[-] Zalack@startrek.website 5 points 2 years ago

So gamble? The only proven way to reliably make money on investing are things like index funds, which you will need a fair amount of starting capital to make a living off of.

[-] Zalack@startrek.website 6 points 2 years ago

I didn't know that! I just subbed to their service for Make Some Noise so I kind of feel better about shelling out for it now.

[-] Zalack@startrek.website 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Is !lostlemmings a thing anywhere?

[-] Zalack@startrek.website 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I think the problem is that there is less often something to be said if you agree. Every now and then you might have something to add that fleshes out the idea or adds additional context, but generally if I totally agree with a comment I just upvote it.

On the other hand, when you disagree with something your response will, by logical necessity, be different from the parent comment.

So if you want to prioritize "adding something novel" there's a logical bias towards comments that disagree since only some percentage of agreement will tick that box.

Otherwise you end up with a bunch of comments that literally or figuratively add up to "this".

[-] Zalack@startrek.website 6 points 2 years ago

More good options is always a good thing.

[-] Zalack@startrek.website 5 points 2 years ago

Same. I write FOSS software in my free time and also paid.

[-] Zalack@startrek.website 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Man, I really think you should either saddle up, don't block ads, or use a free, non-ad-supported alternative.

Sync is made by a single dev who uses it as his main source of income. It's not made by a corporation. Taking the fruits of someone's labor, that they have priced to make it worth their time, feels kinda shitty to me.

If you really feel it's so much better than the alternatives that you won't even use them, then pay what the person making it feels they need to keep making it.

[-] Zalack@startrek.website 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I work in the film industry and can say, with certainty, that TNG was not shot with the same consideration.

Television back then knew it was being mastered for SDTV and the artists had a good idea of what it meant they could get away with compared to something that would be screened in 35mm. Final screening medium has always been the most important consideration, not capture medium.

Audiences have also gotten less forgiving of visual quality and less willing to suspend disbelief as the bar for quality has steadily risen. It means that shows are both working on higher definition target mediums and under more scrutiny than ever.

Like, I love TNG but go watch and tell me that it looks half as good as SNW.

[-] Zalack@startrek.website 4 points 2 years ago

I just want you to know that I hate your username.

[-] Zalack@startrek.website 5 points 2 years ago

Free and Open Source Software

[-] Zalack@startrek.website 5 points 2 years ago

Imo that's pretty unethical. If you don't want ads, use an app where the maintainer has decided not to include ads or not to charge.

But don't take something from a sole-developer (meaning in this case labor is actually getting all the fruits of their labor instead of a CEO), use one of the other options instead where the developers aren't using it as their main source of income.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

Zalack

joined 2 years ago