[-] flamingleg@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago

because if you don't see it - it disappears! like magic!

the angry chud whos economic stability has been shattered by a neoliberal race to the bottom, the chud who can't afford to live in the same town he grew up in, who has been directed to view every moral or class grievance in purely racial terms by the corporate media. When that same chud dares to express any anger or resentment or hostility, and he expresses that anger to his cultural out group, at least YOU will be there! to wag your finger in his face and moralise to him about how people's feelings are important, even as you ignore his.

censoring someone doesn't change their mind, if anything it hardens their velief and encourages them to spread it elsewhere

[-] flamingleg@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago

the minimum would be transparency for the algorithm. If users can see exactly what a social media algorithm is doing with their content feed, they would always have a way to identify and escape dark patterns of addiction.

But this minimum itself would require powers to compel tech companies to give up what they would describe as intellectual property. Which would probably require a digital bill of rights?

The most practical option would be to just ask your kids directly about the kinds of content they've been consuming and why. Dinner table conversations can probably reveal those dark patterns just as well

[-] flamingleg@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

we're in a reality where syria is controlled by isis-like headchopping terrorists, and our western governments drape these terrorists in liberal moderate language to make them more palatable to western audiences. By paying your taxes, by supporting your western country you are giving material indirect support to literal wahabbist terrorists. You going to your job and pretending to yourself and others that your silly middle class existence is somehow 'civilised' because your don't say the n word or cuss is materially much closer to violent terrorism than some chud saying crude words on his day off.

What bothers you isn't a proximity to evil or violence, your everyday ordinary existence materially entangles you in that process. What bothers you is strict conformance to civility politics. What bothers you is people saying uncomfortable things, because your bourgeois, performative morality places you and your paper-mache feelings at the center of the moral universe.

[-] flamingleg@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 days ago

nobody is forcing you to play it, and nobody is forcing you to go to a forum and talk about it. If it bothers you so much just don't go there?

You guys realise that censoring racist content doesn't modify or remove the underlying belief right? just like closing your eyes doesn't make you invisible...

[-] flamingleg@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 week ago

a globe-spanning mossad influence operation which manipulates our politicians, business-people and academics from the shadows with child rape and blood sacrifice is already pretty grand ...

what larger context do you mean? spiritual warfare?

[-] flamingleg@lemmy.ml 29 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

china already have a supercritical carbon dioxide system integrated into a functioning powergrid and operating commercially. The system exploits an exotic phase of co2 which expands to fill a volume like gas, but moves frictionlessly through tubes as a liquid. There are concerns about lifespan because of how caustic the system is, but apparently some new materials are being trialled which negate this.

[-] flamingleg@lemmy.ml 14 points 3 weeks ago

do they have a gofundme i can donate to?

[-] flamingleg@lemmy.ml 26 points 3 weeks ago

this is funny and everything but there was no reason for him to be in the mcdonalds, wearing the same outfit, carrying a buffet of incriminating evidence. It doesn't make any sense at all. He's probably innocent, like for real innocent. Or at worst a fall-guy for thompson's wife, who gained the most feom his death and now doesn't have to go through messy divorce proceedings to get her hands on a good chunk of his wealth. That should have been the starting point for the investigation, but the whole thing became a circus.

[-] flamingleg@lemmy.ml 43 points 3 weeks ago

not having kids is one of the few things i am utterly, truly grateful for.

[-] flamingleg@lemmy.ml 14 points 4 weeks ago

it's time to start dragging these people out of their homes...

view more: next ›

flamingleg

joined 1 month ago