207
submitted 1 year ago by StarLuigi to c/main

I personally am quite against it. I joined Lemmy to stay away from the toxicity on Meta's platforms. I don't want any corporate bodies on the fediverse either and possibly doing to the fediverse what Google did to XMPP

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ada 31 points 1 year ago

We have completely blocked and defederated from threads given the uncontrolled transphobia taking place there

[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 68 points 1 year ago

Seems clear to me that Facebook should have no other interest in this other than ultimately making money. Thus it is antithetical to Lemmy and the fediverse in general, and should be treated as such.

[-] fbievan@fedia.io 4 points 1 year ago

Not really, they're businesses that sell fediverse hosting, right?

[-] princessnorah 9 points 1 year ago

While I’m sure that one-click hosting for fediverse instances exist, I’d imagine most instance admins would be using general dedicated server hosting. It would allow for finer control of the backend.

[-] BlueSharkEnjoyer 5 points 1 year ago

My main mastodon uses one of the hosted services, which I'm totally fine with. Moderating a community is hard enough without adding extra sysadmin work on top, and I'm happy to donate towards the running costs whatever way the admins choose is best to run it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Xeelee@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

I don't think they're there to make money. They want to take over the place and then absorb it in other to eliminate competition. Which is what they've always been doing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] surlybaer@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago

Agreeing with the general sentiment. Anytime the big five 'engage' with the open source community they just use and abuse it. IMHO it would be in the best interest of the Fediverse to reject all partnership offers from the corps and make sure to defederate any instances they stand up.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] samsy@feddit.de 31 points 1 year ago

They really think we never learned from google+ or WhatsApp? They implement OpenSource, greedy milk it to the ground and close it or set their propetary code over it. Nothing has changed, we should be worried about activitypub since the greedy five are interested in it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] corytheboyd@kbin.social 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I can already see it. They will offer a solution to the identity “problem”, moving user accounts to their network. They will offer “free” hosting solutions so that more people can run communities without self-hosting. Over the course of years they will slowly inject ads, tracking, the typical enshitificaton fare.

I’m tired.

[-] lusterko@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I doubt it will take them years to inject ads. It's Meta we're talking about

[-] nottheengineer@feddit.de 21 points 1 year ago
[-] The_other_me@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Good read...thanks for the link.

[-] spaduf 18 points 1 year ago
[-] StarLuigi 6 points 1 year ago
[-] Jyrdano@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago

Thank god Kbin allows to block an entire instance. Although I’d prefer if the fediverse collectively defederated from them.

[-] spaduf 17 points 1 year ago

One thing they've started mentioning over on Mastodon is that boosts can probably be legally used to build ad profiles.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Smorty 16 points 1 year ago

Absolutely terrible. No cooperation should force users to creat a proprietary account for using the fediverse. Also meta evil.

[-] missingno@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago

The fact that Threads won't launch in Europe because it's literally illegal there tells me everything I need to know about this platform. Do not trust Facebook, do not federate with Facebook.

[-] Balssh@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

If only US would have sane laws too...

[-] sickpusy@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago

As I said in another post, this oddly reminds me of the XMPP days and how Facebook and Google supported it in the beginning and then dumped it once they had enough users over to their side.

[-] kbity@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Literally my first exposure to Threads as an active web service tells me that even if it weren't a blatant attempt at Embrace-Extend-Extinguish, you do not want to be federated with it. All your "favourites" from Twitter are there.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Retro@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago

I can’t imagine Meta believes in the general ethos of the Fediverse, not for one minute. It’s pretty clear how corporations act to dominate or disrupt anything they perceive as threatening their consolidation over “the market”. If the Fediverse gains real traction that’s going to be a problem for them and they will act accordingly.

[-] Papy@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago

One of the cool things about fediverse is from what I've seen, less toxicity in general. Seeing that most twitter users will use threads is scaring the shit out of me, I definitely don't want crazy people being super toxic for no reason here in the fediverse

[-] funnyjelo@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago
[-] ZILtoid1991@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

A lot of people are using the same user handle accross platforms. That's an easy way to deanonimize people's data, and that's what is Meta aiming for (besides potential EEE tactics).

[-] PaigePalisade 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It honestly annoys me that people are moving to this. Mastodon instances are mostly run by independent nonprofits. Bluesky is at least run by a "public benefit" for profit. But people seem all too willing to move to a site by another big tech company. The only silver lining is that hopefully, I can still follow the people that do use Threads.net on Mastodon/Calckey/whatever which is why I am against complete defederation and only pro-limiting them.

Also, their website is just a bunch of spinning balls, you cannot see posts or do anything besides just watch balls spinning around. Kind of a dealbreaker because I expect more than just spinning balls on my social platforms.

[-] spaduf 6 points 1 year ago

People should note: this is an instance meta community not a place for general discussion outside of lemmy.blahaj.zone

[-] forpeace@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

I don’t want any corporate bodies on the fediverse

Completely agree. We've seen how corporate involvement in social media works, let's leave it behind.

[-] ReepusVanguard 6 points 1 year ago

First it was the metaverse, now it is the fediverse...

[-] ragemidi@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Can't wait for every instance to block it lmao

[-] Artemis@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] tuto193@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

There have been plenty of posts about it, and I can't find the one that better broke down the situation, but it went like this:

  • We don't need Meta and they will be probably just after your data, which is anyway completely public regardless of whether you join threads or not (since the protocols are open, and they can simply look into everything you post here or there). So we might as well not give them data directly by joining their platform.
  • the most our instances can do is to either federate with them, or not. But that's not the only thing, since you will still be seeing their content if your instance federates indirectly with them (through another one, that doesn't block them). This will leave 3 main groups of instances:
  1. Instances that federate with Meta's Threads.
  2. Instances that don't directly federate with Threads
  3. Instances that block threads completely.

[1] and [2] will mostly carry on their merry way while [3] will be super isolated, since [1] and [2] will be the biggest groups.

I can't really recall the bigger arguments that summarise the idea, but it all comes down to:

  • lets show Meta's users that they're welcome in the fediverse, and that they too can leave big corps for a more decentralised community. If we block them, some instances (that are maybe less liked) will instead be the front page of the fediverse for these new users, and that wouldn't probably make a good impression.
  • Meta joining the fediverse voluntarily will be its own demise, since we are not leaving for them, and their users will see that Meta doesn't really bring anything to the table and instead just takes.
[-] cartufer 4 points 1 year ago

Then i think meta trying to connect to the fediverse is more trying to maintain its own users and keep itself relevant. Meta has never showed its users its content in a timely manner and does so to feed ads and sow their own opinion. If meta can say "don't leave for the new thing, we'll bring it here and water it down" then they're not bring facebook content and community to use, they're just aggregating our content into their feeds.

[-] AnonymousLlama@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

It's a double edged sword. I like the idea of activityPub getting more focus so it can be optimized and improved. I hate the idea of getting low quality Facebook style spam. I get that you can block things but I'd rather it just not be there

[-] curiosityLynx@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

I like the idea of activityPub getting more focus so it can be optimized and improved.

Just like Google did with XMPP, most of those improvements will be for Threads/Meta only while making the rest of the fediverse look subpar.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Smorty 5 points 1 year ago

I have seen the word "defederation" thrown around a lot. What would this mean for the average Blåhaj zone user if we defederated?

[-] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

Basically a big brick wall between the two instances. Their posts and users wouldn't show up here. It'd be like they don't exist.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Onii-Chan@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Great. I came here specifically to escape big tech bullshit, and now they're coming to infect the fediverse. At this point, I don't care. Once they get a foot in the door, it's already too late. I'll just leave if I have to, I haven't had any social media in years at this point anyway. I can't envision a world where Meta doesn't use covert tactics to gain a stranglehold over this place.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
207 points (100.0% liked)

Blahaj Lemmy Meta

2310 readers
13 users here now

Blåhaj Lemmy is a Lemmy instance attached to blahaj.zone. This is a group for questions or discussions relevant to either instance.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS