1678
Earbuds (reddthat.com)

We used to have earbuds that don't need to be charged because they had a headphone jack, didn't get lost so easily because they had a cord attached to a headphone jack, never lost the bluetooth connection because they had a headphone jack, and they cost less because they had a headphone jack. https://bsky.app/profile/daisyfm.bsky.social/post/3l3mfjc6sn62k

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] 1stTime4MeInMCU@mander.xyz 223 points 2 months ago

But they did tangle all the time. That was annoying.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 142 points 2 months ago

And the cord would sometimes break inside/connector went bad.

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 87 points 2 months ago

Yeah, you'd snag the wire or slightly bend the connector and then you were just playing a game of making sure it stayed plugged into the exact right angle.

[-] silasmariner@programming.dev 27 points 2 months ago

Had to make sure there has just the right tension on the left wire or you'd only get half the track. Bonus points for weirdly mixed stereo where that just sounded shit

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] goldteeth@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 2 months ago

and then you'd just replace them with one of the other three dozen you bought from Wal-Mart for five bucks back in 2016

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 48 points 2 months ago

And people wonder how the Great Pacific Garbage Patch and others like it came to be 🤦

[-] goldteeth@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 2 months ago

hey I'll have you know I keep all my broken earbuds in the same box in the garage with all the other cables and assorted dongles I can no longer identify and will likely never use, like any responsible citizen should

[-] Lemminary@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

I don't think earbuds make up a significant percentage of the patch to be here virtue signaling and shaming people for what they were encouraged to do by corporate greed. Your source says the great majority of the patch comes from agriculture and fishing.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] tetris11@lemmy.ml 19 points 2 months ago

If you think Bluetooth earphones won't also be in that pile once the batteries stop holding charge after 2 years, you're in for a world of dissapointing sex

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NiPfi@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago

Yeah! That's why I loved Sennheiser IEMs, they had oval cables that never tangle up, no matter what you do. Still have a pair for my Switch

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] AndyMFK@lemmy.dbzer0.com 178 points 2 months ago

All these people saying they like wireless earphones are completely missing the point. Devices with headphones jacks can do both. Taking away the headphone jack means you have to rely on wireless earphones, which have all the issues the post describes.

[-] fallingcats@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 2 months ago

Wdym, there are adapters and natively wired USB-C headphones.

[-] Killer57@lemmy.ca 26 points 2 months ago

Those adapters are complete and utter shit

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] IzzyScissor@lemmy.world 115 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It also destroyed the "pass the aux cord" when driving with friends.

"Hey, I want to show you a song. Pass the aux cord."

Plugs

Plays

Now:

"Hey, I want to show you a song. Let me connect to your car's Bluetooth."

"Oh, I can't while the car is driving. Can you pull over for a minute?"

"Which submenu was is it in? Bluetooth or Settings?"

"Do you mind if I remove one of the devices already connected?"

"Oh, it just auto-connected to your phone instead."

"Here, I'll just send you a link."

"Your phone locked. Can you enter your password again?"

"Oh, you don't have [streaming service] premium? We'll have to sit through an ad first."

[-] infinite_ass@leminal.space 40 points 2 months ago

I feel a cold and detached anger, reading that.

Still can't get my honda to Bluetooth.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[-] huginn@feddit.it 91 points 2 months ago

What do you mean used to? I still do. IEMs with replaceable cables are nigh on indestructible.

[-] Hegar@fedia.io 31 points 2 months ago

Yeah this is just another case of apple diehards forgetting the rest of the world exists. Almost everyone still has earbuds with cords.

[-] kambusha@sh.itjust.works 57 points 2 months ago

Hardly just Apple. Android phones have been shifting to removing the headphone jack as well. The workaround is meant to be to use a USB-C dongle, but I ended up just getting multiple bluetooth headsets. I miss my wired earbuds though, that I could hang from my ear when I needed to talk to someone, and never had to worry about charging.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Wardacus16@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago

Really? From personal experience it's completely the opposite. Almost everyone I see wearing earbuds are wearing wireless ones and it's not just Apple users with their air pods, it's android as well.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 87 points 2 months ago

I've thrown away so many headphones because the cable frayed though. There's always some downsides.

[-] reev@sh.itjust.works 28 points 2 months ago

What do y'all do to your headphones that this is a major issue? I've never really had wireless headphones and I think I've maybe had one pair of wired ones that had that issue in my life.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] MoogleMaestro@lemmy.zip 63 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I didn't believe the hype about wireless headphones until I bought some with noise cancelling and all that for around $130.

Pros:

1 - You don't realize how "tethered" you feel on older headphones until you really try to use wireless headphones. There's a certain freedom you feel when you realize you can place your phone on a hotel table but lie down in bed.

2 - Noise cancelling and noise passthrough is a transformative experience when travelling or find yourself abroad. Airports are much easier to feel relaxed in when 80% of the noise or so can be filtered out as you wait for your flight to board. Additionally, the flight experience is less annoying (no engine drone gets through, even passengers can mostly be ignored) but you still have the option for pass through if someone absolutely needs to talk to you.

3 - Many of these headphones come with some kind of EQ feature, which can occasionally mean that you get speakers with more tunability and thus slightly better bang-for-buck that works globally across apps.

4 - Audio quality. Since these are expensive drivers, you're often going to get better sound quality than those cheap 30 dollar throw aways were ever going to give.

Cons:

1 - Latency. These things could never be used in professional audio situations other than listening to a pre-rendered song for quality judgements. I don't thing gaming would be nice with these either, even if I've tried (and failed) to play counter strike on these on occasion to keep noise levels down.

2 - Mic quality of the built in is lacking on my particular headphones (Sennheiser CX Plus). They're really only intended to capture the outdoor for noise cancellation IMO, not the greatest for calls or recordings. They're servicable, but it's the area I'd like the most upgrade (and it would probably improve noise cancellation features as well.)

3 - Environmental / Sustainability Concerns: Other than people just "losing" these devices with built in batteries that are bad for the environment being a problem in and of itself, there are other long-standing concerns I have about these devices. They often require proprietary non-open software to configure, meaning if the software gets delisted, you will no longer be able to configure them until someone comes up with some kind of alternative using reverse engineering (good luck). Batteries are likely to degrade over time, meaning you'll eventually end up with a worthless ear bud on the left or right and the only solution will be to throw them out. These things are often pretty bad scoring on repairability metrics, and I can't even blame the companies producing them here because they're so small.

4 - Despite passthrough being a feature, it's hard to convey to people that you can actually hear them through the device. There should be some kind of blinking light on the outside that indicates that passthrough is enabled or something.

So I actually do love these devices, but #3 of the cons is really the biggest real issue I have with them. If they're going to cost over 100 dollars, I would like to know that these things won't just become ewaste in the same way that cheap crappy wired headphones end up being as well (which sea life often chokes on or gets tangled up in.) If they costs a premium, I would really like to know that they aren't a figurative dead end when they eventually fail.

load more comments (21 replies)
[-] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 63 points 2 months ago

Meh. I don't miss getting the cord caught on door handles and having the earbuds violently yanked from my ears!

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 62 points 2 months ago

On the other hand, bluetooth headphones never catch on a doorknob and yank out of your ears

[-] OrangeJoe@lemm.ee 42 points 2 months ago

On the other other hand, we already had the option of choosing Bluetooth headphones back when most phones still offered headphones jacks.

Truth is, there are obviously pros and cons of each, but it just sucks that we no longer have the choice without jumping through extra hoops.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 62 points 2 months ago

They also didn't add an extra layer of compression between the player and your ears - because they had a fucking headphone jack and wires that could transmit audio data without compression.

[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago

In ancient times, the wire also acted as antenna to pick up FM radio

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Logical@lemmy.world 53 points 2 months ago

Tbh I like the convenience of not being physically attached to my phone when listening to music. That said, the removal of headphone jacks from phones is a disgrace.

load more comments (15 replies)
[-] Madrigal@lemmy.world 49 points 2 months ago

And they used to get tangled on everything all the time, got caught on things all the time, frayed and wore out all the time, had janky connectors that had to be jiggled to sit in just the right position to get stereo sound, and got tied in knots when you put them away not matter how carefully you wound them.

There’s a reason everyone is using Bluetooth now, gramps.

[-] candyman337@sh.itjust.works 29 points 2 months ago

Bluetooth is lower fidelity, and I'd rather have tangled cables and ports than batteries that only last 5 years or less.

load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ZeffSyde@lemmy.world 43 points 2 months ago

A friend was complaining that he was always losing his air pods. I told him about my awesome idea to sell a little cord that would connect them so they were easier to keep track of.

He was like, 'Dude! That's a great idea... You've got to start selling those before someone beats you to it-'

Then it dawned on him and he called me an asshat.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] b0gl@sh.itjust.works 42 points 2 months ago

Last time I used wired headphones on my old phone, I was riding a bike. One of the buds slipped out of my ear and got caught in the front wheel, dragging my phone out of my pocket and smashing the screen. 10/10

[-] Plopp@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago

I wish I could watch a video of that.

Also, headphone cords go under clothing when doing activities like that.

[-] MadBob@feddit.nl 19 points 2 months ago

https://www.isadoraduncan.org/about-1

Isadora Duncan’s death was as dramatic as her life. On September 14, 1927, she encountered a young driver in Nice, France and suggested he take her for a spin in his open-air Bugatti sports car. As the car took off, she reportedly shouted to her friends, “Adieu, mes amis, je vais a la gloire!” — “Goodbye my friends, I go to glory!” Moments later, her trailing shawl became entangled in the rear wheel, breaking her neck instantly.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] gencha@lemm.ee 37 points 2 months ago

These jacks are still in every other audio device. They were removed from phones to force BT usage, which Google needs for their profiling telemetry network and Apple for their Find my Device thing. God forbid someone turns BT off or even decides they would prefer a phone without BT entirely. There is no other reason and how people prefer to listen to music has nothing to do with the subject.

load more comments (16 replies)
[-] zante@lemmy.wtf 30 points 2 months ago

I got some wireless headphones and now I keep leaving my phone behind.

Because I hear music, I assume my phone is in my pocket and sometimes it isn’t.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] JayDee@lemmy.ml 30 points 2 months ago

This issue is solely the fault of capitalism. By removing choice you are forced to by a more premium product, but you're advertised it by all the supposed benefits: one less external opening on the phone, no more tangled headphones, no more dealing with headphones that only work when the cord is plugged in just right, no more chance of your headphone port going bad.

They skip over the fact that most of these issues are directly problematic because of cost cutting and designed obsolescence (aka engineered lifetimes). The opening is one thing, but headphones tangle in pockets easily because they use such thin flimsy cords. Same thing goes for cords breaking in the lining and only working at certain angles: a more robust cord would be less prone to issues.

On top of this, the entire designs of phones not having repairability in mind is the only reason that a headphone port breaking is a big deal. If they were designed to be disassembled with replacement parts being readily available, it wouldn't be an issue. They could even make the ports more robust to decrease failure rate.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] obinice@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago

What do you mean used to?

That's still what I use. I have seen people using the wireless ones though, they seem quite popular at the moment.

I'm just not sold on the idea of earphones that have planned obsolescence built in, and require Bluetooth.

My current earphones are fab, I've been using them for 10 years now, and they plug in to everything and work with everything.

Why downgrade to something that'll have a ruined battery after 2 years, doesn't work with most stuff, and let's also not forget sometimes doesn't work at all because the battery might need charging.

My wired earphones have not once refused to work for any reason, period.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 27 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

We used to have transportation that didn't need gas because horse, and didn't need expensive roads because horse, and never needed an oil change becuase horse, and they cost less because horse.

[-] FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 months ago

The key difference is cars are a strictly superior version of horses. Horses do need fuel, they're slow, maintenance is time-intensive/expensive, can't take you as far...

Wireless earbuds' superiority is not so clear-cut. There are pros and cons for both, and I hate that some execs are trying to force me to buy their overpriced garbage.

I wouldn't mind wireless earbuds if it wasn't for the rare earth minerals they require for their battery, if planned obsolescence wasn't a core "feature", and if I had a choice to keep using the cheap wired headphones I've used for years before they started enshittifying phones.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] FlashZordon@lemmy.world 26 points 2 months ago

The ease of pairing Bluetooth headphones lately is pretty nice as well as not having to run a wire up my shirt to avoid snagging.

I do look back kind of fondly on physically plugging in my headphones and just having it work.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] gmtom@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago

I really can't stand people that make this argument, I felt the same way at first, but then I actually started using Bluetooth headphones and they are frankly just better, in almost every way.

And if you really want wired headphones still, you can just buy an inline adapter for like £2.

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] Paranomaly@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 months ago

All the stories of people complaining about wire troubles as apologists for cell phone manufacturers read like scenes from an infomercial.

I'd gladly take a phone without a camera before I took one without a headphone jack.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Phoenix3875@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

There are USB-C headphones.

[-] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago

We used to be able to use headphones and charge our phones at the same time

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Luccus@feddit.org 22 points 2 months ago

Which cannot connect to a phone unless it's unlocked, as accepting every USB-C connection carries security risks. They also require negotiation, which can fail at any time, meaning you have to unlock, disconnect, reconnect.

I also have a nice, external (and still cheap) DAC on my computer. It has a headphone jack. This means I need to be able to disconnect the USB-C dongle from my headphones, unless I want to have two separate headphones for my phone and my PC. By extension this requires me to go searching for the dongle from time to time.

I love USB-C. But the headphone jack had what companies and people claim to want: simplicity.

Headphone jacks solved a single but extremly common problem very well. USB-C provides a workaround for it.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 20 points 2 months ago

I was so pissed when Apple took the 3.5mm jack because I knew the rest would follow, and they did.

OTOH, now that I've gone to the dark side, I listen to music more often and enjoy it more thoroughly because I'm not dealing with tangled cables or having them accidentally yanked out of my ears, and therefore I'm more likely to have my earbuds with me. (they are now always in a pocket in my backpack) I can even fairly comfortably go to sleep with them on, which I do often.

I understand the audiophile arguments, and I'm sure that even with Buds2 Pro, SSC, and some fairly painstaking attention to EQ/DSP settings I'm leaving something on the table. I don't care about whatever that something is. I haven't enjoyed music this much and this often since I was prepubescent.

I have nothing bad to say about anyone else's choices, but the rush to shit on bluetooth earbuds gets a little "I don't even own a TV" sometimes. (for folks old enough to remember that kinda snobby trope around Y2K or so)

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2024
1678 points (100.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

5741 readers
1656 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS