I zoomed all the way in and I don't see anything wrong with the text. I even drew horizontal lines on a screenshot to confirm they do in fact sit on the same baselines correctly.
You are claiming breaking bad made up that old school biker meth bit?
The blue color part of it, yes.
Because their other stuff is all real.
Yeah, not sure how that connects to the blue color, what do you mean?
Maybe you just are not familiar with the chemistry in that old school formulation where the ingredient became controlled so it was no longer used?
I sure aren't, I'm just repeating what the showrunners said, the show creators said they made it up as a plot device.
I know, what I'm saying is that explanation is fictional. It wouldn't be blue anyway in real life. The ingredient they used wasn't claimed to be dyed, the show just invented fictional chemistry that makes it blue.
There is definitely more multi-episode storylines and progression as the show goes on, but the problem remains that most of the time they can't really keep amazing tech they find, because it would solve too many problems or make things boring.
It does occasionally happen though. Over the seasons they do accrue an impressive collection of tech which does carry over and is used in episodes going forward.
Are drug dealers actually colouring meth blue to cash in on the popularity of Breaking Bad? As far as I know the show just made it up and real meth is never blue.
He wants to take over 50% of the companies without paying them. If that's not seizing then I don't know what is.
Edit: If the downvoters want to tell me where I'm wrong, I'd be glad to be corrected.
I just photoshopped my fake name onto a picture of an ID and they accepted it as proof.
I don't think "correctly label FAT32 as FAT32 instead of a versionless FAT" is "lowering ourselves down". In fact I'd say it's the opposite, let's be technically precise and correct, instead of a simplified label that confuses everyone.
And on the other issue, what do you have against file managers being able to mount a network drive? Yeah I can do it in fstab but if I could do it faster right from the file manager I would.
Why is making things better a problem? If Gnome add the mounting feature to their file manager in the future, you will be against it, talking about the good old days where real men edited fstab uphill both ways? Whom does that help?
Taking back half of their stolen profits seems like a step in the good direction though. Let's seize their assets, starting with the half here, and then close them down.
You can, but 90% 3D printer buyers can't, and that's a good enough amount of people to spy on.
A fellow passenger “saw the man at the front of the plane near the cockpit, in their words, kind of reach for a flight attendant and subsequently had multiple guys hold him back,” Rundle said.
So the guy wanted to get the flight attendants attention, and instead he got arrested and the plane diverted? I have to note the "multiple attempts to breach the cockpit" are nowhere in the actual article.
So you do agree it's seizing, which is all I said. I didn't say anything about it being a realistic proposal.