832
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] hark@lemmy.world 26 points 4 months ago

If only there was a way to increase voter turnout, like giving voters what they want... nah, that'd make too much sense. The democrats are too smart to give people what they want.

[-] Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee 15 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Democrats do that. They appeal to centrists because those are the people who turn out to vote.

Leftists don't get representation, the ratchet turns right. Funny how that works

[-] hark@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago

Or maybe the centrists turn out because they're the ones that democrats appeal to. Obama ran on a progressive campaign and won big in 2008, so it's clear that it works. The problem is that he then immediately turned around and instituted centrist policy as usual.

[-] Shyfer@ttrpg.network 5 points 4 months ago

Same thing with Biden. Ran on $10,000 of student debt relief for everyone, improving the climate, and not being Trump. People figured they could push him left, that was the argument. Now he's been a lot better than I thought he would be admittedly. But still, the student debt relief has been extremely targeted, he made foreign electric cars more expensive, and he's materially supporting a genocide while yelling at the protests against it. If they can't push him left in 4 years, then the theory was proven wrong, candidates can't be pushed left, and it's right for leftists not to vote for them. Democrats don't feel they have to move left because leftists have no other choice about who to vote for, so I get the calculus on their parts, but it's becoming dangerous.

It also depends on how much supporting a current genocide is a red line for someone. That seems to be the biggest difference I see in these posts. Some people can't bring themselves to vote for someone who does that no matter what. Others seem to be more malleable and forgiving about it. I know which one I am, but honestly, no judgment on either. I waffle between them myself. I don't feel nearly as much pressure as others,though, because I don't live in a swing state, so my vote doesn't matter.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Obama ran on a progressive campaign and won big in 2008, so it’s clear that it works

God. It's fascinating how little self-proclaimed leftists remember 2008.

[-] hark@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

Which part am I wrong about? Obama ran on affordable healthcare, abortion rights, being anti-bailout for too-big-to-fail entities, and being anti-war. He won a supermajority. Then he scaled back his healthcare plan, said abortion rights "aren't a top priority", continued bush's bailouts and added more, and invaded/bombed more countries during his term.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Obama passed the best affordable healthcare plan he could.

On abortion rights, he was no more left than Hillary. On the bailouts, he was openly in support of the Bush bailout plan even before the election. On war, Obama was openly in favor of the continuation of the war in Afghanistan and harder military policy against several countries, some of which even McCain wasn't onboard on.

But hey, whatever helps fuel your delusional "If only candidates were more left, then they would DEFINITELY win in a landslide!" outlook.

[-] mydude@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

The democrats are all moderate republicans, which in itself is an oxymoron. Don't believe me, here is Obama saying just that (about himself); https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJIlZxHfclc Now imagine you somehow get total control of all braches, and to top it off 3 weeks filibuster proof. You can do anything, but you don't really want change. What do you do? Well implement RomneyCare, call it ObamaCare and leave out the public option, which will ensure it be a giveaway to big pharma. Seems good at first glance, but leaving out the public option really killed it, as they intended.

Regarding roe...

The first thing I'll do as President is sign the Freedom of Choice Act https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=BdrOrwmk78Y

Im pro choice https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmzdkAbu8dY

Not my highest priority https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RxiDZejZFjg

parody... No https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1z4uhxpOnN0

[-] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 8 points 4 months ago

Obama had full control of both houses and the White House, they could have passed whatever they wanted.

Instead we still didn’t get single payer healthcare.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Obama had full control of both houses and the White House, they could have passed whatever they wanted.

Fucking lmao.

[-] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 5 points 4 months ago

Oh I’m sorry, where did the ACA come from?

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Three months of Obama's negotiations with a Senate whose supermajority was built on Blue-Dog Democrats from highly conservative areas, and of whom every single one was necessary.

What, do you think Obama comes in like a Roman Emperor, proposes legislation to the Senate, and then has a vote that same day? Do you not know anything about the functioning of the modern US Congress? Jesus Christ.

[-] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 7 points 4 months ago

If Obama couldn’t get his team to fall in line when they had everything going for them, then he did not do his job well enough.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

"His team"

The Senate wasn't hand-picked by Obama. Fuck, many of them had been in the Senate longer than Obama had been in politics, repeatedly re-elected by their constituents to represent interests which were not necessarily in-line with Obama's plans. "He should have just done it better!" is a ridiculous position.

[-] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 6 points 4 months ago

His team is the Democratic Party, by his own choice

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

His team is the Democratic Party because there are two major parties in this country. And one of them spent years calling him racial slurs, so their support was doubtful.

What were Obama's other choices, in this scenario?

We fight according to the situation as it is, not the situation as we want it to be.

[-] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 4 points 4 months ago
[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

An incredibly popular president returning after having already been elected once split off during a contested convention at the Republican Party, which was initially the venue through which their candidate was going to run and managed to lose the ensuing election, accomplishing nothing except the election of a rival.

And that was the best third-party showing in US presidential history.

[-] shikitohno@lemm.ee 5 points 4 months ago

Obama was really good at letting people project what they wanted on to him politically, while still broadly holding to the neoliberal agenda, and lots of people were insanely naïve at the time. I mean, you had people who claimed to actually expect the election of Obama to usher in a post-racial epoch in the USA, as though all the racists were going to say, "Aw, shucks, the black guy won? Well, hang it up boys, we have to face reality and accept we've been wrong all along."

He also benefitted from pretty excellent political cover from criticism, where, like many vocal Biden supporters are doing right now, any criticism of him would be associated with outright support of the vilest opinions espoused by the GOP at the time. If you said "You know, this Obama guy isn't as great as he's being made out to be," you'd have people assuming you were some nutjob that thought he was secretly Kenyan, or whatever other crazy conspiracies the Tea Party folks trotted out. I don't think it was purely malicious or cynical attempts to discredit people all the time, but there was a big chunk of people who wanted to believe in their conception of Obama, which couldn't admit that he wasn't the savior sent from on high to resolve all the country's problems in exactly the manner they had hoped he would.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Good god. You win elections from the center. A center vote that switches from R to D is worth double because the R loses one vote and D gains one. You literally win from the center.

If you want the center to move, then make the Dems win overwhelmingly and consistently in President, house of reps, and senators.

[-] hark@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

So do you think republicans are catering to centrists with their full dive into fascism or do you think only democrats need to appeal to "centrists" for some reason?

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Trump won by appealing to the manufacturing jobs sector, and because of the protest Hillary vote. As much as I want to believe people were/are informed about his fascism, they really aren't.

And now, because Trump won one election, the whole Overton window moved right. You know, because he won an election. You want to move the Overton window? Vote.

[-] Shyfer@ttrpg.network 2 points 4 months ago

Biden won an election more recently than him. Weird how the Overton window moves when Republicans win an election but not when Democrats do. Wonder if there's a reason for that.

Hell, Bernie (and Warren) moved the widow more by running in a primary than they did by winning.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

The reason is because Dems have to actually do things like pass legislation. Which more often than not requires all 3 of house, senate, and president. All the GOP has to do is block things and yell immigrants. Progress takes, you know, actual work. Stagnation or regression takes next to nothing.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

like giving voters what they want

Funny enough, giving voters what they want is inevitably decried by Very Serious Online Leftists

this post was submitted on 18 May 2024
832 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

5234 readers
2339 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS