183
submitted 11 hours ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Meta says safeguards are in place to prevent surreptitious filming, but some UK venues now prohibit them from being worn at all

When Meta used superstar Kylie Jenner to promote its sleek new line of “spy glasses”, the social media company hoped the devices would reach the same broad acceptance that tablets and smartwatches have found before them.

But those plans have hit a snag in the UK, where venues from elite restaurants to popular pub chains have banned the £359 glasses in order to preserve the privacy of customers and staff.

Celebrated restaurateur Jeremy King, owner of London venues including Simpsons in the Strand, Arlington and The Park, said guests should not wear the recording glasses.

He told the Guardian: “I would never knowingly allow any invasion of guest privacy other than with the eyes we were born with.”

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 hours ago

Kinda funny hearing that from one of the most surveilled countries in the world. Hopefully this grows to be an outright rebuke of all forms of government surveillance they have to endure too.

[-] dsilverz@catodon.rocks 1 points 4 hours ago

I expect these restaurants, pubs and theatres to have no CCTV, either, otherwise it'd quite a hypocritical take if they prohibited non-consensual surveillance glasses while keeping non-consensual surveillance cameras. The same way I feel unsafe before someone wearing Duckerberg's glasses, I also feel unsafe before a surveillance camera whose footage Goddess-knows-who is getting access to (not to mention how most "modern" CCTV feeds their images to AI; wonder why most AI video generators get to generate, e.g., "doorbell camera footage" so easily?).

Also, IMHO, the prohibition on Meta glasses should be targeting the manufacturers (corporations such as Meta, but also Google and other companies developing similar aberrations) instead of just the users. Because, when users are the only ones to blame, society risks missing the forest for the trees, as the corps behind these aberrations would be left unbothered enough for them to work on "thinner frames for smartglasses" which would further pave the way for people like me, who have to wear high-myopia prescription glasses, to be lynched for my thin-framed dumbglasses just because human society would be so blinded by their (understandable) rage that they'd be judging me for the pair of glasses in front of my eyes I got no choice but to wear to live in said society (if I had to remove my prescription glasses in order to be allowed in, I wouldn't be able to watch your theatre play or getting to read your damn beverage menu, for example).

!news@lemmy.world

[-] SnotFlickerman 22 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

I would think theaters would have banned these instantly to prevent movie piracy. The fact that they haven't really shows how thoughtless they are regarding how piracy actually happens.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

You are wildly overestimating how much battery life those things have.

[-] ShredderFeeder@shredderfood.net 3 points 8 hours ago

Most of the cam copies I've seen are trash, I'm pretty sure they're not worried about cams as much as they are guys with tripods in the projection room (where most of the "good" cam copies come from.)

[-] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 3 points 8 hours ago

Even a trash cam produced today is usually miles ahead of what we were getting 15-20 years ago

[-] ShredderFeeder@shredderfood.net 1 points 1 hour ago

Yeah, but holding it steady is the key to a decent cam, and sound is never as good.

Spyglasses wouldn't do it, people move too much.

[-] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 1 points 9 hours ago

They don't care. Media piracy doesn't actually hurt them. The people that care about media piracy are basically the patent trolls of the media world who buy up blocks of music and video and collect royalties.

[-] PetteriPano@lemmy.world 13 points 10 hours ago

Meta's "spy glasses"?

Are they talking about pervert glasses?

[-] Zahille7@lemmy.world 20 points 11 hours ago

Too bad this is only in the UK (so far)

[-] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 8 points 10 hours ago

While I'm not surprised, I think this is yet another showing that the Jenner's really will exploit any and all good will they have for money

[-] Davel23@fedia.io 4 points 10 hours ago

Was that ever in question?

[-] magnetosphere@fedia.io 4 points 10 hours ago

“…and if someone covers or damages the LED, the camera is disabled.”

How does this work? How reliable is it?

[-] SnotFlickerman 12 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Not very reliable at all since there is a huge second-hand market for removing the LEDs so you can film surreptitiously without being clocked as recording.

It seems like there are people who make good money "fixing" these to disable the LED.

[-] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 7 points 9 hours ago

Isn't the entire POINT of these to record people without their knowledge or consent? If they couldn't be disabled they wouldn't be able to sell them.

[-] Malyca@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 hours ago

Good on them for standing up for their clientele.

this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2026
183 points (100.0% liked)

News

38680 readers
2081 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS