261
submitted 2 years ago by NightOwl@lemmy.ca to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

Archive: [ https://archive.is/z7xcs ]

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 30 points 2 years ago

Not a single paragraph about the actual demands of Russia. Which they have stated often enough. Basically they don't want NATO right on their doorstep. This is what this whole war was about. But somehow this is never seriously discussed in western media.

[-] Skua@kbin.social 70 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

If this war was about having NATO on their doorstep, why is it an invasion of a non-NATO country twenty years after the first neighbours of Russia joined NATO? It's never seriously discussed because it's either a lie or unfathomably stupid, and whichever of those two it is doesn't much matter.

Just for a second, imagine you're a neutral country in eastern Europe. Russia has been fucking with Georgia and Moldova since the fall of the Soviet Union, and now it invades Ukraine for the second time within a decade. Russia has never touched a NATO country despite bordering several of them for literally decades. And then Russia acts all shocked when you say you want into NATO

[-] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 19 points 2 years ago

Yeah and Russia protested strongly every time. But Ukraine was their red line. Just because you didn't read it in western media doesn't mean it didn't happen.

I don't condone the invasion but it was predictable and a colossal "failure" of diplomacy if you look at it charitably. At worst it was a long term plan to force Russia into a conflict with the aid of western media to obscure the reason why this war was happening. Russia is acting just like the US would.

[-] Skua@kbin.social 37 points 2 years ago

So invading Ukraine fixes what for Russia, exactly? The fastest way to make more of Russia's neighbours join NATO is to show them that they're safer in NATO. Like Finland.

Ukrainians mostly weren't interested in joining NATO until Russia took Crimea. Russia pushed Ukraine towards NATO.

[-] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 17 points 2 years ago

"Ukraine applied to integrate with a NATO Membership Action Plan (MAP) in 2008. Plans for NATO membership were shelved by Ukraine following the 2010 presidential election in which Viktor Yanukovych". Then the Euromaiden protests happened. Then Crimea etc.

It's pretty safe to assume that both Russia and the US meddled in the respective election through NGOs and whatnot. My point is that these are geopolitical games which both sides play and which should be reported as such. Then we'd have a chance to protest for peace negotiations. But as is there is an overwhelming amount of pro-war sentiment.

[-] Skua@kbin.social 27 points 2 years ago

Public support for joining NATO among polled Ukrainians was very clearly the minority up until Russia invaded.

But as is there is an overwhelming amount of pro-war sentiment.

There's an overwhelming amount of anti-invasion sentiment. People that support arming Ukraine support Ukraine's right to not have chunks carved out of it just because its neighbour has a bigger army.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

What are you talking about? There were no concrete plans for Ukraine to enter NATO prior to the invasion in 2014.

[-] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago

See first paragraph. Russia has protested NATO eastward expansion and warned for decades.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rdri@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

plan to force Russia into a conflict

Please explain how exactly do you force someone (who suggests to be reasonable) into conflict, basically force them to invade anyone.

Did the Poland "forced" Hitler to start the WW2 the same way?

[-] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Please explain how exactly do you force someone (who suggests to be reasonable) into conflict, basically force them to invade anyone.

Well imagine if China were to make a military pact with Mexico and started delivering "defensive" weapon systems to them. There would be protests, sanctions, meddling and attempts for regime change, and if those didn't work there would be invasion.

For the US to invade another country it actually takes far less. Getting bombed is super easy.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] trebuchet@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 years ago

It's hardly unprecedented. The USA felt forced into an aggressive response to the Soviets putting missiles in Cuba during the Cuban Missile Crisis.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 30 points 2 years ago

Then turning Ukraine into Russian territory is a bit counter productive no? That would literally bring NATO to Russias doorstep.

[-] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

They want a buffer zone. Makes sense in terms of military strategy.

[-] FatLegTed@feddit.uk 28 points 2 years ago

But NATO already is on their doorstep. Norway, Estonia, Poland etc. Even USA is only a few mils away across the Bering Strait.

This is not about Ukraine joining NATO, that's a convenience.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

That's just such galaxy brain logic there. We've already built up a threat on your doorstep, so you shouldn't worry about us expanding that threat further. 🤡

Furthermore, Stoltenberg has now publicly admitted that this is in fact about Ukraine joining NATO

The opposite happened. He wanted us to sign that promise, never to enlarge NATO. He wanted us to remove our military infrastructure in all Allies that have joined NATO since 1997, meaning half of NATO, all the Central and Eastern Europe, we should remove NATO from that part of our Alliance, introducing some kind of B, or second class membership. We rejected that.

You gotta update your script now.

[-] randy@lemmy.ca 26 points 2 years ago

Basically they don’t want NATO right on their doorstep.

NATO is not the anti-Russia club. They're a defensive pact. Why would you be concerned about your neighbours agreeing to defend each other? Like a neighbourhood watch, perhaps. Maybe you'd be upset if you're planning to do the thing they're defending against. Which is all the more reason for those neighbours to band together.

[-] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 17 points 2 years ago

NATO was founded pretty much explicitly as the anti-USSR club. And it doesn't even matter what it factually is - it's what Russia perceives it as. See their final ultimatum: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_Putin's_December_2021_ultimatum

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 years ago

Wait until you hear what that defensive pact did in Yugoslavia and Libya

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] rdri@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I think you're missing a paragraph that tells how the border between Russia and NATO increased twofold since (and as the result of) the invasion.

"Hey it's all about NATO. We always wanted less NATO at our doorsteps, and you can see we tried our best to achieve this. That backfired, yes, but we ask you once again to... Ask all those countries nicely to withdraw from NATO. Having NATO at our borders is not healthy for our people, you see... With all those bio laboratories... And parent№1+parent№2 policy that you force on everyone..."

[-] LittleBorat2@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 years ago

I don't want people like you in my comments but no one acknowledges that. So weird.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 years ago

I don’t want people like you in my comments but no one acknowledges that. So weird.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 months ago)
[-] Skua@kbin.social 21 points 2 years ago

No, demanding your neighbours all remain weak enough for you to continue bullying is not perfectly reasonable at all

[-] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 years ago

My friend it was never about NATO. There is no prospective out there based in fact where NATO has anything to do with it.

[-] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago

Russia said since 2014 this was about NATO. Even before they protested strongly the NATO expansion. So how can it not be about NATO? You're either completely uninformed or lying.

[-] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 years ago

You have the media literacy of a fly. Not even Russia supporters believe this is about NATO.

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Uh… yes, we do? I mean not only about NATO, but definitely also about NATO. Even liberals like Jeffrey Sachs and radlibs like Noam Chomsky and undead ghouls like Henry Kissinger agree.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] trebuchet@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The British news outlet The Guardian: "Many predicted Nato expansion would lead to war. Those warnings were ignored."

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/feb/28/nato-expansion-war-russia-ukraine

[-] Skua@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago

By "the Guardian" here what you mean is "an opinion piece from the fucking Cato Institute"

It was an excellent question, and neither the Clinton administration nor its successors provided even a remotely convincing answer.

The answers are South Ossetia, Abkhazia, and Transnistria

[-] Z3k3@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

While that may or may not be the case this does not permit interference of sovereign state from acting in its own best in own best interest.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sxan@midwest.social 9 points 2 years ago

Too fucking bad.

I don't want you to be on the internet, but that's not a decision I get to make, just like Russia doesn't gets to decide what its sovereign neighbors do. Because they're not Russia's, and don't have to do what Russia says.

If might makes right, then NATO has the right to absolutely roll over Russia and make it their bitch. But that's not how international law works, and everyone except Russia is still trying to play nice, as much as they can.

[-] CultHero@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

This whole shit storm has been about one thing. Putins legacy as the czar that reformed the USSR. That's it. He wants to lift the iron curtain high once more. It's all dick stroking by a madman.

[-] Holyginz@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Because they don't get the option to choose. It's not that difficult. Those countries weren't clamoring to join NATO until Russia invaded, so its their own fault.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Basically they don’t want NATO right on their doorstep.

Have you looked at a map of Europe lately?

load more comments (4 replies)
this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2024
261 points (100.0% liked)

World News

37166 readers
172 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS