366
submitted 8 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Donald Trump still hasn’t posted bond in his New York civil fraud trial, but his lawyer Alina Habba wants you to know that it’s definitely not because they’re having trouble getting the massive amount together.

The former president was fined $354 million for committing real estate–related fraud in New York. In order to appeal the decision, Trump must post a bond of the full amount plus interest—which has already reached nearly $467 million, with interest adding $112,000 per day.

When asked Wednesday if Trump was any closer to posting bond, Habba had a very clear answer that raised no red flags.

“Yeah, no, unfortunately I can’t speak to that. That’s privileged, and I am the attorney, one of the attorneys on that case,” Habba told Fox News, stating the obvious.

She quickly pivoted to attacking the case altogether, calling the judgment “absurd” and expressing hope that an appeals court would overturn it.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] dugmeup@lemmy.world 99 points 8 months ago

When the actual fuck does the government go "you have not paid, we will start taking the money"?

Cause they will happily garnish your wages and take money from your bank account.

[-] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 65 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

March 25th is the deadline for this judgement. The judgement was made on Feb 16th, so that is basically 5 weeks plus a day or so to account for the weekend. Decision was made on a Friday, deadline is a Monday.

[-] snf@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

What happens on March 26th if there's still no payment or bond?

[-] Igloojoe@lemm.ee 16 points 8 months ago

New York will seize his properties in New York.

[-] aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

I would love it if NY seized his properties and turned them all into low-income housing.

Not that there’s anything wrong with low-income housing. It would just kill Trump to see his 🖐️ tremendous 👌 properties being inhabited by poors.

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

This is the best use of hand emojis I have ever seen. Outstanding!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

Something fun I hope

[-] NotAFakeHumanoid@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

The 26th is my B-day, so I'm wishing I get to see his shit seized that day.

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 22 points 8 months ago

I'll believe he's suffered consequences when I see his kids stuffing him down an open grave.

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 8 months ago

If he dies before facing consequences, the world will still be a worse place, because he’ll have shown all the other sociopaths how to get away with it.

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 6 points 8 months ago

If he dies before facing consequences, the world will still be a worse place, because he’ll have shown all the other sociopaths how to get away with it.

Would the world really be a worse place if sociopaths started dying so they could escape consequences?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 8 months ago

I believe there is a little leeway in there to allow for an appeal? He’s getting charged interest though, so it’s not like he’s off the hook.

[-] Vash63@lemmy.world 41 points 8 months ago

The bond is needed before you can appeal. It's like an escrow.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] BottleOfAlkahest@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

There is likely a deadline like 90 days or 180 days or something to allow someone to pull together the finances to pay such a judgement. In New York you must post the bond before appealing so it isn't leeway for an appeal which could take way longer.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] nucleative@lemmy.world 57 points 8 months ago

Nobody has 467+ million dollars in cash ready for transfer at any given moment, especially for something like this. That would be poor financial planning even for a billionaire. However... It's not like he didn't have a heads up that it's coming, so it seems like he didn't have his ducks in a row here.

I'm sure even Elon or Bill would have to make some annoyingly painful decisions to get that amount of cash on short notice.

It's telling that he is struggling to borrow against his properties to raise the capital. It suggests that behind the scenes banks are not offering him favorable terms. And even if he were to win on appeal, it will still be quite expensive for him. I'm guessing that in the bank's internal analysis they project the original judgment will stand and therefore are considering how much they will earn after they foreclose on his buildings and sell them. It's potentially sizable...

If the Trump name were removed from the tower the value might actually increase lol.

On the other hand, unless Trump is delusional (granted, it's possible), he must also know that winning on appeal is a long shot and therefore this money, once he puts it up, is gone. I guess his efforts to borrow rather than sell to raise capital are his version of YOLO. Because he's either president and figures out how to stall, or he's old already in the consequences will be short-lived.

[-] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 40 points 8 months ago

Yeah "no one has $467 million dollars on hand" except Trump reported to the court he had $400 million on hand and he had plenty of time to prep just in case.

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

Hmm I wonder if Trump's ever inflated his asset values before

[-] Kuvwert@lemm.ee 10 points 8 months ago

Somebody should look into that...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

Nobody has 467+ million dollars in cash ready for transfer at any given moment

That's OK. The point is that nobody wants to lend him that amount of money anymore. So either he does not offer enough collateral, or no-one deems whatever he offers worth it. And those companies who have the money to do this usually know how to estimate someones worth...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] brygphilomena@lemmy.world 47 points 8 months ago

I would love it if NYC siezed his trump tower and turned it into migrant housing.

[-] Nobody@lemmy.world 46 points 8 months ago

The Barack and Michelle Obama Center for Refugees Seeking Asylum

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago

Massive Institute Granting Refugees Asylum Now Tower (MIGRANT)

[-] Guntrigger@feddit.ch 6 points 8 months ago

Trump Refugee, Undocumented Migrant Plus Asylum Seeker Shelter Housing Organization Limited Enterprise

[-] ButtermilkBiscuit@lemmy.world 46 points 8 months ago

Don't worry guys we all know trump is a "billionaire" he will easily post this bond without needing an insurance company to bail him out. I'm sure he's probably got 450m just laying around in boxes at maralago. We all know he's super fancy and rich and has big hands.

[-] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago

He did claim at one point he had $400M in liquidity available... so that would cover most of it. A "reputable" businessman like himself shouldn't have any issue finding someone that can help post bond for the remainder, surely.

[-] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

Didn't he say at one point that part of his net worth was the value of his name? Maybe he can just sell that, and we can legitimately start calling him by one of the popular aliases.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 38 points 8 months ago

Maybe he can ask his pal at Chubb.

[-] Zier@fedia.io 33 points 8 months ago

Donald trump is so rich, he can afford to lose a casino. He's a gazillion-aire. He's immune, and it was "a perfect phone call".

[-] 7u5k3n@lemmy.world 33 points 8 months ago

I bet this goes all the way to the election... If he wins he makes it vanish. Or well attempts to do so... If he loses.. he will fuck off out of the US.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 54 points 8 months ago

Can't. it's a state civil trial. presidents can't do that.

Really, the only way he can make this go away is to shut up and pay.

And he's constitutionally incapable of either.

[-] thesporkeffect@lemmy.world 35 points 8 months ago

He can't legally, but that's not a major impediment for him

[-] APassenger@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago

If he's president he can do a variety of things "legally" that benefit moneyed interests in the US or elsewhere.

If his son in law can get a billion dollar loan, trump can too.

If the house is Republican led, there could be no real repurcussuons except in an election.

[-] mPony@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

an election

oh like you'll get one of those again

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Nope. In 30 days or whatever it is now, if he doesn’t put it up. Chubb pays for him seizes whatever collateral was put up.

It’s probably his real estate because it’s the only thing he has of significant value.

It is possible that Chubb didn’t cut him any favors and it really “just is” business. If they took say 2x in collateral, depending on the contract, they could make quite a bit of bank on that deal- or whatever they figured it was overvalued by.

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 30 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Chubb put up the appeals bond for his defamation trial.

This is talking about the appeals bond for his fraud trial. Chubb (currently) has no stake in that one and Trump (currently) hasn't posted a bond for that. He has until March 25th to do so or else the state of New York is gonna be getting $400 million of new real estate.

And they won't use Trump's fraudulent valuations, either.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

Ah. Even simpler then. When it expires it goes to collections and the state starts seizing assets. Either way… that’s unlikely to not be resolved before he’s the president.

[-] ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com 13 points 8 months ago

My money is on this stalling being so the Truth Social merger goes through and he can loan against his stake there, that or sell shares. The preliminary valuation puts Trumps part of the post-merger company at up to $4 billion, which is absurd but also he does have an extremely specific demographic completely captured over there. It's marketing gold for unscrupulous companies and niche stuff that won't ever sell to city Dems, like truck nuts and tacticool gear.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] baru@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Chubb put up the appeals bond for his defamation trial.

There's an article which explains that the financial document says it'll take months for that bond to be valid and it has various ways to get out of the "bond". Meaning, they were trying to get the judge to sign off on a bond which wasn't a bond.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 6 points 8 months ago

bet this goes all the way to the election... If he wins he makes it vanish. Or well attempts to do so...

That does appear to be his plan.

Hopefully it fails in multiple ways.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago
[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago
[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] dirthawker0@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago

Headline should be "Has No Idea How to Post That Massive Fraud Bond Without Actually Paying Any of His Own Money"

[-] III@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

He could pay all of his own money and still not know how to post the entire bond because of how much would still be left to pay.

[-] mipadaitu@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

He could have all the money he needs, and still not know how to post the entire bond, because he's an idiot with a moron for a lawyer.

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

Can they seize his assets?

[-] Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee 7 points 8 months ago

They absolutely can, after the deadline later this month.

The question is will they seize his assets?

[-] anarchy79@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

"Yeaaaah... No."

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2024
366 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19107 readers
2612 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS