346
submitted 2 years ago by simple@lemm.ee to c/games@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 176 points 2 years ago

It's honestly amazing how well this game sold considering how mid the gameplay actually is. Having a popular IP really helped.

[-] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 77 points 2 years ago

Eh, people don't buy for the gameplay mechanics most of the time, they buy for what they see in the trailers and read in the descriptions. Being the only videogame available for this IP, having the WB marketing juggernaut behind it, releasing at a time of the year without much competition, coming out on every single platform - it would have been weird if this game wasn't the best selling one in 2023.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Kingofthezyx@lemm.ee 64 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

My wife, whose entire history with video games is Sims 3, Animal Crossing: NH, and Pokémon Go, played through this game start to finish and loved it. It wasn't really made for "gamers", it was made for Harry Potter fans that wanted to play a Hogwarts game. It didn't succeed as a gaming revolution, it succeeded in bringing non-gamers to buy it.

Personally, I love that she got into it whether it's mid or not, because it introduced her to a lot of the mechanics necessary to play "real" games in the future. And she had a lot of fun.

[-] theRealBassist@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago

I'm both a gamer and HP fan.

I thought the game was great, and I didn't really realize the depths of people's distaste for it, I guess.

Was it crazy revolutionary? No, but it was fun.

[-] ggppjj@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

Fellow HP fan, I was kinda weirded out by the whole "free access to unforgivable curses" and "canonically killing people" and the honestly kinda disheartening stance on goblin personhood but man flying around the grounds is so fun

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[-] FunnyUsername@lemmy.world 90 points 2 years ago

I'm playing this game right now and it's honestly a six out of 10. The only reason to launch the game at all is because of the world design which is top notch. So top notch it scores all of those six points, because the plot characters story and gameplay are all a let down otherwise. This is the type of game that will disable the controls for your magical flying broom and then tell you that you need to climb a wall. I wish it wasn't so successful so they didn't think this formula was so good, because if they made the game actually good AND a Harry Potter property, that would have really been something special. But as it is now, it's just an uninspired video game painted in a pretty coat of a popular franchise. I'm sure we'll get a sequel.

[-] PeterPoopshit@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I would have loved to have this game as a kid. It may be a 6 out of 10 but most of the other harry potter shovelware they shit out when the movies were coming was at best a 0.2 out of 10. The only arguably not that bad one was the prisoner of azkaban movie based game.

[-] kusttra@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

IDK. Most of the early games were actually pretty entertaining. I fairly recently played sorcerer's stone on the gbc, and it was still pretty fantastic.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] Napain@lemmy.ml 65 points 2 years ago

poped in to say transrights! that'll be all

[-] dumpsterlid@lemmy.world 46 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

fuck harry potter, read terry pratchett

[-] Silentiea@lemm.ee 22 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Can I just read Pratchett without fucking anyone? I'm ace and it's just really smelly and uncomfortable.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Carighan@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

Bit unfair, because when compared to Terry Pratchett, just about everything else gets tossed to read more Pratchett. 😅

(not that I disagree, Pratchett is best)

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] ARk@lemm.ee 23 points 2 years ago
[-] De_Narm@lemmy.world 59 points 2 years ago

It's multi-platform, uses one of the biggest IPs of an entire generation and seems to do it quite well too. Everything else would have been more surprising to me.

[-] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 16 points 2 years ago

I'm shocked the online outrage from gamingcirlclejerk didn't work

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] AbsurdityAccelerator@lemmy.world 49 points 2 years ago

I wonder it's because it attracted a bunch of people who weren't into games, but are huge Harry Potter fans.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 61 points 2 years ago

It's also on every platform, including the Switch, while TotK is just on the Switch.

[-] garretble@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago

Yeah this feels like a Look What They Have to Do (release on every system) to Mimic a Fraction of Our Power (be Zelda) meme.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] EssentialCoffee@midwest.social 12 points 2 years ago

Honestly it was just a good game. I saw it attracting both Potterheads and non-Potterheads. (I would not consider myself a Potterhead).

Does it have a bunch of replay value? Not really (neither do a lot of games). But man, that initial playthrough was just really good. It also looks like I clocked 113 hours on the game, so that's a pretty decent return to me.

Also, despite the source material and the author, it had a lot of very inclusive elements, which were a nice touch.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] muse@kbin.social 45 points 2 years ago

Hasnt Nintendo like, not released digital sales for TotK? I remember reading that recently.

Not a cope post, I don't care if you play the terf game, just actually curious.

[-] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 31 points 2 years ago

If you have nothing else to play and want a simple open world game set in and around Hogwarts, it's perfectly servicable as long as you pirate it. Don't expect to be blown away by it though.

[-] BowtiesAreCool@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

I assumed that after literally nobody or any media outlets have talked about it since release. Telltale sign of bang on average game. Probably great for potter fans and boring for those who don’t care or haven’t seen the films/read the books.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] _sideffect@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago
load more comments (9 replies)
[-] Toneswirly@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago

Millions of people have bad taste. Shocker

[-] GilgameshCatBeard@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 years ago

Smug gamer thinks what others like is wrong. Shocker.

[-] ada 16 points 2 years ago

Supporting transphobes is wrong. Millions of people supported a transphobe. For me, that's not being smug, it's being terrified

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[-] AceTKen@lemmy.ca 23 points 2 years ago

Never got into Harry Potter since I was too old. This game was really fun to just explore and I constantly felt a forward momentum. Some of the stories were good, and some were awful.

I would absolutely play a sequel just based on the well done sense of discovery alone. I just wish more of what you found was impactful instead of cosmetic.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] arc@lemm.ee 18 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I thought it was a great game that captured the spirit of the books & movies so well. Thankfully all the mock outrage and virtue signaling didn't affect its sales and probably boosted them.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] MrGerrit@feddit.nl 18 points 2 years ago

Completed both 100% and they're such great fun games.

Hogwarts was awesome to walk through the wizardry world. Battling wizards, poachers, spiders, etc. Finding all the secrets and going through the story. Finished the game in a week, I just couldn't put the controller down.

[-] comrade19@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

Has anyone played both? Im loving zelda at the moment and wouldn't mind moving onto this next

[-] o_oli@lemmy.world 32 points 2 years ago

Hogwarts is fun for about 30 hours roleplaying as a wizard, as a casual potter fan. I got really bored of it after that and never finished the game. At its core it really is very generic, it's really propped up by the IP. That's not to say it's bad by any means but its not got the depth of Zelda.

[-] Voytrekk@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

I think the biggest issue for me was how large the map was. They did the castle and hogsmede very well, but then threw in a bunch of filler content in the other towns. If they had stuck to the more core areas only, the game wouldn't have gotten so stale later on.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] 520@kbin.social 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Zelda is the better game. Problem is (sales wise) the Zelda franchise isn't nearly as popular outside of gaming circles, and access to this game is locked to those that own a Switch, whereas HL is on all platforms

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] LucidBoi@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

I pirated it and played for maybe two hours. It was boring and the controls didn't feel good. Uninstalled shortly after.

[-] Vespair@lemm.ee 16 points 2 years ago

Embarrassing.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2024
346 points (100.0% liked)

Games

41142 readers
1699 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS