261
submitted 7 months ago by NightOwl@lemmy.ca to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

Archive: [ https://archive.is/z7xcs ]

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 11 points 7 months ago

My friend it was never about NATO. There is no prospective out there based in fact where NATO has anything to do with it.

[-] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 10 points 7 months ago

Russia said since 2014 this was about NATO. Even before they protested strongly the NATO expansion. So how can it not be about NATO? You're either completely uninformed or lying.

[-] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 11 points 7 months ago

You have the media literacy of a fly. Not even Russia supporters believe this is about NATO.

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Uh… yes, we do? I mean not only about NATO, but definitely also about NATO. Even liberals like Jeffrey Sachs and radlibs like Noam Chomsky and undead ghouls like Henry Kissinger agree.

[-] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

It's an element but anyone saying the war was started because of NATO is clearly bullshitting. Now if you were to ask why the war is still going on despite both sides wanting peace, NATO is a pretty succinct and accurate explanation.

[-] Vilian@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 months ago

don't waste word with trolls, he always answer these kinds of posts with russia propaganda

[-] mashbooq@infosec.pub 6 points 7 months ago

and US fascists say banning trans people is about protecting children. only a fool believes the narrative of a fascist

[-] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 8 points 7 months ago

Well if you insist on not taking Russia seriously - then you must be very pleased with the result. Maybe you should call Putin a Hitler a few more times, that will solve everything :D

[-] trebuchet@lemmy.ml 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The British news outlet The Guardian: "Many predicted Nato expansion would lead to war. Those warnings were ignored."

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/feb/28/nato-expansion-war-russia-ukraine

[-] Skua@kbin.social 8 points 7 months ago

By "the Guardian" here what you mean is "an opinion piece from the fucking Cato Institute"

It was an excellent question, and neither the Clinton administration nor its successors provided even a remotely convincing answer.

The answers are South Ossetia, Abkhazia, and Transnistria

this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2024
261 points (100.0% liked)

World News

32091 readers
587 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS