if you get hit by a wall with infinite weight, moving at 1km/h, it has infinite energy, yet it will merely push you away
i do have to point out, the plane trip itself was far worse, climate wise, than the vibe writing.
That said, yes I agree, it is of course an extra load, that could be easily avoided.
You have it backwards. Larger vehicles of course have more energy, but pedestrians are too light for that to make a difference.
If you get hit by an oil tanker ship going ~1 kmh, that ship has orders of magnitude more kinetic energy than a car at highway speed, yet, unless theres a wall or something, the ship will merely push you harmlessly aside.
Its about the manner of delivery, not the vehicles energy.
Larger cars are more dangerous because they hit you higher up, where you have more vital organs.
I agree, large cars are generally much more lethal to pedestrians, due to their shape, not kinetic energy.
Thats not how kinetic energy works, no pedestrian is heavy enough to stop any car, small or large.
at that point youre just challenging your stomach for no reason
eh, you know what, fair enough!
way to shift blame
february 2026
mo tu we th fr sa su
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28
11: It's the only browser on the market that is not either apple webkit or google chrome based. And it's in our best interest to keep said market healthy, with as many competing actors as possible.
This is not a zero sum game. there's no competition. We can deal with both problems, we don't have to pick a side.
It's technically infinite, but the set of numbers we can express (in a reasonable timeframe), while large, is finite.