The problem is that the pretense doesn't even have to actually have any basis in reality
But they're speaking of their wife in the future tense as it'll be a future event. That's the point and why she'd find it disrespectful
You misunderstand. Their wife is still alive so Everything is still "before she died"
As an amateur astrophotographer with a backyard that looks like this, it is not as peaceful as you experience
It's usually more subtle
I'm not sold that they're not already doing that what with his recent "they have drugs to bring the dead back to life"
Lucky for us in this specific instance, he isn't beholden to ethics
This one right here officer
It's less needing instruction and more a humiliation or submissive kink, from what I've seen. Not my thing but whatever floats their goat
You're right. There is no way that this doesn't end with Innocents getting caught in the crossfire. Ignoring all the Innocents that have already been caught in the crossfire of this and related political pissing contests or bullying
If memory serves, people tend to get overthrowy when their "leaders" allow them to get hungry. Not saying it's a good thing for people to starve, just saying that something will have to give if we are to do better than the status quo. The obvious downsides of this whole thing that numerous people loudly pointed out before (and still pointing it out) Trump started his stupid power grab including the straight are just coming true and at some point there stranglehold he and his ilk have on the people will break
The CEO of one of my companies clients literally said they couldn't do their job without Claude when we told him his PC was slowing down to the point of being unusable due to the desktop app and suggested he not use it