, I'm pretty sure we don't have to worry about them fucking the couch in the Oval Office...

So I'd say it matters.

[-] aviationeast@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Well now she could choose Vance...

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago
[-] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago

True, but for how much longer? We can only hope that trump goes through a few VPs before November.

[-] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 27 points 3 months ago

That was bad, asked if JD Vance was ready to be president, Trump says he doesn't matter.

[-] kibiz0r@midwest.social 23 points 3 months ago

Dude was almost assassinated and says his pick as successor doesn’t matter. Dawg…

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 6 points 3 months ago

The weirdo almost assassinates himself with every hamburger he eats

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago

Everyone is saying that donnie is too old to run and should just step down. After this, they are saying it even more.

[-] Today@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

At the end he said, "if you like me i win. If you don't like me i don't win."

I was shocked that he actually appeared to be living in reality for a moment.

[-] eee@lemm.ee 11 points 3 months ago

The best endorsement this poor guy can get is "he's not that important anyway" 😂😂 Old Weirdo accidentally gave his running mate the sickest burn of them all lol

[-] Nobody@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

Clearly, the VP of an 80-year-old presidential candidate isn’t a position that might come with some authority down the road. The Oval Office couches are perfectly safe.

[-] logicbomb@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

The VP actually has a great deal of Constitutional power already, as the Constitution declares them to be President of the Senate, with the power to cast a tie-breaking vote. Their ability to be Presiding Officer of the Senate, I would argue makes the VP more powerful than a normal Senator. The fact that modern VPs choose not to use this power, I think demonstrates that the VP actually has a lot more power than people realize.

[-] Myxomatosis@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

Grouchy old groper is embarrassed by carpet-bagging couch-fucker. News at noon.

[-] tiefling 4 points 3 months ago

Don't forget dolphin-wanker

[-] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Laughs in McCain

[-] Plopp@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

So what would be the consequences of Trump picking a new VP? I've heard people say he can't and it's not allowed, but clearly those things seem to have no effect on him, so what would actually stop him and what would the consequences actually be?

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Trump has already been formally nominated, and because of how we vote for electors for President and VP as a combined ticket, Vance has been formally nominated as well. If Trump decides to discard him like a used frat couch, then the Republicans would have to deal with deadlines in individual states to re-file paperwork.

We learned from the uncertainty regarding Biden's run that the first firm deadlines will start popping up next week. They are in Red states, though, so they are likely to give deference to Trump that they would not have given to a Democrat. Still, if Trump changes the upholstery too late, he may find that Vance is still on the ballot in a few states.

[-] nickhammes@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Which could potentially create a situation if Trump were to win, where his electoral votes are split across JD Vance, and thanks to the 12th amendment, the Senate picks the VP, and selects Harris's running mate. If Jon Tester keeps his seat in Montana, which doesn't seem super unlikely, this probably means a 50-50 Senate, with the VP keeping it in the Dems' control.

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

so what would actually stop him and what would the consequences actually be?

Officially? Probably not much, especially since republicans do their best to skirt the law wherever possible.

Unofficially? His pride, because he'd have to admit that he made a bad decision, and all the memes making fun of dementia Don's dumb decisions. Especially since it's yet another instance where their own rhetoric can be used against them, and they'll keep floundering with their messaging.

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

The Guardian Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [Medium] (Click to view Full Report)

Name: The Guardian Bias: Left-Center
Factual Reporting: Mixed
Country: United Kingdom
Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-guardian/

Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News


Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
Please consider supporting them by donating.

Footer

Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.

[-] crusa187@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago

Perhaps not with Pence.

The couch-fucker is a different story however.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Let's all repeat the Trump Supporter's Oath!

Everyone! Who supports trump! Gets shit on! No Exceptions!

[-] wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io 1 points 3 months ago

Tell it to Kamala

this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2024
307 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3993 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS