452
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 150 points 1 week ago

There are four Republicans more reliable than this Democrat.

[-] JTT@feddit.org 67 points 1 week ago

Let me guess....he voted not to limit his war powers?

[-] SailorFuzz@lemmy.world 85 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

correct

cast the deciding vote against the latest effort to limit President Donald Trump’s ability to attack Iran

Parties (and/or the people) really need a way to recall member that runs on bad faith and switches after elections. From Sinema to Fetterman, there's always at least one fraud in the DNC.

[-] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 36 points 1 week ago

The DNC always have a "bad democrat" that jump lines while letting all the other mainline democrats vote in

[-] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Lieberman retired so we had to have someone to take his place.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

They work it out, so they only lose the vote by 1, but if more were needed to lose, they would lose those by 1, while the rest pretend to be against it.

[-] Soulphite@reddthat.com 31 points 1 week ago

Duh. Fetterman is a MAGA dempublican ... nearly republican. Hell he practically might be full blown MAGA republican soon enough. He got the TDS now. Brain damage done him in.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

This is the guy voting to allow the war to persist:

https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=zDDEYk9kn-Y

[-] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

Why are you guessing? The headline says that already.

[-] KurtVonnegut@mander.xyz 55 points 1 week ago
[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 week ago

My conspiracy theory is he is paid to be the sacrificial lamb, if it weren't him it would be someone else. I am more angry at Schumer and then the rest of the Democrats for letting Schumer lead.

[-] iocase@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah this is a well known tactic in the US government. Backdoor dealings outline how to make a split vote and pick a fall guy to protect the party's image.

I.e. the Democrats failing to stop Trump's war in Iran a few weeks ago where some random nobody was the fall guy that time. It looks like Democrats tried but failed and they can blame it on some inconsequential Rando who isn't up for reelection

The military industrial complex owns everything. The machine exists for their benefit.

[-] fox2263@lemmy.world 55 points 1 week ago

Republican Senator John Fetterman

[-] santa@sh.itjust.works 40 points 1 week ago

He’s GOP. Let’s drop the DINO nonsense. Refer to him as a Republican.

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.cafe 16 points 1 week ago

There are no Republicans anymore, that was just their larval stage before they morphed into their final form - MAGA. Republicans should only be referred to in an historical or scholarly context.

The Republican party is as dead as the Whigs. They're all MAGA now.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] switcheroo@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago

There needs to be recalls on elected officials who drastically change their views like this fuckup.

He basically turned into a Con and still got to remain in his position!

[-] 7101334@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

"Rotating villain strategy" would like a word with you

[-] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

I knew that he was a piece of shit from the start, because of his stance on fracking and Israel.

It's what happens when neither the press nor the party actually vet candidates. Instead they ignore any compromising history and then collaborate with them to sell the public a new image.

He has always been a lazy contrarian. His dad basically paid for his first public office as mayor where he did nothing for the town but raise cost of living by marketing the town as a vacation spot for tourist. During this tenure he also held one of his constituents at going point for the crime of being a poc and jogging near his home.

As Lt governor he was out of office 115 days out of the year and only had 4-5 hour days the time he chose to show up. He was also largely absent from presiding over the state Senate....which he was legally required to do.

Anyone who's ever worked with him has gone on the record about how he doesn't want to do anything unless he gets to do it his way, even if his way is the worst way possible. He's just a spoiled nepo baby pretending to be blue collar. His dad is literally a CEO and owner of a huge insurance company, is a large conservative donor, and bankrolled his sons life well into his 40s.

[-] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 1 week ago

Trump and Epstein raped those kids

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CoolSouthpaw@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago

What a fucking piece of shit.

[-] chilicheeselies@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

Its just too fishy that there is always, conveniently, a singlr dem vote in the senate to support right wing bullshit.

[-] 7101334@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

That's called rotating villain strategy.

[-] qarbone@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

I don't think all Democrats are working directly with MAGA. But I'd believe it if these Republicans hiding in the Democrat party meet together to find the absolute minimum number that would need to support MAGA bills to get them to pass. They probably cycle who betrays US citizens so they can deny claims they only ever vote MAGA.

[-] ReptilianCleric@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

This kind of maneuvering is exactly what the elected officials spend all their time doing, and no they don't spend any time actually writing laws. Laws are written by corporations and sold to the politicians who are just playing a dumb fucking popularity game.

[-] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The war powers resolution failed 49 to 50 as the Pennsylvanian was the only Democrat to vote with Republicans who control the Senate. Three Republicans — U.S. Sens. Rand Paul, of Kentucky; Susan Collins, of Maine; and Lisa Murkowski, of Alaska — voted with Democrats.

Saying that Fetterman's vote was deciding is silly, when it was a 49 to 50 vote - every vote was deciding.

And the Republican dissenter votes are purely performative. They pull this shit all the time, with the same persons. Who would never vote against their party, if the vote could truly fail. Especially Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski do this all the time. Hence the people here blaming the Democrats for being captured are sheep being tricked by the Republican performance.

[-] hperrin@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 week ago

Literally the opposite of what he was elected to do. Such a shame. He’s a piece of shit, and I hope the worst for him.

[-] LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

I voted for him and I've never felt so betrayed by a politician I was actually kinda cool with being in a position of power.

[-] ferrule@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 week ago

After his flip to the dark side post election, I honestly don't know why there aren't a lot more people cosplaying as Republicans. That side is so easily duped that anyone who comes out faking hate for moinorities, or claiming the government is a swamp you could easily win and then just flip afterwards.

[-] nickiwest@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

I do have a friend who ran for county judge as a Democrat and was defeated. Four years later, she ran as a Republican and won. Her politics are the same as ever, but that (R) on the ticket makes the locals fill in her bubble every time she's up for reelection.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 week ago

Bet he fucked kids

[-] plz1@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago

So if he had another stroke, would he go further right-wing, or would it reverse the process?

[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 5 points 1 week ago

Hoping for locked in syndrome, until whoever still gives a shit about him gets sick of wiping his ass for him and pulls the plug.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

Can we start calling him Fecalman? Cause he's like a walking piece of shit yeah?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago

Yet another unfortunate Fetterman L

[-] TheTimeKnife@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

I cannot wait to be rid of this dishonest jackass. Dude was always blood thirsty and corrupt but masqueraded as a progressive and now the brain damage has him dancing for republican bribes. I really hope voters hold him responsible for this betrayal. They didnt hold him responsible for his abuses of power in the past, but I think the tide may have turned for him. Too bad these Senate terms are so long.

[-] TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com 9 points 1 week ago

please tell me he's getting primaried?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

I wish there was a way to get them out of office. Too bad the US system doesn’t have a vote of no confidence.

I guess the only way is to sue him for misrepresentation since he changed parties after being voted by the Democrats.

[-] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Fetterman is a piece of shit, but ANY single vote would have been the deciding vote. I don't care for headlines that try to pin the blame / credit for this kind of thing on a single person

[-] blady_blah@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

I'm betting he was the ONLY democrat. Yep. ONLY democrat. That's why this is significant.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Like Fetterman, his stroke didn't do its job well enough.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 May 2026
452 points (100.0% liked)

politics

29873 readers
2584 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS