I'm curious about the opposite statistic now. Presumably, the number of people eaten by chickens wasn't and isn't zero.
I’m doing my best, but I wasn’t alive in 1961.
Then you're eating infinitely more Chicken than you were in 1961. Keep up the good work.
Of course we are, beef has become unaffordable to the masses.
Beef was not cheap in 1961. At least, not for most people. The American everything-with-meat diet started basically as conspicuous consumption, because living on gruel and forage (mostly in the old country, but also the Depression) was in living memory.
This stat probably reflects that most of the world isn't on the edge of starvation anymore, like it was in 1961. (Now it's just a notable minority)
I wonder how much of it might also have been to deliberately show off American wealth compared to communist countries during the cold war. Like the whole comparisons of having shelves of different brands of the same food.
Chicken is literally a quarter of the price of beef, of course people are eating more chicken. Just a reminder meatloaf, which would now cost at least $15 to feed a family of four, used to be one of the cheapest meals. And outside the anglosphere more people are able to afford meat at all, and chicken and pork are the meats of choice for the world because of their incredibly low cost and relatively low environmental impact; modern cooking techniques and knowledge also pretty much entirely eliminates the risk of food-born illness from historically famously risky sources.
Chickens can also be raised with very little land and just some basic resources. Cows need large amounts of pasture, barns, special equipment, etc.
It isn't that surprising. Humans have gotten very good at raising chickens in the past 60 years.
I saw videos of chickens from the 1900s. My word. They were a fraction of the size today.
Huh, I'm eating less meat than I ever have. Shit's expensive plus stuff like garbanzo beans are surprisingly tasty and protein packed. Plus, it's way healthier for you.
For me, when I had no money, it was pulses (garbanzos and lentils, mainly), brown rice and fish. I lived in a town with a fishing port, and back then everyone was barely getting by, so prices weren't bad. But those same sand dabs I used to buy off the boat, cleaned, 4 for a dollar, are nowhere near as cheap now. And there is no fishing fleet there anymore, it's become a yacht marina.
Anyway I've moved on and am living in another country. Here, the low-food-mile, low-cost options are different. And my consumption of red meat is on the order of once a week. I'm not a big fan of chicken, but still have fish when I'm motivated to visit the fishmonger.
Black beans and rice is a good combo, complimentary proteins too!
I think you have to combine it with other foods to get a complete protein.
Pulses plus grains give you the right set of amino acids to make proteins.
Yes, and some meat is necessary to obtain vitamin B12.
why eat animals that have been fed b12 supplements when you can just take the b12 supplements yourself?
I can safely say this is an underestimation. I ate exactly 0 (zero) chickens in 1961 on account of not having been conceived yet. I eat more than 6 * 0 chickens now.
not only is chicken cheaper, it's healthier. so maybe that also has something to do with it?
i hope as humanity advances, it would be nice to see technological advances in meat alternatives rather than farming chickens. i love eating meat, but damn is it inhumane and inefficient
Also the rise of all the chicken sandwich shops. I imagine their waste is is considered “consumption”, too.
It's just Chickens Georg who eats 10,000 chickens daily and offsets the average for everyone.
Perhaps, eating insects might be a solution.
Maybe stop eating animals?
Eating some meat is required to get vitamin B12.
Nope. The animals geht b12 supplements too, why not direct for us then.
Which is probably why insectivory hasn't caught on. If the West could adapt to sushi it could adapt to mopane worms, but in the 80's or whatever vegetarianism was still a joke. Now it's influential.
A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/