837
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 64 points 7 months ago

Reductive. Neoliberalism protects and foments fascism as we ratchet a little further to the right each election cycle.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 47 points 7 months ago

Even if we assume for the sake of the argument that your ridiculous assertion is true, "Let's do fascism faster" is exactly the kind of bootlicking take I would expect from a tankie.

[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 37 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Never said I was a tankie bruh. A party that bases itself on a slightly more gentle fascism isn't the cart we should be attaching ourselves to.

It will never ever be the right election for y'all liberal centrists who shit post on left folks. It is always the next one. Point is, if we want to be rid of this fucking fascist shit, we have to build solidarity with the left.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 30 points 7 months ago

Never said I was a tankie bruh.

Didn't realize that I wasn't allowed to point out tankie behavior like "Faster fascism Good, Actually" unless the poster self-identified, thank you for the information.

[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 28 points 7 months ago

Thank you for your inability to listen to reason.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 25 points 7 months ago

"Reason" here being "Make fascism happen faster"

Forgive me for not finding that a terribly compelling argument.

[-] BossDj@lemm.ee 28 points 7 months ago

Idealism is fun, but it's so very extremely privileged.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 30 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Idealism is great when you use it to fight for a better world.

Idealism is privileged when you use it to deny any reduction in harm as not being 'good enough' to permit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 19 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

What is ideal about 40 years of two-party neoliberal movement to the right bringing us to the brink of fascism?

What is privileged about not having healthcare security, job security, in endless war, the environment going to pot, rent exploding, deregulation, ballooning prison numbers, speculative housing markets? Honestly it feels like the privileged who cannot imagine anything different than the bipartisan system that pits us (those on the left and liberals) against each other.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago

Idealism is fun, but it’s so very extremely privileged.

What is ideal about 40 years of two party neoliberal movement to the right bringing us to the brink of fascism?

Jesus. At least work on your reading comprehension before responding.

[-] Sasha 21 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Not interested in the whole yelling at each other thing, so genuinely asking here. What exactly does not voting democrat get the left in the US? Is the OP's assumption that you want to accelerate fascism actually correct?

So far I haven't seen any reason other than either accelerationism or "because it makes me feel bad" and I refuse to believe that's all that's behind it.

I'm really having a hard time, and I genuinely think it's important to try to understand the points of view and beliefs of those we disagree with, rather than immediately turning to infighting.

[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago
[-] Sasha 14 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I can't tell if you're mocking me, I don't know how much clearer I can be that I just want to know why, if I can't understand why people think it's a good idea then I can't be sure that my views/opinions are actually worth anything.

If you just don't want to talk to me then, that's okay too.

[-] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 11 points 7 months ago

People like this exist to argue. They have no ideology and no beliefs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Is this a bot? This reply doesn't make any sense.

What are you agreeing with? They asked you for more information.

[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

I was agreeing with not shitting on the left and the need for an attempt to understand them. Not a lot of good faith attempts at understanding happening here, just a lot of bullying.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

Political parties exist in the free market just like corporations. If they can't earn votes a new party will form. It's happened before and it will happen again. That's why they message with fear. It's effective at turning off any critical thinking.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago
[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

It's okay, when we're dragged off to the camps for being Democrats, minorities, and 'useless eaters', the tankies will assure us that Biden would have done the same, in 6-10 decades.

[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago

Conflating anyone on the left with being tankies is exactly the problem.

[-] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago

If you don't like being called a tankie, then don't push tankie talking points, champ.

[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

Go and read some, the left is a spectrum. Fuck tankies.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

Oh, okay, so accelerationism and anti-democratic sentiment is just normal leftism nowadays? We're all MLs and MLMs? Cool cool cool.

[-] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Oh, of course. Remember, it's evil to vote for democrats so the best thing to do is not vote at all! /s. Tankie logic.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

Don't worry, online brigading is definitely good praxis though, unlike so-called 'harm reduction' which only extends the period in which minorities can fight for a better future. Don't they know that that's useless, and what they REALLY should be doing is dying to inspire the privileged to finally Rise Up(tm) on their (belated) behalf?

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

He just calls anyone to the left of him a tankie. He has no clue what it actually means.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee 32 points 7 months ago

The reason why the rachet turns further to the right each election cycle is because non-conservatives in the US have an abysmal voter turnout.

Neoliberalism is the product of leftists deciding not to vote because there's no "good" option, and leftists will perpetuate this cycle by refusing to acknowledge incremental progress as a good thing.

[-] hark@lemmy.world 26 points 7 months ago

If only there was a way to increase voter turnout, like giving voters what they want... nah, that'd make too much sense. The democrats are too smart to give people what they want.

[-] Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee 15 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Democrats do that. They appeal to centrists because those are the people who turn out to vote.

Leftists don't get representation, the ratchet turns right. Funny how that works

[-] hark@lemmy.world 18 points 7 months ago

Or maybe the centrists turn out because they're the ones that democrats appeal to. Obama ran on a progressive campaign and won big in 2008, so it's clear that it works. The problem is that he then immediately turned around and instituted centrist policy as usual.

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

Neoliberalism exists for many reasons. But blaming leftists is strange. We would be a lot better off if voting was not so hard for black and brown people, for instance. We can at least agree on that.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 10 points 7 months ago

No one will vote for our shitty candidates.

Should we run better ones?

No blame the people for us not having a good candidate

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] GladiusB@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago

Use normal words. You are trying intimidate people with confidence and you just end up not making any sort of point. If we vote the right people in and the right people do their job it isn't fascist. We aren't in a fascist regime. You are the only one being "reductive".

[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Those are normal words, I apologize for not being the right kind of articulate for you. we have been moving right for 40 plus years. Both parties have been complicit. We fight endless wars under both parties. We have lost access to inexpensive higher education under both parties. We have lost the battle to the healthcare industry under both parties. We have seen the rise of the military police state under both parties. We have become spied on in every facet of life under both parties. Our public infrastructure is falling apart and being deregulated under both parties. We have seen the militarization of our borders under both parties.

These are real material problems that we continue to ignore with the focus on these two parties. We've seen a modicum of progress in certain areas, but there has been a lot of loss of freedom and liberty.

[-] GladiusB@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

I disagree. Neoliberalism and foments are not common at all. You can even look it up statistically if you would like. We are not a fascist regime just because you don't like every decision. That isn't how fascism works. You still have many freedoms others do not. Is it expensive? Absolutely. Is it fair? No. But there are plenty of Democrats fighting the dumbasses for those rights to become easier. So chill on your "we are in a fascist regime" jargon just because you can't get every single little thing you want.

[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

I said we are moving towards fascism. I never said "we are in a fascist regime".

[-] GladiusB@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I don't know if we can discuss how using more words attuned with the audience would help? I think I already said that and you didn't take kindly to it.

Foment as much as it could be a synonym for instigate or moving towards as you put it, could also be taken as inspires or motivates an already mobilized force. Maybe it was a poor choice for what you were trying to convey.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
this post was submitted on 18 May 2024
837 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

5653 readers
1109 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS