834
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 131 points 3 months ago

I gotta admit though that it's a pretty awesome coincidence that the moon is the size and at a distance that makes it look approximately the same size as the sun and allows us to have amazing looking eclipses.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 39 points 3 months ago

But the moon is slowly drifting away from the Earth so it will not be true in the relatively near future.

[-] NeptuneOrbit@lemmy.world 65 points 3 months ago
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 40 points 3 months ago

Okay, not as near as I thought, although I did mean "relatively" compared to the age of the Earth.

[-] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

Or, you know, me admitting I was wrong but still clarifying.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 months ago

They said "relatively". So it's okay.

[-] NeptuneOrbit@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

I don't know if this is sarcastic, but pedantic and edifying are a venn diagram

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ladicius@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

And the sun is expanding, too.

May take a while but if you look closely you will notice. Just wait.

[-] Rekonok@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 months ago

I was concerned about my eyes so I asked google before.

Gemini said it is ok to stare at it

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 10 points 3 months ago

I followed it's instructions and glued my eyes open!

[-] joneskind@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago

How many centuries of science progress do you think we lost with this “awesome coincidence”?

A bigger or smaller moon in the sky would have probably made the mechanism of the solar system a little more obvious for sure.

[-] jpeps@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

I'm guessing basically 0 years, honestly. Both are visible in the sky at the same time, so I'm not really sure what being different sizes would clarify.

[-] joneskind@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

I think too much order lead to a loss of information.

Of course they are visible at the time so we know they are not the same. But the way we Humans generalize concepts around ridiculously little set of data makes me think that most of people must have looked at the sky, decided they were the same type of things that have definitely always been there, and just forget about it. “Nah we good, those are Gods. Don’t think about it and don’t make them angry”.

This is the type of coincidence that is blinding in a way. People naturally give way too much attention to random things. There are literally tons of textbooks examples of events that look totally improbable, but will in fact appear constantly (meeting someone who knows someone you know in an airplane, meeting someone with the same birthday at a wedding etc).

[-] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

we have gained from this awesome coincidence. A solar eclipse was used to prove einstein's theories the first time. This coincidence was exactly what they needed to observe the stars which appear very close to the sun, without the sun's light washing them out, and measure how much their light was bent by the sun's mass. Too big or too small and it would have taken much longer to prove.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] uriel238 5 points 3 months ago

Only for this specific eclipse. Sometimes the moon is closer, so it completely shrouds the sun and we get to see the ghosty heliosphere of illuminated gasses. Other timed the sun is smaller and we get a ring of fire. Curiously sometimes Mercury gets in the way, but it's so far away, and so close to the sun it appears as a tiny black dot.

But the earth (and most of the solar system) is so tiny it barely exists. Jupiter retains a tiny bit of mass, to the sun, we are microbial. We humans are fleas on fleas.

[-] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 65 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Pretty sure the sun is way more than seven times brighter than the moon

Edit: after a quick internet search, the sun looks to be about 400,000 times brighter than the moon

[-] Klear@lemmy.world 66 points 3 months ago

That might be, but the moon is more important, since it shines at night when it's dark. The sun is only in the sky during the day, when there's plenty of light anyway.

[-] Kase@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

during the day, when there's plenty of light anyway

b- because of the sun, no? or is that the joke i'm missing lol

[-] lemmy_get_my_coat@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

Yep, that's a whoosh my friend

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 36 points 3 months ago

Technically, TECHNICALLY, the Sun is infinitely brighter than the Moon since it emits no light at all ☝️

[-] thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world 30 points 3 months ago

eh, as a videographer who measures and labels the output of lights professionally sometimes, we count bounced lights as lights.

[-] JudahBenHur@lemm.ee 23 points 3 months ago

thank god a videographer chimed in

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

Someone uttered for the first time ever

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

The moon has an albedo of roughly 6% and is so small compared to the sun. So yep 400,000 times checks out

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 29 points 3 months ago

It’s not the burgers fault. That’s just a really small car.

[-] hsdkfr734r@feddit.nl 11 points 3 months ago

I would say, this one is normal sized. It's the other cars which... aren't.

But this is a tiny burger for sure.

[-] GTKashi@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Well I think the car is half full!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] thefrankring@lemmy.world 28 points 3 months ago

The burger is bigger than the moon and the sun.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 28 points 3 months ago

I mean, it's possible if the burger is American. Unless the car is also American.

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 22 points 3 months ago

They could actually be one in the same:

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 18 points 3 months ago

and its taste is sevenfold tastier

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

I would say that a burger is at least sevenfold tastier than a car.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] bolexforsoup 15 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)
[-] snooggums@midwest.social 6 points 3 months ago

Somebody slap an ifunny.com metadata on it!

[-] Obi@sopuli.xyz 5 points 3 months ago

Anyway, if that was really shot on a 25mm, then it's cropped massively, rendering the metric useless anyway.

[-] MehBlah@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

I forget some people went to the Rocket The Raccoon school of perception.

[-] Norgur@fedia.io 8 points 3 months ago
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

"Come on, Ted. Sure it's no more peculiar than all that stuff we learned in the seminary, you know, Heaven and Hell and everlasting life and all that type of thing. You're not meant to take it seriously, Ted!"

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] lauha@lemmy.one 7 points 3 months ago

I agree with who made the meme. Their angular size is the same.

[-] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago
[-] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

That's a bun. If it was a burger, you're doing burgers wrong. 😊

[-] ryan213@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago

Lol another "wtf" from the bible.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Not exactly, book of Enoch is not part of the Bible, it's an Ethiopian thing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Enoch

None of the three books are considered to be canonical scripture by the majority of Jewish or Christian church bodies.

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

So you are saying the inerrant eternal word of God is determined by current popular opinion?

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Nah that nonsense is no worse than the nonsense actually in the Bible, but technically we can't call Christians out on something that isn't considered canonical by Christians IMO.

But that wasn't the point I was trying to make, I merely corrected someone from the false belief that it was actually from the Bible.

It is still usable as something people would gladly accept as being from the Bible, because the Bible is full of factually false claims too. It shows that nothing is too stupid to be in the Bible.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

There are lots of non-Ethiopian Christians who don't really know anything about the Bible and accept quotes from the Book of Enoch as if it were part of the mainstream Christian canon. Keep the faithful ignorant and that's what you get.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 25 May 2024
834 points (100.0% liked)

Atheist Memes

5455 readers
5 users here now

About

A community for the most based memes from atheists, agnostics, antitheists, and skeptics.

Rules

  1. No Pro-Religious or Anti-Atheist Content.

  2. No Unrelated Content. All posts must be memes related to the topic of atheism and/or religion.

  3. No bigotry.

  4. Attack ideas not people.

  5. Spammers and trolls will be instantly banned no exceptions.

  6. No False Reporting

  7. NSFW posts must be marked as such.

Resources

International Suicide Hotlines

Recovering From Religion

Happy Whole Way

Non Religious Organizations

Freedom From Religion Foundation

Atheist Republic

Atheists for Liberty

American Atheists

Ex-theist Communities

!exchristian@lemmy.one

!exmormon@lemmy.world

!exmuslim@lemmy.world

Other Similar Communities

!religiouscringe@midwest.social

!priest_arrested@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.ml

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS