192
submitted 11 months ago by girlfreddy@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world

Archive link

A California police department wants to be the first agency to have a law enforcement-branded Cybertruck, according to an internal email obtained by 404 Media.

The email Sergeant Jacob Gallacher, of the Anaheim Police Department, sent in early February read “P.S. I spoke with the Chief yesterday and we still want to be the first police agency to have a Cybertruck. If anyone can make that happen, I know it is you!” Gallacher sent the email to James Hedland from UP.FIT, a company that sells modified Teslas for use by law enforcement. The email was part of a conversation about the department’s use of Teslas.

Gallacher later told 404 Media that the email was something of “a joke,” but reaffirmed the agency’s wish to obtain a Cybertruck before other agencies, even if more for “community engagement” than using it as a patrol vehicle.

“We would, but it’s not necessarily from a patrol perspective,” Gallacher said. 404 Media obtained the email through a public records request.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 126 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Yes, we need the least functional, least capable, most failure prone, most brutalist vehicle possible. For community engagement.

EDIT: Also the most dangerous to both occupants and especially pedestrians.

[-] MehBlah@lemmy.world 35 points 11 months ago

Its just like the cars they drew when they were in grade school.

[-] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago

With the very crayons they ate

[-] BleatingZombie@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

You're talking as if they were ever able to graduate elementary school. The last time I saw police near an elementary school they were too scared to go in

[-] pivot_root@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

You're forgetting the most important part of the Cybertruck for those in the club: danger to pedestrians and non-Cybertruck civilians.

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 53 points 11 months ago

These the same kind of cops that vote solidly republican because they “hate government waste”?

[-] Aidinthel@reddthat.com 44 points 11 months ago

It's not hypocrisy when you understand that "waste" is conservative for "helps the poor and/or minorities"

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

Also they have no shame. And, don’t know what hypocrisy means.

[-] Bremmy@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago

"Devout Republicans"

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago

One man's garbage is another man's treasure.

[-] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 27 points 11 months ago

I've always thought these looked like they belong in a science-fiction b-movie. With the blue paint and police lights on top, they really look like they're from a RoboCop knock-off film.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

I keep saying it looks like a fiberglass shell over an El Camino in an 80s post-apocalyptic film.

Then I found out about the movie Battletruck.

I almost think Elon is a fan...

[-] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

Exactly! Don't forget about Megaweapon:

And Space Mutiny:

And apparently I'm five years late to the party:

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Megaweapon! Megaweapon! Megaweapon!

[-] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 22 points 11 months ago

The kind of person who actually wants a Cybertruck is definitely the kind of person who would be interesting in being a dickhead cop.

[-] HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.one 22 points 11 months ago

lol. We definitely need cop cars vulnerable to flipper zeros.

[-] FanciestPants@lemmy.world 22 points 11 months ago

Wouldn't criminals just wait to do crimes until it's raining?

[-] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 19 points 11 months ago

Part of being the police is advertising that there are police here, as a deterrent. This works well for that.

But another part is having fast, reliable vehicles able to out maneuver other cars on the road, to stop criminals after the fact. Not so good at that part.

[-] VanillaBean@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Eh chases aren’t that common. Most of the time police won’t pursue because it puts the public in more danger. Especially populated areas.

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

Idk about reliability, but electric cars can have crazy speed and acceleration.

[-] scoobford@lemmy.zip 3 points 11 months ago

Sort of. EVs are very fast off the line, but generally very heavy. It might be good for handing out speeding tickets on a freeway, but a pursuit on surface streets would probably not go as well.

It's also a fairly tall EV. I bet if you slid into a curb or something, it'll roll like Peppy Hare.

Assuming the thing worked as advertised and they get a VERY steep discount, it might be a good idea?

[-] Delusional@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago

It doesn't surprise me that cops want something that is ugly and tacky and completely unnecessary. And they'll use a shit ton of taxpayer money to get it too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago
[-] BestTestInTheWest@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

Dubai police already have a cybertruck in service.

[-] radivojevic@discuss.online 12 points 11 months ago

How do you get away from a cyber truck? Spray it with water

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Water balloons soon to be outlawed in California according to law enforcement source.

[-] radivojevic@discuss.online 2 points 11 months ago

Aren’t they already outlawed?

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

It's possible. Especially if they cause cancer.

[-] radivojevic@discuss.online 3 points 11 months ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Grass@sh.itjust.works 12 points 11 months ago

ngl I'd pour water on it.

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

I still think fondly on the time I saw a burning cop car during the BLM protests. That was a good day; Grateful for the promise of more to come.

[-] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 months ago

Yeah, but then the cops tracked that person down by what SHIRT they were wearing.

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

Amazing how good they are at solving crimes when they really apply themselves. Wouldn't it be wild if they did that for us?

[-] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

We aren't part of the owning class, police will never care about the working class in this system.

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 9 points 11 months ago

Imagine the fingers that will be lost in the trunk and the heads that will be smacked into the steel roof until it just looks like the top of the doors are painted red.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Allonzee@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Im all for this.

Easier to elude the ~~police~~ capital defense force when they drive an attention seeking shitbox.

[-] Marduk73@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 months ago

Lol figures this shit is from california.

[-] AncientFutureNow@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

dont advertise for elon, downvote

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

Being aware of what police departments are up to is not an advertisement for Elon.

Also, no one here is going to buy the ~~Homer Car~~ Cybertruck.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

I appreciate the sentiment of not promoting Elmo but yeah. Even if it wasn’t a dumpster fire, i doubt there’s a lot of potential buyers here.

load more comments (1 replies)
this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2024
192 points (100.0% liked)

News

30689 readers
3238 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS