161
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 82 points 1 year ago

So, am I the only one wondering if the hot mic gaff was staged?

You know.

To make him look big and tough for the media?

[-] match@pawb.social 45 points 1 year ago

I respect a good political gambit though, if it's done well it's just a reminder that they're staffed by reasonably competent people

[-] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 year ago

Of course it is, Bidens whole shtick is looking like he’s going to do something without committing in any meaningful way.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Second question.

Is that face AI generated? He looks like a Heel about lay the smack down in some WWE baby face.

That, or a plastic mannequin.

Edit: for reference:

[-] Hominine@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

And here we have attacks on the president's appearance? How very progressive of you: saving Gazan lives, one demented post at a time.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

You don’t find that expression a little, odd?

If it’s not AI manipulated, then it’s like those pictures of cats mid yawn. Either way, his expression looks, how shall we say, “dramatic”?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Nudding@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

They photoshopped him to look less like a sleepy skeleton.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

it’s just regular photoshop

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I mean, that's the entire Democrats' MO, but we cannot speak ill of Democrats while Trump exists, don't you know!

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Hominine@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Seeing such pro-Trump rhetoric from this account in just about every Biden post while fibbing about his administration's stance on, say, abortion is really laying the agenda bare. One thinks such a troll would be a touch more subtle.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

It’s amusing you think I’m pro Trump.

That’s hilarious.

His stance on say abortion is split between his personal views and his political views. Like most things, I don’t think he’s capable of doing what’s necessary to protect our freedoms.

Making abortion medication available through telemedicine does nothing to stop the erosion that’s currently underway, and even then, can- and will- be removed by the next Republican in office.

His climate change agenda has been mere lip service compared to the oil production- which is record setting.

He’s done nothing- to my knowledge- to actually protect voter’s rights.

It’s taken his DoJ the better part of 3 years to get a warrant to recover extremely sensitive materials. They still don’t have all of it back. And it’s take. His DoJ the better part of 3 years to get a special prosecutor to investigate a man that started insurrection.

You want to call me a troll? Fair enough. But don’t come crying to me when trump starts a second insurrection. Or you know, wins in November.

I tried to warn you. But you wouldn’t listen.

[-] Hominine@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So noble to warn us while advising we ignore the evidence of our ears from just yesterday. I know where Biden stands with respect to women's rights and seeing you twist that position says everything it needs to. That you go on to think the president can pull all the levers of government by fiat is unsurprising and seems almost a feature here with the regularity that it is regurgitated.

Anti-Biden to a degree with which one is compelled to lie or pro-trump is a distinction without a difference by my lights.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I never said he could act unilaterally. I do think he could have done more, and didn't.

how much of this list is more to do with Harris, and people in the relevant agencies pushing for it. People like Becerra leading the HHS. I don't know... I suspect a lot of it is actually from Harris' contributions.

I suspect that if he legitimately wanted to codify RvW, he would have gotten the filibuster suspended (he waffled on that, being apposed leading into it then switching,). There's enough popular support to have done that, with exactly 2 senators holding out- Manchin and Sinema. they're horse traders. and so is Biden.

Or he could have supported packing the courts. (here we see his lackluster leadership.); never seeing RvW get overturned in the first place. McConnell has already shown he'd pack the courts if could get away with it. He already has.

How much of that list, also, is going to go away the first moment a republican president gets into office? Some of it is already going to the courts (hence the bits about the DoJ defending it,). we need more than stop-gap executive orders and policies that can be reversed. And even then, you'll notice that with the VA, they're only providing abortion care for medical needs, or if it's the result of rape and incest. the bare minimum.

I don't think he's done enough. And I don't think, if we give him another four years, he's capable of doing enough. So yeah. call me Anti-Biden. That's a badge I'll wear happily. I don't support people who support genocide, and that's just one other issue. There's also how he's dove far-enough-right on immigration and border security, the GOP is trying to find new ways of being assholes.

[-] Hominine@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

You suspect Biden can do things that are politically untenable I suspect you support Trump and are just slinging shit against the wall. Perhaps we're both wrong.

[-] PatFussy@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

It's just how leftists like to operate. Live in half truths so deep that horseshoe theory looks suitable. People don't KNOW why they don't like Biden, they just don't want to like him because their favorite media propagandist said not to.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Centrists would rather lose to Trump than ever consider ceasing their support for Netanyahu's genocide.

[-] Hominine@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Nuance is lost here as it's possible to both support Biden and decry what is happening in Palestine. You'll notice no one here is in favor of genocide though the poster above is correct about people in left spaces loving to tar others with this word as well as other slanders. I suspect they have little concern about how far it carries whatever message they're trying to tote and is merely a symptom of being unable to argue an actual point.

Also, the country is largely centrist regardless of how many of us would like to believe the average person hews left. If you think I'm a centrist, you've got a rude awakening ahead.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Nudding@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I don't like him because of the record oil production, genocide, strike breaking, border stance, or his fucking weird old man comments. I also don't like trump because he's worse in every regard. You have no left representation in your country. This comment should be embarrassing to anyone with a mild understanding of political theory.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)

He had just watched the West Wing episode The US Poet Laureate

[-] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 37 points 1 year ago

How about instead of totally going to have a big talk with Bibi, that he comes right out and publicly denounces Israel and the genocide it’s committing?

Why not stop pushing to send billions in aid and weapons to Israel?

But no, he’s been accidentally “caught” saying he will do something, just like it was “leaked” that he thought they were being jerks months ago behind closed doors.

[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

He knew the mic was on. The camera was following right behind him. Ain't fooling nobody.

[-] TheOnlyMego@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

I don't think a "come to Jesus moment" is an effective threat against a Jewish man...

[-] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

I award him no credit for this. Same as we find out Republicans who privately despite Trump but publicly defend him.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2024
161 points (100.0% liked)

politics

24850 readers
2994 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS