161
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 26 points 2 years ago

. . . So you think not enabling genocide is unrealistic and unreasonable with reality?

The bar here is pretty low, stop sending Israel weapons and money, stop defending them in the UN, and stop saying you support them.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You don't prevent genocide by letting the guy who can't be convinced anything is a bad idea win instead of the guy who can.

If both options were reasonable then ok, let the other guy win as a matter of principle, but right now the alternative is way worse and won't help with your cause either.

[-] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 years ago

Okay so if this guy can be confined genocide is a bad idea, when exactly is that going to happen?

I didn’t think it was so challenging, but I guess Biden really struggles with this choice?

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

If Biden doesn't want to lose the votes of people who oppose genocide, he should stop supporting genocide.

Of course, he should also stop supporting genocide because it's genocide. But I guess he'd rather lose than miss out on being a part of it.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 years ago

And not voting ends up being support for more genocide

Just as I said, your logic works in a situation where either options are reasonable OR, I would add, if there's more than two options and governments are made of coalitions so you can vote for someone that will influence the party with the most vote to move in the direction that you want so they can form the government.

Neither options apply to the USA at the moment.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

And not voting ends up being support for more genocide

I'm voting for Biden. I also know that if he wants the votes of people for whom genocide is a dealbreaker, he needs to stop supporting genocide.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

These people would be hypocrites if they didn't vote for him as letting Trump win means more genocide as he'll do nothing about Gaza and leave Ukraine to fend for itself whereas a Democrat can at least be convinced to change his stance.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Ok. So they're hypocrites.

If Biden wants their votes, he needs to break with the pro-genocide centrist wing of his party and stop supporting genocide. I know this will bitterly disappoint every last centrist Democrat, but you can lecture them that they can't always get everything they want and that they need to vote blue no matter who.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

Then these people have no right to complain when things get worse.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

It's not like you want anyone who isn't 100% on board with genocide to have any right to complain now.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

No, I don't want anyone who doesn't vote or get personally involved in politics to complain about the people who get elected.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

If you say so. Frankly it just looks like you want anyone who doesn't like Biden's support for Netanyahu's genocide to shut up.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

People can not like it all they want, letting Trump take his place by not voting is just virtue signalling and pure idiocy.

"I didn't vote for this guy because he supports Israel!"

"Ok buddy, because of people like you the person now in power supports Israel, stopped support for Ukraine, is attacking women and minority rights... But hey, at least you didn't vote for someone who supports Israel, right?"

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Like so.

I'm voting for Biden. He should stop supporting genocide.

You should too.

[-] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

You think preventing this country from turning into a dictatorship that is planning to commit genocide on LGBTQs and women her is a low bar?

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

You think supporting genocide is acceptable as long as it's brown people in another country?

[-] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

I think destroying this country, eliminates any possibility of stopping genocide anywhere else. But you seem intent on supporting genocide everywhere...

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I don't support genocide at all. It's why I want Biden to stop.

[-] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

By helping Trump get elected and ensuring the continued and escalation of genocide both in the middle east and here.

Hmm.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

You can't defend Biden's support for genocide, so you pretend everyone who opposes genocide is a trump supporter.

[-] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I support the best chance for stopping/preventing genocide both in the middle east and here.

You don't, it's very simple.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Biden's support for genocide will cause him to lose the election.

I want him to stop because democrats should not be supporting genocide.

You want him to continue. It's that simple.

[-] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Supporting Trump and his dictatorship! Great choice!

Pan meet fire.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

You literally cannot tell the difference between wanting Biden to stop supporting genocide versus supporting Trump.

[-] Nudding@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Imagine being this indoctrinated into American exceptionalism.

this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2024
161 points (100.0% liked)

politics

26289 readers
2397 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS