1048
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] PyroNeurosis 172 points 4 days ago

You could also play with camera angles, but dimensionally, yeah, no substitute for a big dude.

[-] k0e3@lemmy.ca 84 points 4 days ago

Or a little dude to make a normal dude look big like in LotR.

[-] galacticbackhoe@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago

I thought a lot of their work was camera tricks. Jonathan Rhys-Davies was 6'3.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago

They used every trick out there at some point. They even invented a new technique for 2 shots in Bag End where they had motion-controlled cameras, tables, and benches synched up so they could do the only ever forced-perspective shots with moving cameras ever really used.

Everything since then went digital in the following years, the technique was never really used again.

In the Hobbit films, they had to lean more into digital because they were in 3D, so forced perspective shots wouldn't work.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 26 points 4 days ago

See: Hagrid's behind-the-scenes.

[-] negativenull@piefed.world 8 points 4 days ago

And Lord Of The Rings in Bilbo's house

[-] EggInDisguise 11 points 4 days ago

Honestly seeing the camera shift in a MAKING OF clip for some of the angles made my brain work overtime, because when watching the movie so many times over the years, my brain just goes "yeah, hobbit next to man riding on a wagon" or "hobbit and man at a table across from each other" but then you see them from a different angle and it's just... Wrong.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] lobut@lemmy.ca 19 points 4 days ago

VFX artists react look at these things all the time:

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Wf8NgICk3ng

Some really cool 90s tricks with forced perspective.

[-] GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

This is one of the reasons why I love love love cinema history. The lengths that the crew and creative team went to in order to make an illusion work is just mind-boggling. One of my favorite things to do as a kid was watch the DVD extras about Lord of the Rings, Star Wars, Labyrinth, all that.

One of my favorite forced perspective tricks ever was Darby O'Gill and the Little People. That old Irishman playing a fiddle above a cavern full of leprechauns, galloping around a pile of ancient treasure on tiny horses, and then rushing off to hunt foxes through a magical crack in the wall?

Literally, one of the most incredible feats of practical film illusion ever concocted, right up there with the velociraptors of Jurassic Park and the chest-burster from Alien.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] monotremata@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 days ago

I sort of think everyone should have a chance to play with an Ames Room at least once in their life.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 67 points 4 days ago

Now is where someone better at storytelling than me would talk about the time Andre the Giant drunkenly passed out in a hotel lobby and nobody could move him so they just left him there.

[-] GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world 67 points 4 days ago

Andre had a lot of joint problems related to his gigantism, as well as physical injuries from his wrestling career. He self-medicated with alcohol, and became addicted to it.

It was really sad.

[-] valkyre09@lemmy.world 54 points 4 days ago

Hello sir, yes hi. I came for an amusing anecdote, but instead I was shown nothing but sadness and pity. I’d like a refund please.

[-] ContriteErudite@lemmy.world 36 points 4 days ago

I'm sorry I am not authorized to give refunds, but I hope that the following Andre the Giant facts will help: he was widely known as the "Gentle Giant" because his real-life personality was exceptionally kind, friendly, and generous. He was soft-spoken and gentle around children, lifting them up and being patient so they wouldn't be scared. He disliked arrogance and mean-spirited people, and would physically "reprimand" bully coworkers in the ring.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] MutantTailThing@lemmy.world 57 points 4 days ago

To be fair, André was one especially Big McLargehuge beefy specimen of mountainous manmeat.

[-] nocturne@slrpnk.net 67 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Mandy (Inigo) is 6 foot (1.83m), Wallace (Vizzini) is 5 foot 2 inches (1.57m)

[-] West_of_West@piefed.social 27 points 4 days ago

I never realized Inigo was himself tall. Wild

[-] grue@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

6 ft is only a little bit above average.

[-] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 20 points 4 days ago

If 6 inches is ‘a little bit’ then sure.

[-] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 12 points 4 days ago

Hey! 6” is above average.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] chunk6235@piefed.social 9 points 4 days ago

"Western" nations average 5'9" to 6', so yeah, Mandy (Inego) is about average height, like 2.5" taller than average for Spanish people.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

He was billed at 7'4, but was really around 7'0-7'1. Same height as Shaq.

[-] Blibly@lemmy.world 57 points 4 days ago
[-] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 72 points 4 days ago

How does his parents knew he was going to be giant as a baby? Or it was just luck that he was named Andre the Giant, and grew up to be giant?

[-] shittydwarf@piefed.ca 51 points 4 days ago

Manifest destiny, you name a kid "the Giant" and they'll grow

[-] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 38 points 4 days ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ParadeGrotesque@lemmy.wtf 7 points 4 days ago

He was enormous at birth, if I remember correctly.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Michal@programming.dev 17 points 3 days ago

Not cooked, they just don't know.

[-] FavouriteShapes@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago

I'm pretty sure I also wondered "holy crap is that guy really that big?" When I watched it

[-] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 3 days ago

I feel like the right thing to do is show them a movie from the early to mid 80s that used early CG and then show them Legend from 1985 point at Darkness and be like "That's a dude in a suit. 5 and a half hours of makeup every day for him to look like that." Then pull out Clue and point at Wadsworth and be like "This is the same dude."

Then get a mop because you have to clean up after their heads explode.

[-] vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 4 days ago

The irony is that he's actually not that tall. It was practical effects. Not digital.

[-] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 5 points 3 days ago

Forced perspective is how they made the hobbits look so small in LOTR.

[-] GraniteM@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago

I still struggle with how animators in 1937 were able animate the ripples in the water in Snow White at about 1:36.

[-] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

They did it by hand. Frame by frame.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] edg@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

I remember watching Snow White as a kid and wtf'ing at those ripples.

[-] GladiusB@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

You could project it on a white background, put a piece of glass in between the projection and the camera. Put some water and create a ripple.

[-] whereitsat@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 days ago

i don't remember ever questioning his size. WWF and arnold were so popular that it was normal to see huge, roided out dudes in pop culture.

andre the giant was just slightly bigger.

[-] Boost@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

Arnold is 6'2" and was ~250 pounds in his peak body building days. Andre was 7'4" and ~500 pounds. There were lots of huge dudes at the time but Andre really was kind of in a league of his own.

[-] Lumidaub@feddit.org 23 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Why would they ask "how" they made him big? Wouldn't they simply assume the usual CGI or forced perspective? (I'm assuming here dad has sat them through all 286 hours of Lord of the Rings Making Ofs)

Edit: ah. see below.

[-] Secret_Music@piefed.blahaj.zone 19 points 4 days ago

I mean, it is a movie from the 1900s, so how did they do it?

[-] Lumidaub@feddit.org 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Oh you mean the question isn't just "how did they do that" but rather "how did they do that, that's impossible without CGI (which is a modern thing)". That... makes sense.

Edit: since this is apparently not entirely clear: everything inside quotation marks is a hypothetical quote, including everything inside parentheses.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 21 points 4 days ago

I mean, they might be cooked but that seems like a reasonable question for a kid who doesn't know all the tricks and hasn't seen it before. This feels like "I'm going to bash the youth because I'm old" boomer humor

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Sidyctism2@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 3 days ago

Does twitter-op not know about practical effects? I never watched the movie, but im gonna guess stuff like low filming angles, stools, plateau-shoes existed back then

[-] FavouriteShapes@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago

The biggest dude of all. A giant!

[-] bitteroldcoot@piefed.social 10 points 4 days ago

I ran across a study a while back how social media is causing brain damage in kids.

AI, social media and internet is becoming the lead poisoning of this generation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] joyjoy@piefed.social 7 points 4 days ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The Wizard of Speed and Time is a very interesting 2026 movie when you realize it was made in 1988 (or 1979, depending on which part) without computer animation. Someome asked how he filmed the train sequence, where he outran a train. His answer? "I just ran faster than the train was moving"

[-] raman_klogius@ani.social 8 points 4 days ago

Today with Robert Bobroczkyi. What an absolute unit. Singular. Unique.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 days ago

Still happening today. Backrooms did some numbers this year on a low budget, and relied on a 7'7"/2.3 m actor (with prosthetics and makeup) for one of the freakier looking characters in recent film.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2026
1048 points (100.0% liked)

People Twitter

10352 readers
297 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major celebrity, figure or any politician. If you replace the "x" at their site with xcancel (so it beomes xcancel.com), and you're not on mobile, it will save video. https://web.archive.org/save is another great option. Archive.is is no longer recommended because they remove/alter content.
  7. If a tweet (or similar) makes a statement of fact, either mark it as "satire" in the body or provide the original source link backing up the statement

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS