192
submitted 2 years ago by girlfreddy@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world

Archive link

A California police department wants to be the first agency to have a law enforcement-branded Cybertruck, according to an internal email obtained by 404 Media.

The email Sergeant Jacob Gallacher, of the Anaheim Police Department, sent in early February read “P.S. I spoke with the Chief yesterday and we still want to be the first police agency to have a Cybertruck. If anyone can make that happen, I know it is you!” Gallacher sent the email to James Hedland from UP.FIT, a company that sells modified Teslas for use by law enforcement. The email was part of a conversation about the department’s use of Teslas.

Gallacher later told 404 Media that the email was something of “a joke,” but reaffirmed the agency’s wish to obtain a Cybertruck before other agencies, even if more for “community engagement” than using it as a patrol vehicle.

“We would, but it’s not necessarily from a patrol perspective,” Gallacher said. 404 Media obtained the email through a public records request.

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 126 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yes, we need the least functional, least capable, most failure prone, most brutalist vehicle possible. For community engagement.

EDIT: Also the most dangerous to both occupants and especially pedestrians.

[-] MehBlah@lemmy.world 35 points 2 years ago

Its just like the cars they drew when they were in grade school.

[-] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago

With the very crayons they ate

[-] BleatingZombie@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

You're talking as if they were ever able to graduate elementary school. The last time I saw police near an elementary school they were too scared to go in

[-] pivot_root@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

You're forgetting the most important part of the Cybertruck for those in the club: danger to pedestrians and non-Cybertruck civilians.

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 53 points 2 years ago

These the same kind of cops that vote solidly republican because they “hate government waste”?

[-] Aidinthel@reddthat.com 44 points 2 years ago

It's not hypocrisy when you understand that "waste" is conservative for "helps the poor and/or minorities"

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

Also they have no shame. And, don’t know what hypocrisy means.

[-] Bremmy@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

"Devout Republicans"

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago

One man's garbage is another man's treasure.

[-] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago

I've always thought these looked like they belong in a science-fiction b-movie. With the blue paint and police lights on top, they really look like they're from a RoboCop knock-off film.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

I keep saying it looks like a fiberglass shell over an El Camino in an 80s post-apocalyptic film.

Then I found out about the movie Battletruck.

I almost think Elon is a fan...

[-] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

Exactly! Don't forget about Megaweapon:

And Space Mutiny:

And apparently I'm five years late to the party:

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Megaweapon! Megaweapon! Megaweapon!

[-] FanciestPants@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago

Wouldn't criminals just wait to do crimes until it's raining?

[-] HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.one 22 points 2 years ago

lol. We definitely need cop cars vulnerable to flipper zeros.

[-] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago

The kind of person who actually wants a Cybertruck is definitely the kind of person who would be interesting in being a dickhead cop.

[-] Delusional@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago

It doesn't surprise me that cops want something that is ugly and tacky and completely unnecessary. And they'll use a shit ton of taxpayer money to get it too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 19 points 2 years ago

Part of being the police is advertising that there are police here, as a deterrent. This works well for that.

But another part is having fast, reliable vehicles able to out maneuver other cars on the road, to stop criminals after the fact. Not so good at that part.

[-] VanillaBean@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Eh chases aren’t that common. Most of the time police won’t pursue because it puts the public in more danger. Especially populated areas.

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago

Idk about reliability, but electric cars can have crazy speed and acceleration.

[-] scoobford@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 years ago

Sort of. EVs are very fast off the line, but generally very heavy. It might be good for handing out speeding tickets on a freeway, but a pursuit on surface streets would probably not go as well.

It's also a fairly tall EV. I bet if you slid into a curb or something, it'll roll like Peppy Hare.

Assuming the thing worked as advertised and they get a VERY steep discount, it might be a good idea?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago
[-] BestTestInTheWest@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

Dubai police already have a cybertruck in service.

[-] radivojevic@discuss.online 12 points 2 years ago

How do you get away from a cyber truck? Spray it with water

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Water balloons soon to be outlawed in California according to law enforcement source.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Grass@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 years ago

ngl I'd pour water on it.

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

I still think fondly on the time I saw a burning cop car during the BLM protests. That was a good day; Grateful for the promise of more to come.

[-] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 years ago

Yeah, but then the cops tracked that person down by what SHIRT they were wearing.

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Amazing how good they are at solving crimes when they really apply themselves. Wouldn't it be wild if they did that for us?

[-] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago

We aren't part of the owning class, police will never care about the working class in this system.

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 9 points 2 years ago

Imagine the fingers that will be lost in the trunk and the heads that will be smacked into the steel roof until it just looks like the top of the doors are painted red.

[-] SomeGuy69@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

When people lose random limbs, they can argue the person tried to resist the arrestment and got in between the moving parts. It totally wasn't on purpose.

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago

That is exactly my expectation. Put their hands on the trunk while they frisk them, "accidentally" hit the trunk close button, then either the person loses fingers or gets shot for resisting arrest when they move them out of the way.

[-] Allonzee@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Im all for this.

Easier to elude the ~~police~~ capital defense force when they drive an attention seeking shitbox.

[-] Marduk73@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago

Lol figures this shit is from california.

this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2024
192 points (100.0% liked)

News

38902 readers
2085 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS