617
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world

Hard to imagine anything much weirder than wanting to present oneself as racist in front of an African-American journalists association. Pretty much guaranteed to get a hostile reception when you do that.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] simplejack@lemmy.world 146 points 1 month ago

Two races? In one person?!

Wut what whaaaaa?!

[-] tiefling 98 points 1 month ago

Wait until they learn about Taco Bell Pizza Huts

[-] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

Your comment made me lol out loud.

[-] PythagreousTitties@lemm.ee 35 points 1 month ago

They're both quoting John Stewart

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Steve@startrek.website 11 points 1 month ago

Remember when Italians were a boogyman race?

[-] dariusj18@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Racists today are just lazy, relying on skin color to discriminate. Back in the day the Irish weren't "white". The IRISH!

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Bless Jon Stewart.

[-] Wogi@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

ENEMIES EVERYWHEEEERE

sorry, but I see what what whaaaat and I can only think of Halo enemies and their delightful banter.

[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 6 points 1 month ago

Grunts were great. I still get amused at the reaction to a plasma grenade stuck to them. "Not again!"

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] AmidFuror@fedia.io 134 points 1 month ago

Trump: “A Black job is anybody that has a job,” Trump said. “That’s what it is. Anybody that has a job.”

And Biden didn't make sense?

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 63 points 1 month ago

He's trying to deal with his own previous statement, which implied that Blacks can only aspire to holding some kinds of jobs.

[-] AmidFuror@fedia.io 34 points 1 month ago

I'm familiar with him saying that before. I was surprised he hadn't come up with an answer to the "what are black jobs" question since it has been all over the media in response to his prior claim. But I guess he's too lazy or stupid to think ahead like that.

My comment was more directed at his nonsensical answer. First, if a black job is any job, then why specify it? Second, how can the answer to "what is a black job" be that it is a person?

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

But Biden had a raspy voice!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago

Such an obvious question he was going to get, and he has a slam dunk answer he could give. "Black people are historically oppressed, they are disproportionately in lower-education fields and thus disproportionately at risk of losing their job when there is an influx of lower-education workers." It's actually a fine pitch, but you can't actually make it while also appealing to White Nationalists.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 101 points 1 month ago

Has anyone commented just how plain weird this guy is? I mean don't get me wrong, he's old, he's tremendously old, but he's also just SO weird, right?

[-] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 1 month ago

This guy, and let me tell you some people really say it, is the absolute, no really he is and I'm telling you the truth, you wouldn't believe it, they say he is weird and nobody else is weirder.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Tears in their eyes, they come to me and they say, "sir, oh sir" and did I mention these are BIG men okay, motorcycle men, crying, and they've never cried before because they are so tough and so big, okay? So they say to me, they say, "sir! You're weird and old, sir" and it's true okay, like you've never seen. [Fart]

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 82 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That interview was uncomfortable to watch.

He literally set the tone right from the start of the interview. "You are (women, black, minorities, insert slur of choice here), and you are to be put in your place. I am better than you. I am above you. And I will treat you accordingly."

And he did that multiple times through the interview. When talking about Harris being a "DEI Hire", not only did his answer seem to side with racists, but he attacked the interviewer. When being asked one question he didn't like, he responded by randomly attacking one of the other interviewers about absolutely nothing in particular. Even when one of them started kowtowing to him, he still attacked her over random "equipment issues" that she had nothing to do with. When trying to get the interview back on track, he snapped at one and told her no, he'll do what he wants.

And one of the things that I noticed that made me particularly uneasy. At the end of the interview, one of the interviewers tried to ask about Project 2025, only to immediately be cut off by another interviewer "per the Trump team." There could be a scheduling reason if they ran out of time, but go back and watch it. It's at the very end. It gives off the impression that under absolutely no circumstances was Project 2025 to be discussed, based on Trump's demands. That's very unsettling.

And honestly, I don't even think this was ever supposed to even appeal to black voters. I can't see a single minority watching that interview and saying "Yup, that's my guy!". But think of the message it does send. It's telling the people that he's relying on most that "Watch me put these women in their place, just like I'll put the in their place. This time, I will hurt the right people!" (Edit: this seems to be the prevailing opinion; Al Sharpton among others is saying that the real purpose was to show the MAGA base that he's willing to bring the racism to "them" on their own turf, in order to throw some red meat their way and make sure they stay in line.)

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] modifier@lemmy.ca 59 points 1 month ago

It's beyond even racism. For someone have the utter mayonnaise to gatekeep someone's inclusion in an identity that you're entirely outside of, that sense of entitlement has to come from somewhere. A sense of superiority, perhaps. Supremacy even.

And if we know anything about Donald at this point, it's that he has mayonnaise pumpining through his very veins.

[-] DrSleepless@lemmy.world 59 points 1 month ago

He’s a creep, he’s a weirdo

[-] Jomega@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Don't bring my favorite song into this.

[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

And he smells

[-] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 50 points 1 month ago

Asked what he meant when he once said immigrants were taking “Black jobs,” he said: “A Black job is anybody who has a job.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/31/us/politics/trump-kamala-harris-black-nabj.html?unlocked_article_code=1._U0.qv4W.xUpTQvywCkh9&smid=url-share

that's our stable genius right there 😆

[-] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 44 points 1 month ago

I have a job so my pasty ass is black now apparently

[-] DrSleepless@lemmy.world 39 points 1 month ago

Oh so you suddenly turned black just like Kamala

[-] HRDS_654@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Yeah, but only when it's convenient. Like what the MAGA ass hats are saying about Kamala.

[-] BossDj@lemm.ee 36 points 1 month ago

When he blamed the journalist for equipment problems. Pointed at her and goes "this woman". Jesus.

[-] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 40 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

yeah, audio equipment... 😂

"About 45 minutes before Trump took the stage, the former president pushed back on NABJ staffers who wanted to live fact check the event, according to a person familiar with the planning. The board pushed back against the last minute demand. When Trump took the stage, he said the delay was due to NABJ’s audio issues."

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/07/31/us/harris-trump-election/63279198-d063-5804-9ae8-b473bd547522?smid=url-share

[-] ResoluteCatnap@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago

Imagine asking a room full of journalists to not live fact check you 🤣

[-] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 36 points 1 month ago
[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 month ago
[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago

Wait until his numbers go down even more. Then you'll see racist Don.

[-] Chocrates@lemmy.world 48 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I never thought I'd see the day, that he is on the backfoot. Kamala has him shook.

In the span of a week I've gone from doom scrolling to excitement. I hope the Dems don't fuck it up.

[-] HRDS_654@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

While I do agree I also want to make it clear I'm not expecting a revolution if Kamala is elected. I'm excited for the chance to get off the back foot and hope our country can start making progress again. It may be cynical, but I pretty much expect second term Obama again.

For more information on what I'm talking about check out FD Signifier's video about Kamala. I don't agree with everything he said, but he has good points.

[-] Chocrates@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

I totally agree. I remember all those years ago and Kamala was too conservative for me, but after nearly 10 years of this I am humbled. She will be status quo leaning towards green policies, but not a democratic socialist revolutionary. I'm still fucking excited! Maybe the most I have been since I could vote.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

It truly is amazing. A little over a week now and if Kamala isn't the favorite she soon will be. Money, enthusiasm and volunteers ramping at unreal speed. Fast

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

His numbers will go back up with Repubs if he does a hard R.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

The fact that so many people love this weird dumbass grandpa... 🤦‍♂️

[-] ATDA@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Chef's kiss. No notes. Wouldn't have had it go any other way.

Next to watching maralago burn down I'm not sure what else could satiate the desire to see him get his returned.

[-] Allonzee@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I mean, to be fair, his base probably came watching him do it.

He enjoys it and it reassures the Republican base he's their GodEmperorDaddu or whatever they're calling him this week. The out in the open, practiced, enthusiastic hatred is what made him their guy to begin with.

He had to hire extras to attend his rallies in 2016 until he opined about wishing Republicans could "beat the shit" out of their political enemies, that moment basically stole the entire Republican party out from under their establishment that was just about manipulating Republicans and their hatreds using dog whistles for corporate profit.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 month ago

i am 6 of one race, half dozen of another

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Talking Points Memo Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [High] (Click to view Full Report)

Name: Talking Points Memo Bias: Left
Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual
Country: United States of America
Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/talking-points-memo/

Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News


Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
Please consider supporting them by donating.

Footer

Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.

[-] quichequeen@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

I still don’t understand why he was speaking there in the first place. I read the press release that he would be there, as well as the statement by a Black author/presenter that because of his presence she would not be - it doesn’t sound like it was planned out much in advance. So does anyone know what NABJ’s purpose was with this interview? (I assume Trump’s was chaos and/or intimidation.)

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They've been routinely inviting Presidential candidates for quite a while. Here for example is the NABJ interview of Biden in 2020, and their interview of Clinton in 2016

The only real question is why Trump accepted.

[-] bluemite@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

He accepted because he's arrogant and ignorant

[-] Benchamoneh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago

But will it change anything?

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It means a bunch of people won't vote for Trump; he had been trying to peel off some of the Black vote. This means he can't

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago

The one Achilles heel of the campaigns push for black voters. The candidate doesn't like black people. But other than that, he's doing great.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2024
617 points (100.0% liked)

politics

18898 readers
2673 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS