398
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlashMobOfOne@beehaw.org 112 points 1 year ago

Good.

One of my good friends was one of the voices on LA Noire years ago and gets zero residuals from it. It's maddening.

[-] MJBrune@beehaw.org 20 points 1 year ago

🤷‍♂️I've made multiple million-dollar titles and haven't gotten more than a paycheck from them. I really don't think VAs should get much if any in the way of residuals. Engineers, artists, and designers should get a huge portion of the profits. Giving VAs even a 1% residual is a slap in the face of the rest of the team who build those games. Not to mention the whole team of LA Noire was laid off later that year.

[-] mycorrhiza@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 year ago

just give everyone residuals

[-] MJBrune@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

Someone else made an interesting point how a lot of people don't get residuals. That residuals don't make sense for some jobs. For a VA in the background of a small indie games, do you think it's okay for them to require residuals for their work? This lawsuit focuses on large AAA studios but it will set a dangerous precedent. There any many actors who have to find loop holes to build smaller movie projects. "We technically paid ourselves then invested it into the movie" sort of thing.

That said giving everyone residuals is better than giving no one residuals.

[-] mycorrhiza@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

I will just say I think everyone involved in a project should be paid a fraction of the proceeds roughly in proportion to the work and sweat they contribute

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] magikmw@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

x_doubt.jpeg

[-] MJBrune@beehaw.org 69 points 1 year ago

What people might not catch is that this isn't artists, designers or engineers. It's voice actors only. I'm all for people getting what they deserve but as I see voice actors in the games industry demand profit sharing and more rights, I'm reminded that those who actually make the games don't get that. They have overtime without pay.

[-] Lowbird@beehaw.org 111 points 1 year ago

Voice actors are among "those who actually make the games." Voice acting in particular also is strenuous work that can and does cause physical injury when workers are compelled to work long hours doing rough voices and so on. People end up having to have surgery on their vocal cords.

We don't need to devalue voice actors to value other game industry workers. The only difference is the voice actors organized first, probably because of the injury risk, and when you form a union you have to define a group that you can reach and coordinate. It shouldn't be an us vs them among works.

[-] comicallycluttered@beehaw.org 39 points 1 year ago

Don't forget mocap. A lot of actors are doing mocap for games now, which also potentially results in injury.

This also includes stunt workers (who do the more intensive motion capture work) and stunt coordinators, many of whom are in the Screen Actors Guild already.

[-] MJBrune@beehaw.org 10 points 1 year ago

They should then let engineers, artists, and designers in their union.

[-] Snowcano@startrek.website 29 points 1 year ago

There are different unions for different trades. Stop trying to sound so smart, you keep failing.

[-] MJBrune@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

There are no unions for those trades in games currently. I'm not trying to sound smart. I am trying to tell you why I think VAs are overreaching here.

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Oh, great, trade unions. That never caused any issues for worker's unity. If you can't organise everyone, from tech lead to cleaning staff, in the same industrial union you're playing right into the capitalists' divide and conquer game.

[-] crapwittyname@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Not so. It makes sense to organise in trade unions. The heads of those unions are on the same side most of the time, as it would be in this case, and they can easily coordinate their actions. But in some cases the interests of one trade have no bearing on another, or are even in opposition, in which case it would be somewhere between difficult and impossible to organise a balloted action across the entire union. Thus nullifying the strength of the union and playing right into the capitalist's hands.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] hypelightfly@kbin.social 43 points 1 year ago

They need to unionize too. Also count actors are included in the "actually make the games" group. Everyone should be paid well, don't drag a group trying to fix that down because the rest aren't doing anything.

[-] MJBrune@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago

My bad I didn't mean to imply they don't work on the game.

[-] FlowVoid@midwest.social 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Voice actors have a union.

Designers and engineers generally don't. Yet.

[-] fracture@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago

for those in america, CWA, Communication Workers of America, is a union that's trying to reach out to the developers in the game industry

[-] Bipta@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

I’m reminded that those who actually make the games don’t get that. They have overtime without pay.

Yes, capitalism fucks everyone every day unless you fight for what you deserve, usually for decades, and even then only getting half of it. It's surprising that keeping this in mind requires reminders.

[-] Crankpork@beehaw.org 15 points 1 year ago

A better deal for one group helps the rest of them by setting precedent.

[-] RandoCalrandian@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Or ensures the others get locked out, as the business feels the financial sting of the first effort

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] ampersandrew@kbin.social 32 points 1 year ago

Correct me if I'm wrong, but since this strike is against certain companies and not some entity that represents the entire industry like it does for movies and television, that means that other individual companies who come to an agreement can still hire these people, right? If so...imagine if we had that in movies and television.

[-] Zalack@startrek.website 50 points 1 year ago

We do. A24, for instance, is still making a couple movies by agreeing to work under the proposed terms by SAG. As far as I know, no one else has made such agreements yet. The more of such exceptions that get made, the weaker the AMPTP's position will get.

[-] ram@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Dropout.tv (formerly CollegeHumour) is also an unstruck company.

[-] Discola@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

One more reason to love dropout!

[-] EssentialCoffee@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago

Because they have a different contract for work not covered by the current strike? That seems kind of a weird take, especially since they thought the strike did apply to them originally and they shut down for several weeks until the lawyers got together and said, oh no, you have a different type of agreement.

It's not like they changed or updated their contract to become exempt. SAG just went, oh, your business doesn't fall into the terms of the strike so you don't have to strike with the rest of us.

[-] Zalack@startrek.website 6 points 1 year ago

I didn't know that! I just subbed to their service for Make Some Noise so I kind of feel better about shelling out for it now.

[-] ampersandrew@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

Oh, I see. I thought all of Hollywood was AMPTP and that's why we can't have nice things like DRM-free movie purchases.

[-] gaael@beehaw.org 19 points 1 year ago

I never wondered about the conditions of videogames workers, but I'm really happy that they get better thanks to this movement !

[-] theangriestbird@beehaw.org 16 points 1 year ago

It's 10x worse than whatever you're imagining.

[-] MJBrune@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

It all depends on where you work and what lines you personally draw in the sand. Some novice game developers will not draw a line in the sand near release and management will work them to death. Stress causality is the term for when people don't quit, don't say anything, and just stop showing up for work. If you work at a studio where crunch is normalized then usually there is a stress causality normalization too.

[-] Bipta@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

No guarantee anything gets better yet.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] PenguinTD@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

I wonder how many are actually in union to gain that bargain power?

[-] there1snospoon@ttrpg.network 7 points 1 year ago

I know most if not all of the cast of Critical Role (who are voice actors for many video games) are members. Ashley Johnson is the voice of Ellie for TLoU, so if they’re working on TLoU3, they’ll likely have to delay it.

[-] PenguinTD@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

I was hoping this extends to many other departments.

[-] ram@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

It doesn't, unfortunately. Programmers, animators, concept artists, designers, each need to unionize in order to leverage collective action grants at the bargaining table. With last week's decision by the NLRB though, it's certain to be easier than ever to get unionized. Still, the amount of coordination it gets to even petition the NLRB to have your union recognized is no small feat. Just now it'll be that much more difficult to bust a union election

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2023
398 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

30540 readers
109 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS