285
submitted 2 years ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/news@lemmy.world
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Jakdracula@lemmy.world 83 points 2 years ago

That’s the republicans plan.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 52 points 2 years ago

Putin's plan, the Republicans are just following orders.

[-] YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH@infosec.pub 17 points 2 years ago

Nah, the republicans have just as much agency as Putin. These fuckers are fascists and fascists love to give aid to other fascists ever since Hitler helped Franco win Spain.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Kalkaline@leminal.space 4 points 2 years ago

You said the quiet part out loud.

[-] PatFussy@lemm.ee 47 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The EU should never let this happen. Europeans love to shit on the US on how much we spend on the military and simultaneously form a queue to get on knees for sucking uncle sam dry when they need defences. Help your neighbors you leeches or fuck off. Dont put this on the US.

[-] Chup@feddit.de 47 points 2 years ago

The European spendings and commitments for Ukraine are higher than US. As it should be.

Here is the tracker: https://www.ifw-kiel.de/topics/war-against-ukraine/ukraine-support-tracker/

[-] PatFussy@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

Good thing this post is how the war can be lost if the US delays funds and not EU.

[-] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 12 points 2 years ago

For years the consensus was that the Europeans would accept US hegemony in exchange for protection. But that's no longer the case. But tell me, what exactly will the US gain from having a more assertive and militarised Europe?

[-] tacosplease@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

It makes SO MUCH sense for the US to spend money here. We spent 5% of our military budget for Ukraine to take out around half of Russia's army. So 5% to kneecap our biggest adversary is too expensive for the Republicans? Conservatives are a fucking cancer.

[-] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 9 points 2 years ago

The Russians aren't an adversary of the Republicans. They're their sponsors.

[-] PatFussy@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

consensus was that EU would accept US hegemony in exchange for protection

Yeah i dont think this was ever true. Even if it was true, why shit on your protection and crying when you need it? The US would gain not having to spend so much on military outposts in the EU/NATO if you guys stopped relying on the US for protection. Increase the taxes on your citizens a bit more to get the military spending you need. This way, the US can finally get some proper healthcare. Everyone wins, right?

[-] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 5 points 2 years ago

Ha ha, you're a funny one. Do you really believe for one second, that any money saved on the military would actually benefit regular people? The US already spend more per head on healthcare than any other country and yet outcomes for normal people are atrocious. Who do you think pockets all that money?

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

It's not military spending in the way of proper healthcare in the US. The current system makes a lot of money for a bunch of people directly and others indirectly and fixing the system would cut off that profit so they are willing to use their wealth to ensure that wealth keeps getting topped up.

[-] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

Room to cut military spending on providing Europe's military defense for it?

[-] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago

Be me, Putin

Man, Fuck NATO, I want a buffer zone between us and them

Idea.gif

I'll just annex some territory and make it a buffer state.

Oh shit, now NATO is closer than ever!

Ohgodohfuck.jpg

What to do?

Idea.gif

I'll just annex some territory and make it a buffer state

[-] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 6 points 2 years ago

Nah, just buy some politicians of your biggest adversary and you're golden. They're cheap. Really cheap.

[-] Getawombatupya@aussie.zone 5 points 2 years ago
[-] Wahots@pawb.social 4 points 2 years ago

Tfw some dickhead politician gets outed for corruption and they say they'll fight the charges and they took like, $200k. Like damn man, why are you so fucking cheap? I thought corruption would only start around the multimillion dollar mark.

If you are gonna be a criminal, at least have some standards.

[-] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Do you know how apathetic I feel when my country gives hundreds of billions to fight this war and most of the people I know can’t afford to live? We work harder than ever, are as productive as ever, get so few days off, only to pay for bombs landing in countries we can’t even pick out on a map.

I want Ukraine to win. I want it badly. Ukraine will ask for more and more money so long as there is war. They will get it. Please don’t delay. So will genocidal Israel. And I will be living with my parents until I’m 30. Uncertain if I can afford healthcare.

I know who to be mad at and I want to feel good supporting just wars. But I go to pay my bills, I stand in line at the grocery store, I turn the heat off in my house, and all I hear are the bombs.

[-] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 21 points 2 years ago

People like you always amaze me. Do you think if we didn't spend billions of dollars for this war then it would be used to help peo0le who can't afford to live? To Republicans, that's worse than aid to Ukraine.

[-] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Friend, I support Ukraine and the aid they’re getting. I don’t support republicans and never will. And I won’t do their work for them here. I don’t know how this got lost and turned into such a political thing, I was just expressing that our money for war is near endless and yet we have unaffordable housing. I want to fund Ukraine AND I want people around me taken care of. All I was pointing out is apathy and I know I’m not alone in that.

[-] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 5 points 2 years ago

I appreachiate that, but the fact is there is a political line of resistance in helping the poor and Ukraine.

[-] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The same people who are making your life miserable also support the guys who start those wars.

[-] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I told you, I know who to be mad at.

[-] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Just like with Israel, the US "gives monetary aid" on the proviso that Ukraine turn around and hand it straight back in exchange for military supplies from US companies. Let's not pretend like the US and its defense industry isn't making out like bandits in this conflict and achieving the most cost effective US foreign policy intervention on Russia to date.

[-] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 6 points 2 years ago

And the US will lose its allies in the EU for now and into the future.

[-] DieguiTux8623@feddit.it 9 points 2 years ago

Really I wouldn't say so. We are literally packed with US military bases all around Europe "just in case".

[-] firewyre@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Look I'm all for being in this to win it. But we can't be the only ones helping.

[-] teegus@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

you're not

Edit: Norway has given 1.6% of gheir GDP in aid, US, 0.3%. So, Norway has given 6-7 times more per capita (as they have a larger gdp per capita). The US is actually way down the list in aid per capita.

[-] firewyre@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Nice, then they shouldn't automatically lose if the US can't get its shit together.

[-] teegus@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago

Depends what happens to european aid.. and even though the EU, together, has given more than the US, that doesn't mean the US is not a significant contributor. I really hope they get their shit together because Ukraine needs all the help they can get.

[-] kGdMKhy8Wa5s@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago

Ukraine was always going to lose. A few choice groups have been getting their pockets lined with cash in the mean time.

[-] wandermind@sopuli.xyz 20 points 2 years ago

What does Ukraine "losing" mean to you at this point of the war?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

*The United States ~~Ukraine~~ could lose the war if the U.S. delays military aid, top Ukrainian official says

[-] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 22 points 2 years ago

TIL the United States shares a border with Russia.

[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 years ago

I mean almost, but you aren't exactly going to be invading across there.

Us Russia boarder

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MisterD@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 years ago

Look at a map of countries that are part of NATO in Europe

Russia is not going to stop at Ukraine:

  • Next country will be a NATO country.
  • When that happens, that country will invoke Article 5
  • Next step WW3
[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Wouldn't Moldova be a likely next candidate?

Moldova is ready to blow up their own airstrip they are worried it'd be used against them.

[-] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago

I bet they're very much regretting their own constitution right now. Neutrality is great when you're surrounded by people who mean you no harm, but when the playground bully is 50 times your size, it's not going to help much.

this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2023
285 points (100.0% liked)

News

30945 readers
2215 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS