860
"If those kids could read they would be very upset"
I kind of want to tell him that republicans who don't support trump don't understand their party.
...don't understand the demographics of their party.
It's all about advertising to the racists and to the putin-bots. Trump only is a smelly and horrible means to a very ugly end.
Even before that, it was about protecting the "good" people from the "bad" people. It just has gotten to the point where you no longer get cancelled for racism.
load more comments
(1 replies)
He wants to be in the Party That Cuts Taxes And Bombs Brown People, but not... you know... the Party That Tweets Rudely.
load more comments
(3 replies)
load more comments
(3 replies)
Jesus would not recognize modern Christians by almost any measure.
Imagine if you had a time machine and could pick him up and show him St. Peters basilica today.
The shit fit he would throw would make the cleansing of the temple look like nothing.
(╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━┻
load more comments
(3 replies)
Maybe ask yourself why your people are so stupid in the first place, Adam.
He's just pissy he wasn't chosen as god emperor of the smoothies.
This guy was on the January 6th committee. He appears to be genuine in his disgust of trump, and I doubt he is envious of him.
That being said, he still holds all of the core conservative views that keep us poor and sick.
load more comments
(1 replies)
He’s not wrong, but this is honestly the ‘no true Scotsman’ fallacy.
The bible does technically say you should treat your fellows as you would want to be treated and promotes brotherhood, but it also says women and other races are inferior and advocates for truly heinous behaviour. Cherry picking has always been the point, and shitloads of crimes against humanity have been officially sanctioned by the church.
There’s a very good reason the founders these people claim to venerate wanted the church and state to be separate. They were deists, but not overt Christians, and they’d seen what happens when religion mingles with government: horrible, horrible things.
Matthew 19:24
And again I say unto you, It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.
They have an excuse for that. It's really fucking stupid.
There are two popular interpretations for the phrase “eye of a needle.” The first theory is that it is a reference to the tiny hole at the top of a sewing needle. Simple enough. The second theory is that it is a reference to a gate with the name “the eye of the needle” that was in first century Jerusalem. The gate was so small that anyone that hoped to get a camel through would have to take all of their baggage off the camel, get it down to its knees, and kind of shimmy the camel through the tiny opening.
You can see why this is important for Bible readers. Either Jesus is saying that it is impossible for a rich man to get into Heaven, or he’s saying that it’s really challenging for a rich man to get into heaven.
https://classictheology.org/2021/10/12/through-the-eye-of-an-actual-needle-the-fake-gate-theory/
Of course, there is zero evidence for such a gate ever existing. Rich Christians just want to excuse their wealth.
Even with that questionable excuse it would mean you have to give up all of your possessions and humbly come to god on your knees. They really just want to ignore their own book.
Oh, but they tithe! So they don't need to give up anything else!
Does willing all of your wealth to your children count as giving up your wealth when you die? Cause that seems to be their plan.
load more comments
(1 replies)
It's also stupid because it ignores the part right before the camel metaphor
16Just then a man came up to Jesus and asked, “Teacher, what good thing must I do to get eternal life?”
17“Why do you ask me about what is good?” Jesus replied. “There is only One who is good. If you want to enter life, keep the commandments.”
18“Which ones?” he inquired.
Jesus replied, “ ‘You shall not murder, you shall not commit adultery, you shall not steal, you shall not give false testimony, 19honor your father and mother,’ c and ‘love your neighbor as yourself.’ d ”
20“All these I have kept,” the young man said. “What do I still lack?”
21Jesus answered, “If you want to be perfect, go, sell your possessions and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me.”
22When the young man heard this, he went away sad, because he had great wealth.
23Then Jesus said to his disciples, “Truly I tell you, it is hard for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of heaven. 24Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God.”
It just says sell your possessions and give to the poor.
Most Christians don't really know the Bible very well. They think Paradise Lost or Dante's Inferno are canon. They do all sorts of mental backflips to justify what they want to do anyway.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Good post, thank you for sharing!
load more comments
(3 replies)
*enter into prison
FTFY
He's got an unrealistically high opinion of Christianity.
I've got a high opinion of Christianity and Christians. I have an incredibly low opinion of "Christianity" and "Christians".
I've also heard that no true "Scotsman"....
Edit: no, it's ok guys, I put it in quotes.
It's not a "No True Scotsman" if the definition of being a thing is acting a certain way and you don't do that.
You can tell everyone in the world you're an ultra marathon runner, but if you don't run ultramarathons, you're not an ultramarathons runner.
load more comments
(3 replies)
They're reactionary nationalists; I think they understand their religion just fine.
That's kind of the whole problem with basing one's worldview on magical thinking though: when you have to interpret moral instructions, its only as good as the lens you use. In this case, their religion is filtered through fear, bigotry, and power politics.
I have much more respect for Christians who use humanism as their lens, but they're also picking and choosing what they want to from the Bible Buffet.
load more comments
(1 replies)
There's a question here of scripture vs religion. I think very clearly people who follow Trump do not understand the Christian scripture/Bible.
But scripture isn't what religion is. Religion is the faith system that develops around that scripture, even if it's contradictory at times. In that sense, evangelicals understand their religion perfectly well.
Yeah. Folks don't understand theology and exegesis in religion. The critics of religion are guilty of the same problem the evangelical right: biblical literalism. Literalism is a modern method of interpretation where texts historically read as "mythos" arr now read as "logos".
load more comments
(3 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
If you can believe some old book full of fairy tales is true, then you can believe literally anything.
load more comments
(1 replies)
For a Republican, this is quite a smart analysis.
Kinzinger doesn't understand their religion
Their religion is hate and harm.
That is distinctly different from their scripture, which is the exact opposite of those things. They call themselves “Christian” while spitting in the face of the teachings of the man their “religion” is named after.
load more comments
(2 replies)
“If you are a Christian who supports him you don’t understand your own religion.”
Typical christian gatekeeping. Absolutely nobody is an actual christian, according to any christian. That's why they've fought each other for hundreds of years over the meaning of 'real christian'. Millions of people have been killed over this crap.
"You're not a real christian! My god says to never kill, and I'll kill you if you say otherwise!"
"No! You're not a real christian! My god says to kill anyone not following the true faith!"
fighting noises until someone is dead. - Which would be fine except innocent people are always drawn into these conflicts and killed.
I rather think that Jesus himself would be the gatekeeper here. He's not a Christian because he follows, values, and embodies precisely none of the values Jesus laid out for his followers, nor any tenets of the actual religion. I know that, and I'm an atheist.
By all means, prove me wrong by going through all the things about Trump that Jesus would approve of. We'll all be waiting.
The problem is, and a big part of it (but not all of it) is due to Biblical contradictions and lack of clarity, no one follows everything Jesus says to do.
The Skeptics's Annotated Bible has a huge list of contradictions separated into books.
https://skepticsannotatedbible.com/first/contra2_list.html
For example- Should the gospel be preached to everyone?
Sometimes Jesus says yes, sometimes Jesus says not to gentiles or Samaritans, meaning basically the only people the gospel should be preached to is other Jews.
https://skepticsannotatedbible.com/contra/samaritans.html
How do you follow the teachings of Jesus when they are that inconsistent?
load more comments
(6 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
I'm tired of reading headlines that start with Former.. who gives AF. Please start with "Powerless Retiree Joe Schmo Has Said Some Irrelevant Shit That Makes No Difference"
Okay cool.. so dude on Internet has opinions. So I might as well be a former GOP congressman. Got it
load more comments
(2 replies)
Eh. That's a no true Scotsman fallacy. Also the christian religion has been authoritarian at least since it became the atate religion of the roman empire back ion the 4th century.
At this point that has got to be the ONLY quiet part Republicans don't say out loud.
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2023
860 points (100.0% liked)
politics
19087 readers
3306 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS