Narrator - "it wasnt"

It's actually an instance of super small government. Those regulations are dictated by city's and counties not by states

This man exploded 3 seconds later, those are gas lines

Yeah, also Samsung made it work in the S active phones, and Nokia has started carrying the torch with their XR line. That's Def not the reason for them being removed.

I was gunna comment that this man might have strayed a bit far from his main quest line, but he signed off on that post as "Center Star" so I think it's safe to say he's right on track.

This chaps my ass almost as much as the beefy 5 layer burrito

That price held untill atleast 2012, that's a solid 5 dollars of increase in just over 10 years. I could totally be talking out my ass

Chin cramp gang rise up. U remain the unicorn of the armpit cramp, that sounds agonizing, sorry for ur loss.

It's honestly more of a clearence issue, but either way it is most definitely a driver issue. If u aren't skilled it doesn't matter what ur driving, I've seen idiots in rental Jeeps with foot plus clearence high center on obstacles that aren't really that challenging

I originally had a reactionary response to this... Like why should the burden be on Architects. Most of us would love to make a building as efficent as possible, but at the end of the day it all comes down to who's paying. Sometimes no matter how much u try to educate a client they don't care and will barely be swayed with "it's not to code" as a reason. There's sooo many people above us with more power pulling levers and making decisions and we're lucky some times to push a client in the direction of more sustainable (and expensive) windows that are above code minimums.

Then I read the article, and after pulling my head out of my own ass where I was apparently throwing myself a putty party, I came out agreeing with the author. Although we do not usually hold much leverage, even with organizations like AIA and Ncarb, we do have a unique position of understanding the complexities of how things go from being design to built should use that knowledge to help inform and guide movements for the betterment of the environment. For example, even if IEEC insulation regulations go up, it is up the the individual municipality to accept them, same with all building codes, and I can tell u there is Wide variation depending on how liberal the municipality is and this can be just from county to county.

So while I want to blame everyone else that is responsible for allowing the wrong codes from being rattified or rich developer for skimping on windows and insulation(still legal cause energy codes) in a high rise, it's on architects to educate and try to push the system from the bottom.

Thought this man was rolling a joint at first glance.

"researchers did not take into account the details of internet activity" seems like a pretty big hole in the study...