[-] dev_null@lemmy.ml 13 points 14 hours ago

They know. But many people will look at the screw, see it's some weird thing they don't have a screwdriver for, and decide to take the car to an authorized dealership instead of trying to repair an issue themselves.

Some will just buy the special screwdriver. But that doesn't matter, what's important is that some won't, and the line goes up. You also have to look at it as yet another small barrier to repairability. It's not stopping you by itself, but every single barrier adds up and stops more people.

[-] dev_null@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago

Not really. That's their official English name. Same as when Czechia renamed itself from Czech Republic. Both aren't the name in the Czech language, but a country can still change their English name.

[-] dev_null@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 days ago

I did hear about his politics, it's years and years of progressive actions, donating to pro-LGBT and pro-women causes, and criticizing conservatives.

But he once said an anti-big tech FCC pick is a good thing which means he's MAGA.

[-] dev_null@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 days ago

Yeah what I need is an alternative to xprop and xwininfo.

[-] dev_null@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I would love for you to dispel the problem I wrote about: how to find the list of open windows (and whether they are focused or not), for time tracking. I don't believe kdotool can do that, from what I see.

[-] dev_null@lemmy.ml 59 points 1 year ago

I refuse to believe you are not certain this is a joke

[-] dev_null@lemmy.ml 130 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yeah, it is. It's such an extraordinary claim.

One requiring extraordinary evidence that wasn't provided.

"It's doing amazing hacks to access everything and it's so good at it it's undetectable!" Right, how convenient.

[-] dev_null@lemmy.ml 130 points 2 years ago

I'm sure Temu collects all information you put into the app and your behaviour in it, but this guy is making some very bold claims about things that just aren't possible unless Temu is packing some serious 0-days.

For example he says the app is collecting your fingerprint data. How would that even happen? Apps don't have access to fingerprint data, because the operating system just reports to the app "a valid fingerprint was scanned" or "an unknown fingerprint was scanned", and the actual fingerprint never goes anywhere. Is Temu doing an undetected root/jailbreak, then installing custom drivers for the fingerprint sensor to change how it works?

And this is just one claim. It's just full of bullshit. To do everything listed there it would have to do multiple major exploits that are on state-actor level and wouldn't be wasted on such trivial purpose. Because now that's it's "revealed", Google and Apple would patch them immediately.

But there is nothing to patch, because most of the claims here are just bullshit, with no technical proof whatsoever.

[-] dev_null@lemmy.ml 122 points 2 years ago

It lets you have analytics in your game (how many players do X, use y feature), without the backlash of analytics.

[-] dev_null@lemmy.ml 65 points 2 years ago

Of course it makes sense, the code does pretty much nothing. The point is that the tutorial does not teach you about how to remove a background. It's like a "how to cook X" article that just tells you to "order X online" and that's it.

[-] dev_null@lemmy.ml 59 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

anyone remember the time when google removed(!) their internal "don't be evil" rule?

I remember when media falsely reported clickbait articles that they did and people bring that up to this day. They moved it from the introduction to the closing statement. Which you can argue makes it less prominent or whatever, but it was never removed.

Of course it makes no difference, it wasn't followed either way, and definitely isn't followed now. But no, it was never removed. You can see it yourself right here at the end: https://abc.xyz/investor/google-code-of-conduct/

[-] dev_null@lemmy.ml 90 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The confusion stems from the fact there no APIs in Android that let apps use RCS. Only Google can use it on Android and no other apps can use it. Anyone can make an SMS app. Only Google can make an RCS app.

It is an open standard, meaning you are free to create your own operating system for phones that implements RCS. But Google doesn't let you use it on Android, so in practice it's closed.

Plus, Google's implementation of RCS adds extra features (like encryption) that aren't part of the standard. So even if you create your own operating system that implements RCS, it will still be incompatible. So that's another reason it's not really open.

view more: next ›

dev_null

joined 2 years ago