It might make sense for industrial applications, where they can use it to tell if something has gone off before shipping it out, or having someone sniff all the food.
The experience does help when it's ambiguous, since you can tell that it shouldn't be like that before it gets to a point where you retch.
Plus it also helps you tell when your sense of smell is throwing a false positive. For me personally, I'd be more likely to lean on my cooking experience, since my hardwiring would automatically file all raw meat, including fresh from the butcher, as being off.
You basically see it with some sites now, where you're just told "use chrome if you have any issues", and then it reflects badly on firefox, because a casual user might just think it's the fault of the browser that it's poorly made and doesn't work properly.
For the websites, it's not worth writing around browser-specific quirks, when the vast majority use a chrome-based browser.
None. NASA can probably afford to contract one of the many super-geniuses for their engineering services to get a launch vehicle out in no time flat. Wayne Enterprises and LexCorp are engineering powerhouses, it wouldn't be surprising if they already had some prototypes done up already.
Are people deleting because of karma?
At least from my time on Reddit, when people deleted something, it's because they didn't want the post to come back and bite them a while because of others seeing it after the fact, or they just regularly scrubbed the account for privacy reasons, rather than anything to do with actual karma.
The predominant attitude in software development for a while also took user hardware for granted.
You didn't need to optimise for memory and CPU usage, because computers are so powerful now, and memory was plentiful that it wasn't anything you needed to concern yourself with, except in the extreme case.
Whereas in 1993, you were much more constrained, so had to squeeze things in to make it run well, or at all.
It's also a lot easier to use. You don't need to type a password, since it basically exists as a file.
This is why the pyrotechnics have been getting progressively more extreme, to compensate for the ships getting darker. All the energy not used for lighting has to go somewhere.
Very unlikely. In medication trials, it's usually comparing the new medication against the known existing treatment. No medication is both not considered ethical, and wouldn't tell you very much, because what you're testing for is whether the new medication is better than the existing treatments, not whether it works to begin with. You have to show that it does to justify doing the study in the first place. Ethics regulators would not permit you to prevent people from getting any treatment in a study.
The sad thing is that medication just doesn't work sometimes, especially for something as variable as cancer. That's the other side of joining an advanced program. Sometimes, it turns out that the treatment isn't effective for some kinds of cancer, or for some people. If it was perfect, and passed that stage, it would be the normal treatment, not a trial.
I don't understand the point of sending the original e-mail. Okay, you want to thank the person who helped invent UTF-8, I get that much, but why would anyone feel appreciated in getting an e-mail written solely/mostly by a computer?
It's like sending a touching birthday card to your friends, but instead of writing something, you just bought a stamp with a feel-good sentence on it, and plonked that on.
The parallels between Musk and Stark seemed perfect on paper. Both are billionaire tech innovators with a flair for the dramatic and dreams of changing the world.
They're not, though. Stark is a rare engineering powerhouse who personally pushed past a lot of engineering boundaries, and Musk is an investor/programmer who mostly puts his name on existing things.
I might change my mind if Musk personally invents AGI, nanobots, and a previously-unknown clean energy source capable of powering a 1/3rd of NYC with a room no larger than a foyer, like Stark did, but I'm not holding out much by way of hopes.
At the very least, he was seen as the face of the Wolf 359 massacre, and wasn't seen in a good light because of it. A lot of Starfleet outright hate him, and we saw concerns being floated that he was compromised by the Borg now, and might betray Starfleet for them, hence his being kept out of the battle in First Contact.