1258
Buffed af (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Eccehom@lemmy.world to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] LadyAutumn 108 points 1 year ago

Yikes the anti-feminist takes in this thread lol

Men do not experience body policing in even remotely similar ways to women. If that fact offends you you probably don't actually understand how misogyny functions.

[-] Syrc@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago

The standard of “very good body” is higher for women, sure, but the standard of “good enough body” for women is much, much lower than the one for men.

The first one is useful if you want to be an actor or model, the second if you want to find a partner for life. Guess which of the two is more relevant for the average person.

[-] LadyAutumn 35 points 1 year ago

Your body affects your life in many more ways when you're a woman. My body affects my employment, it affects me whenever I go anywhere in public, it affects my relationships with friends with family and with coworkers. It's open season to make comments about my body, regardless of if I've got a "very good body" or not. Harassment of women is the norm. It's not attached to perceived attractiveness, at least not in that only those deemed very attractive suffer sexual harassment and assault. We all suffer in this, and over a lifetime starting as a literal child it totally dehumanizes you. Being lesser is a woman's place, because all society will ever focus on is our bodies and how they relate to men. We don't even get to be people, just game pieces surrounding men only relevant in whatever use we have to them. Misogyny is a cornerstone of our society itself. It's baked into our politics, our tradition, our history, our legal system, our families, It's everywhere. And thats why comparing the way men and women experience body standards and policing doesn't work. The scale isn't even close to the same, nor is the severity.

[-] Syrc@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

Being lesser is a woman’s place, because all society will ever focus on is our bodies and how they relate to men. We don’t even get to be people, just game pieces surrounding men only relevant in whatever use we have to them.

Ok, now this is just plain overdramatizing. We’re not in the 19th century anymore, on paper women have every right men have in the whole first world, plenty of corporations are built with the main purpose of providing pleasant experiences to women and a lot of women have been in very high positions of power. Women ARE people just as much as men according to the huge majority of people, and those who don’t think so are usually unlikeable by men and women alike.

Misogyny is very much an issue in the modern society because its roots were in misogyny and you don’t change thousands of years in a century, but we’re moving very fast. I can get that your physical appearance can make a difference in whether you get hired in some companies (and if it does, you probably dodged a bullet), but to say that in modern society women “don’t get to be people” is insulting to all the progress humanity has done.

[-] LadyAutumn 23 points 1 year ago

I've lived it myself, listen to women and read the studies and surveys on these things. On paper means nothing, especially when women are unequal in ways the law does not even account for. In my hometown nearly half of all women have been sexually assaulted. I rarely meet a woman who hasn't experienced any sexual harassment or assault, many experience it before they're even adults. Girls and women are still suffering, in many ways things have barely changed at all. Yes we can work jobs now, yes we can vote. But even people who think it's wrong continue to perpetuate misogyny anyway, misogyny exists everywhere in everyone across society. We all get indoctrinated as children into it, and it takes a lot to deconstruct all the propaganda we're fed.

Society has made some progress, but honestly not very much. Women don't even have human rights in the US. In terms of culture, in terms of actual people and their actual beliefs, we have actually changed very little in the last 50 years. People have always hated women and that has not changed as much as you seem to think it has. Again, I'd encourage you to listen to the stories of women when they talk about the way society continues to discriminate against them. I'd encourage you to frequent women's forums online and read what we talk about and what horrifying realities we live in.

load more comments (23 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[-] dottedgreenline@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately there are too many "open-minded" and "open-minded"-adjacent people who have huge blindspots to their own hypocrisy and philosophical paradoxes. I've met so many IRL and net-folk who are lefty "activists" who are huge fucking racists and douchebag misogynists. Extinction Rebellion for example is full of them. I get a bad taste in my mouth whenever I remember certain interactions with them.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Aesthesiaphilia@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago

Dear men: stfu, you are not allowed to have any problems. Get back to your stoicism.

Sincerely, Feminists who claim to care about men.

[-] LadyAutumn 23 points 1 year ago

Nah, men can and do have problems. This post is an example of a man problem. There are people on this post trying to claim that men and women suffer equally in this regard and arguing with people who are pointing out that this is wrong.

Men suffer from toxic body standards and would greatly benefit from body positivity and better representation in media. But men aren't (as an entire class of people) getting harassed as 10 year olds by 40 year old men making comments about their bodies. Men aren't (as an entire class of people) having relatives make open comments about the size of their secondary sex characteristics and their bodies in general. As a class you don't experience this. Some individuals might, I've rarely met women who did not experience body policing from their earliest memories, ive rarely met women who have never experienced sexual harassment. The statistics are crystal clear in this regard.

Again, body positivity and better representation for diverse body types would be great for men too. No one is saying otherwise. Even that isn't enough for women, because institutional misogyny exists at all levels of society and in nearly all people in society. Even well meaning and otherwise progressive people can and are misogynist. Even your family and friends are. Its impossible to simply change one thing. It requires a society wide change in tolerance for bigotry.

load more comments (43 replies)
load more comments (30 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
[-] ZILtoid1991@kbin.social 96 points 1 year ago

These kind representations do cause body image problems in men. Some more conscious toy manufacturers did redesign their action figures to look more like actual body builders, even if that is still not how soldiers and other combatants look like in real life (for the most part at least). Some actors dehydrate themselves for shirtless scenes.

[-] platypus_plumba@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago

They take steroids before filming these movies. It is no secret. You can't achieve that in a few months, that's 100% steroids backed by a team of experts who are giving them the best products in the exact doses they need.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] Dick_Justice@lemmy.world 64 points 1 year ago

And it absolutely slays me when they refer to Chris Pratt as having a "dad bod" lol

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] CoupleOfConcerns@lemmy.nz 61 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's noticable watching old movies and TV that when the sex symbol takes off their shirt they have a well built but normal body. The modern crustacean look is rather bizarre.

[-] Krakatoacoo@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

modern crustacean look

Larry the Lobster?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] pizzatime@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago

this comment section reads like a twitter exchange and it's fucking mind numbing

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] hungryphrog 34 points 1 year ago

The difference is that those men are not objectified. Yes, those bodies are unrealistic indeed, but those beefcake guys are not presented as sex objects who have no other purpose in this world than to please women.

[-] b00m@kbin.social 71 points 1 year ago

I get the feeling that you never hang out with a group of gals on a night out

[-] ruckblack@sh.itjust.works 60 points 1 year ago

Oh yes, Thor is oiled up and shirtless while Natalie Portman ogles him for the entire first movie because... It looks powerful? It represents his stoicism? Definitely not a sexual objectification thing, oh no sir

[-] DudePluto@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Tbf you can be ogled and not objectified. The difference is that Thor absolutely is portrayed as a complex character with his own agency, or subjectivity. The whole movie is about him learning to step out of the role of warmonger and into a more mature, nurturing role of a king. That gives him a lot of subjectivity - the opposite of objectivity

Edit: So to clarify, yes Thor is part of a series of unrealistic body standards for men. But he's not objectified

In social philosophy, objectification is the act of treating a person as an object or a thing. It is part of dehumanization, the act of disavowing the humanity of others. Sexual objectification, the act of treating a person as a mere object of sexual desire, is a subset of objectification,

Emphasis mine. Where in "Thor" is Thor dehumanized? Do the creators of the movie dehumanize him? No, if anything he exhibits more humanity as the movie goes on. Does Jane Foster dehumanize him? No, she's clearly sexually attracted to him and some scenes do focus on his body, but that's not enough to dehumanize someone. He is not a "mere object of sexual desire" because those scenes exist amid an entire movie that treats Thor with respect as a character, including Jane who gets to know him and love him. The only character who dehumanizes him could be Loki but he's clearly portrayed as being wrong

[-] anonono@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Tbf you can be ogled and not objectified

I gotta get me some of that copium, looks like the good stuff.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Guadin@k.fe.derate.me 49 points 1 year ago

You've never watched a romatic movie or chickflick have you?

load more comments (19 replies)
[-] TheDankHold@kbin.social 28 points 1 year ago

If you think they aren’t objectified that’s your own lack of perspective.

[-] Aesthesiaphilia@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago

Reminds me of the "everyone has sinful urges" anti-gay pastors

"Buff men are built for the male gaze"

My guy, I have some news for you

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] archiotterpup@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

Oh my friend, they very much are objectified. Have you never hung around straight women or gay men? Those men are slabs of meat and that's it.

[-] xoniq@sopuli.xyz 22 points 1 year ago

Even guys are objectified if they are pretty enough. Many women do that with movie stars.

[-] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago

The thing is on both sides it's for the male gaze. Women are are objectified for men (look how sexy she is, don't you want this?), and men are objectified for men (look how strong and handsome he is, don't you want to be like him?)

[-] Aesthesiaphilia@kbin.social 35 points 1 year ago

men are objectified for men (look how strong and handsome he is, don't you want to be like him?)

If you think women aren't enjoying the male eye candy, I have some news for you

load more comments (15 replies)
[-] Veltoss@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

This is just blatant sexism.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (31 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] ParsnipWitch@feddit.de 32 points 1 year ago

Why can't you talk about this issue without a side jab at the issues women face?

[-] CorruptBuddha@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 year ago

What side jab? Showing men can face similar issues is a side jab?

Why can't things be compared?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] bblkargonaut@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

Prehensile penis is the unachievable body standard for the dense folk out there

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Naia 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They don't put men like this in movies for women.

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

points at science project that works out 20 hours a day while taking a cocktail of steroids and hormones from a panel of doctors

This is what a normal man should look like.

[-] suarez@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

Wonder what steroids they're using

[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

And don't forget the intentional dehydration for topless scenes. Hugh Jackman has been very open about that.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] gaiussabinus@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

When asked what character i wanted to be, i have always said tentacle monster. The tentacle monster gets all the hot chics.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] insaneinthemembrane@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

All of these are in superhero movies, not exactly a representative sample of male movie bods.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 54 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Except for the fact that basically every leading man who takes his shirt off in 99% of mainstream movies have physiques much closer to this than those of most regular people.

load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2023
1258 points (100.0% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

27184 readers
3793 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS