158
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by can@sh.itjust.works to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

Lawyers for the FTX founder say he wasn’t motivated by greed but by a desire to better the world through philanthropic giving

(sans paywall courtesy of the only reason I have a bluesky account)

all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 136 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Even if it's true, fuck you for weaponizing your neurodivergence.

  • sincerely, an autistic person
[-] can@sh.itjust.works 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Weaponized autism is no joke.

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 11 points 10 months ago

Yeah, he pulled basically the same bullshit months ago with his ADHD (made a big legal deal about taking a fuckin pill at some point during the day to the extent that his legal team and the judge got involved in a matter that should be handled entirely between Sam and whoever his doctor is - clearly a my BrAin iS WEirD So tREaT Me sPEciAL tactic, which I have encountered before and find uniquely aggravating), which I personally live with, so I 100% get you.

[-] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago
[-] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 40 points 10 months ago

As I tell my two sons. "Being autistic does not entitle you to be an insufferable asshole".

Deal with it SBF.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 32 points 10 months ago

If he’s mentally incompetent to stand trial, that should have been brought up during pre trial.

They lost. They don’t get to rewind now that they don’t like the sentence.

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yeah, but he’s not mentally incompetent. This is an established behavior pattern for him. He tried this before last year with his ADHD. It was an obvious ploy then. It is an obvious ploy now.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 8 points 10 months ago

It's a dumb tactic because ADHD does not render you incapable of standing trial.

[-] Zahille7@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Neither does being autistic.

[-] JoBo@feddit.uk 4 points 10 months ago

Neither ADHD nor autism count as 'insanity' defences. They're neurological conditions, not mental illnesses that alter the perceived state of reality.

They're being advanced as mitigating factors for sentencing. He's entitled to do that and any competent lawyer would (and should) be making these arguments.

[-] maniel@lemmy.ml 29 points 10 months ago

Ok, exchange that for the hospital for life sentence that GTA VI leaker got, he's autistic too

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 19 points 10 months ago

Autistic doesn't mean you don't know right from wrong and you're still accountable for your actions.

The GTA leakers problem was that he didn't take the olive branch when it was offered to him.

[-] 520@kbin.social 10 points 10 months ago

The GTA leakers problem is that he would use any sort of leniency he could to initiate further attacks. The dude performed an attack while already in police custody,

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yes a lot of people said he should have been hired by the CIA or something but that won't work if he couldn't have be trusted to follow basic orders.

[-] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 13 points 10 months ago

From reading about the GTA leaker, he was repeatedly involved in hacking/extortion attempts with multiple companies causing millions in damages, and he repeatedly said that he would immediately go back to doing it again as soon as he got Internet access again.

So basically he's going to immediately start causing real world damages if released, and he has no intention of pretending otherwise or complying with any kind of probation/etc.

[-] Zahille7@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago
[-] deft@lemmy.wtf 18 points 10 months ago

"help I'm rich and retarded"

[-] TheGingerNut 17 points 10 months ago

How STUPID does he think the court are?

[-] Tyfud@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

Looking at how they're legislating from the bench for Trump, I think you may not like the answer to this question.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 10 months ago

The courts aren't stupid, it's just his lawyers that are. But that's rather self-selecting isn't it since any thinking lawyer wouldn't touch him with an electrified cattle prod, given the fact that he has a tendency to not pay people.

[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

You know what I didn't have to learn when I was learning to mask?

How to not be a greedy amoral asshole.

'Cuase that shit ain't autistic.

[-] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

Just give him a train set and his favorite movie to watch half of and restart before the end, should make it better.

[-] wrath_of_grunge@kbin.social 11 points 10 months ago

Lawyers for the FTX founder say he wasn’t motivated by greed but by a desire to better the world through philanthropic giving

the lie detector determined that was a lie.

[-] blahsay@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

This would be great for me. A precident that basically any engineer can get softer sentencing- excellent 👌

Seriously though no, that's not how autism works.

[-] Caligvla@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 months ago
this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2024
158 points (100.0% liked)

Not The Onion

12789 readers
949 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS