432
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 2 points 41 minutes ago

From about a year ago. Huh, me thinks he has been to his island and/or ranch:

“If any of you cared about the victims, you wouldn’t drag these women who are in childbearing years now, some of them now having children, back into the limelight, back into the same story, to expose them again to this hideous outcome,” O’Leary said Tuesday. “These guys, they don’t want you to help them anymore.”

https://www.thedailybeast.com/maga-shark-tank-star-kevin-oleary-sparks-fury-with-claim-about-childbearing-epstein-victims/

[-] DisasterTransport@startrek.website 2 points 53 minutes ago* (last edited 7 minutes ago)

Okay 🪄. Everyone who makes under 70k will never eat out again.

This eliminates more than half of the customer base of the restaurant industry, most of which promptly implodes. Millions lose their jobs. What's worse is that all that restaurant spending gets redirected towards grocery stores. Grocery stores move far more product with just a fraction of the workers and they will be damned before they hand out raises to share their new windfall profits. This drastically reduces the velocity of money in the economy and drags us into a sudden contraction.

The storefronts those restaurants occupied, the ones that used to be central meeting points for their communities, become urban blight. Those workers, too, stop being able to pay rent or buy much of anything else, which deals a collateral blow to residential real estate and every business that makes consumer goods. The collapse of the restaurant industry and the sudden blow to landlords of all varieties takes a large tax base with it, and state and local governments that rely on sales and property tax see an immediate budgetary shortfall.

These so-called titans of industry cannot see, will never see, that the "wasteful" and "unthrifty" spending they hate is utterly vital. Their distaste for the poors experiencing such luxuries as participating in simple consumption blinds them to the fact that that spending is the economy.


ETA: Instead of the rest of us tightening our belts even more, the wealthy need to spend a lot more. Fund a literacy program, hand a million dollars to a small electric car conversion company, drop a cool 10 million on urban infill, fuck, build a pyramid. Anything is better than sitting on your wealth doing nothing but chasing rent-seeking enterprises like stock buybacks and cloud infra.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 2 points 58 minutes ago

“…and I’m rich because I make these suckers pay $28 foe lunch.” - Rich CEO.

[-] CyLith@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I mean.... if you spend $28 everyday on lunch, that's $7000 a year, or 10% of your gross income if you make $70k, which is actually a huge amount of money to spend on lunch.

[-] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

I think the numbers here are rhetorical.

[-] ravelin@slrpnk.net 22 points 3 hours ago

And whose fault is it that lunch costs $28????????

[-] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 37 points 4 hours ago

Avocado toast all over again. They do this to every generation.

[-] yyyesss@lemmy.world 12 points 3 hours ago

yep, same script - "it's your fault and you should feel ashamed."

[-] pirate2377@lemmy.zip 16 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Bruh, I wish I made $70,000/yr. It was what I went to college for after all only for the entire world to change after 4 years, now I can't afford myself and in debt.

Regardless, this is ignoring the fact that inflation has increased the cost of groceries in general, not just lunch. Even though Trump ran on it, apparently inflation never actually happened now that he's in office. The collective amnesia from the right when it benefits them is just infuriating

[-] billwashere@lemmy.world 12 points 4 hours ago

Last time I went to a food truck by my office a very basic lunch was $22. And that was before the machine assumed you should tip 18%.

[-] crypt0cler1c@infosec.pub 3 points 1 hour ago

Bro, why aren't you even meal prepping rice and beans for lunch every day, bro? Eat your porridge peasant.

[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 hours ago

Yeah did he say this recently because this is just how much lunch costs now. I'm not happy about it and in the US the tipping culture is more out of hand than ever before but this is largely because employers aren't paying fair wages. We are all basically just helping each other out, but this is just shuffling money at the bottom of the pyramid while the top pays even less.

[-] NickwithaC@lemmy.world 23 points 4 hours ago

Hands up who isn't making anywhere near 70k.

[-] Drusas@fedia.io 6 points 2 hours ago

I wasn't for most of my life until I finally was and then I became disabled shortly thereafter, prompting the government to decide that I should live on sub-poverty wages which aren't enough to feed myself because it's easier and cheaper for them if I just die.

[-] Danarchy@lemmy.nz 5 points 3 hours ago

Cocaine O’Leary w/ his cocaine ideas again

[-] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 53 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

When he was a junior asshole, that $28 meal would cost $9.

I personally think food inflation has rather exceeded the median rate so it’s probably even less than that; my lived experience says that in 2019 I could get a meal for $15-20 and now it’s $25-30, but the inflation calculator disagrees.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 22 points 5 hours ago

It's wild that these elites are shitting on people spending $27 on a meal...

It's not 2017, that doesn't buy you much of a meal.

The cheapest food in my town I can think of is still a solid $8-9. And that is for a very unappetizing sandwich. A small upgrade to a chain "Jersey Mike's Sub" puts you back $11.15 before tax - no drink, no chips.

[-] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

My work recently treated my group of coworkers to subs, but I don't eat meat and didn't have any. Instead, my manager said she'd reimburse me, and broke down the price of the sandwiches (which everyone else split) to calculate $7 per person. So I was given $7 Doordash credit.

$7. On Doordash. The fuck am I supposed to do with that?

[-] Drusas@fedia.io 4 points 2 hours ago

Around me, the only meal you can get for under $10 is banh mi. I'm very grateful for those reasonable prices, but I'm also not exaggerating.

[-] emeralddawn45@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago

I guess because you use the word 'town' that a shitty chain sub might actually be a true upgrade, but for anyone in even a smallish city, look around for little hole in the wall independent restaurants because I guarantee you can get much better food for much cheaper than the shit you'll get at chain restaurants. Off the top of my head I can think of at least 5 sub shops and delis in my area that will give you a much bigger better sandwich than subway, for a little over half the price. Then there's shawarma shops, Chinese take ours that will fill up the take out container so full that it's too much to eat in a sitting, burger places where you can sit down and have a burger and a beer for the price of a McDonald's meal and it'll be twice the size, pizza joints with walk in specials where you can get a small pizza for the price of a slice at pizza-pizza, Caribbean restaurants where there isn't even a fast food alternative, fucking lots of places. Don't settle for some bullshit just because it's familiar.

[-] FoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works 20 points 5 hours ago

lets just fucking kill him

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AlphaOmega@lemmy.world 15 points 5 hours ago

Why is he wearing 2 watches?

[-] mbp@slrpnk.net 7 points 4 hours ago
[-] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)
[-] you_are_dust@lemmy.world 90 points 8 hours ago

$70,000 is a lot more than the median individual income. You can probably afford to spend a bit on lunch if you're single and making that amount.

[-] Eat_Your_Paisley@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago

First if you want to spend $28 on lunch do it just to spite big Kev.

I'm single and make about twice that figure and there is zero chance I would spend $28 on lunch let alone on any kind of recurring basis. People just need to do the little things that make them happy, if thats eating out do it.

[-] Dnb@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 hours ago

$28 is like two sushi rolls or two of anything really.... hell soda costs $3+ and a burger $15ish

It's not that hard to spend a lot eating out even for lunch, it's crazy. Prices have at least doubled in the last few years since covid. Companies are making up for their lost months of profits from shutdown and terrible republican admins fucking up everything and killing regulations and any safeguards or anything consumer friendly. 80% beef costs twice what 95% used to years ago and it's not stocked anymore

[-] Eat_Your_Paisley@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

For me the issue is for a five day work week it's $540 a month, and that's say a downpipe for my car, for me thats more important.

We're all grown ups so spend your money where you think it will improve your life. When I was Gen Z's age I spent more than I should on car stuff because cars are my thing.

[-] DokPsy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

Obviously, if you're poor, you don't deserve any scrap of comfort because it's a moral failing on your part and definitely not a top down systemic problem that caused it /s

[-] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 17 points 6 hours ago

It depends where you live. 70k in a big city area barely covers rent on a studio apartment.

[-] Bad_Engineering@fedia.io 25 points 6 hours ago

He's right, people should stop spending $28 on lunch and just eat the rich instead.

[-] paper_moon@lemmy.world 8 points 6 hours ago

Well, these same assholes then turn around and blame people when they stop spending money on shit like this, as it starts to affect their profits.

"Millenials are killing the food industry!!!"

Look at all the judgement that gets cast in the media for gen Z for not drinking alcohol as much as every other generation.

[-] Bad_Engineering@fedia.io 1 points 7 minutes ago

All the more reason to eat the rich instead.

[-] OwOarchist@pawb.social 64 points 8 hours ago

Stupid indeed.

Instead of paying $28 for lunch, they should just eat the rich.

[-] ignotum@lemmy.world 14 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)
[-] adarza@lemmy.ca 17 points 8 hours ago

when you toss 'em on the grill, watch out for flare-ups. lots of fat, not a lot of meat.

[-] BigTuffAl@lemmy.zip 12 points 6 hours ago

we should eat him for lunch and see what that costs

[-] Drusas@fedia.io 2 points 2 hours ago

He's pretty gross, but I think we could make it turn out well enough if we stew him with some herbs and veggies.

[-] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 53 points 8 hours ago

You got two watches on homie

[-] OwOarchist@pawb.social 16 points 8 hours ago

And each of them probably costs well into the 6-figure range.

[-] sydd@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

How do we go about starting a political party whose main tenet is dining upon the wealthy?

[-] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 hours ago

Is this an American thing, $28 for lunch doesn’t sound that outrageous today as a Canadian (it’s like $20 USD)

[-] Drusas@fedia.io 2 points 2 hours ago

Until very recently, a typical lunch wasn't more than $15.

[-] Takeshidude@lemmy.world 18 points 7 hours ago

Fuck, I wish I was making 70k a year how do I live in this fantasy world?

[-] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 8 points 6 hours ago

Do what I do: work multiple jobs and then lie about your income.

[-] ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com 27 points 8 hours ago

Detached from reality old dude strikes again. It's easy enough for a single meal at a fast food drive through to be $15 these days.

[-] kevinsky@feddit.nl 10 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

People that can impulse buy outragiously expensive watches and cars shouldn't be lecturing the plebs on what to splurge on.

Especially not food. Food is one of last big joys of life for the commoners. Any splurge here is entirely valid.

These people need to stop getting platformed. If you're in such a position, please just enjoy your privilege in silence and leave us the fuck alone.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2026
432 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

11910 readers
2046 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS